5 reasons why Microsoft buying Skype makes sense

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

About this blog

Coretech

Jack's Blog

News and comment on what's happening in the technology industry, and the direction it's heading.

Microsoft's $8.5 billion purchase of Skype has prompted a lot of confused speculation, but Microsoft clearly spelled out its reasons, and the things it didn't say are pretty obvious. If it still doesn't make sense to you, here are five reasons why it should.

1. Microsoft can make money from Skype, which it has dismally failed to do from most of its online ventures. Yes, Skype has also been losing money, but in 2010, it had an EBITDA of $264 million on revenues of $860 million. Remove the debt and the new Skype division should soon be contributing $1 billion to Microsoft's revenues and more than $300 million in profits. It also has a lot of potential for growth. (EBITDA is earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization.)

2. Skype can enhance other Microsoft products, and in the press conference call Microsoft chief executive Steve Ballmer said: "We’re committed to optimizing Skype for the TV with Xbox and Kinect for the Windows Phone and the Windows PC." He also said: "we want to extend the reach of Skype by connecting Skype users with users of our Outlook products, our Lync, Enterprise, Unified Communications product, Xbox Live, and other opportunities like Messenger and Hotmail".

3. Skype will extend Microsoft's reach across other platforms and devices, including TV sets (it's already on 50 million of those) in ways that Microsoft Messenger and Lync cannot. Ballmer said: "First, and I've got to underscore this, we're committed to the Skype user base." Since Skype will be a separate division reporting directly to Ballmer, other Microsoft divisions will find it hard to bury it or neglect the non-Windows versions. And if it's run as a standalone business, Microsoft should still be able to sell it, at a reduced price, if things don't work out.

4. Skype works for both businesses and home users. Microsoft didn't need Skype's technology because it already has successful audio and video chat systems in Messenger and Lync. However, Messenger is mainly popular with home users while Lync is only used in businesses. As Ballmer pointed out, Skype can be an option on both its existing systems and it bridges the gap between the two. In fact, Skype was going to bridge this gap anyway, but not to Microsoft's advantage….

5. Skype will help Microsoft's relationships with important partners. For example, Nokia likes Skype, and Skype for Symbian is already available for at least two dozen Nokia handsets. Skype for Windows Phone will enable Nokia owners to connect. Most if not all PC manufacturers like Skype, and could like the idea of shipping it as standard. Facebook might well like Skype, and if it happens, integrating Skype into Facebook would be a huge win for Microsoft.

Yes, but what about the price?

It does look as though Microsoft is paying over the odds for Skype, but the money really isn't significant as long as the purchase makes strategic sense (which it does), and as long as Microsoft doesn't screw it up (which it might).

Skype is based in Luxembourg, so Microsoft is able to buy it with overseas cash. If it had repatriated the money, it might have paid $1.5 billion in taxes. It may still be paying $2 billion too much ($7 billion instead of $5 billion) but that includes a premium for the unsolicited takeover, and possible competition from Google and Facebook, who were rumoured to be interested.

Microsoft could certainly have bought Skype for less in 2009, when the global economy was in a bad way, prices were depressed, and Skype was owned by a company who'd finally figured out that its strategy was wrong (eBay buyers and sellers generally don't want to talk to one another). However, it's still not a bad price compared with the $6 billion Microsoft paid for aQuantive or the ludicrous $44.6 billion it bid for Yahoo, or the $13.5 billion that Symantec paid for Veritas. It's not in the silly league from the last bubble, where Yahoo paid $3.6 billion for GeoCities and $5.7 billion for Broadcast.com.

Either way, it doesn't matter. Microsoft has about $50 billion in the bank and has already given more than twice that amount back to its shareholders. This includes a windfall gift to shareholders of $32 billion in a single pay-out. If it hadn't bought Skype, the money would either have sat in a foreign bank account doing not very much or been used to buy Microsoft shares, and neither of those would have been of any real benefit to the business. Skype just might be.

Talkback

@Jack,

$8 billion for a company that's making only $264 per year, before tax?

You say that "Microsoft can money from Skype" without saying how. The main reason that people use Skype is because it's free. If MS starts trying to charge for Skype to Skype calls people will leave in droves. There are alternatives out there.

I think your last paragraph gets nearer the mark. Microsoft bought Skype because it could. It's Ballmer showing that he can still spend big and make a splash, whether it makes any sense or not. It's the last twitching of a dying dinosaur and it's not pretty. He'll be gone by the end of the year.

My name is Ballmer, King of Kings
Look on my works, ye mighty, and despair!

BrownieBoy 13 May, 2011 23:46
Reply

@Jack
first of all they made $264Million pure profit out of $860Million annual revenue.
and what are you, six years old that you think MS needs to charge for SKYPE to make money out of it?
there are over 405Million people using SKYPE world wide and every social network and business want to be connected or seen by that many people so why do they need to charge to make money out of eveyone want a piece of?
grow up and don't post nonsense.
i suppose you don't think facebook make money either with over 500Million users.
can you imagine if you had a billboard that 400Million could see?
waw.you must have PHD in business.

Kaveh Rahimian via Facebook 15 May, 2011 02:04
Reply

sorry my post was a reply to BrownieBoy's comment.

Kaveh Rahimian via Facebook 15 May, 2011 02:24
Reply

@Kaveh,

Charmed, I'm sure.

Your maths is somewhat more impressive than your punctuation. Even so, here's a calculation for *you*: at "$264Million pure profit of $860 annual revenue" it will take Microsoft 32 years to get back its $8.5 billion.

And yes, I think a "six years old" person could work that one out too.

BrownieBoy 15 May, 2011 23:00
Reply

Yes - Microsoft with good and synergistic integration of Skype, could potentially enhance revenue and profitability.

But given Microsoft history the chances are dim. I would bet Microsoft gains nothing from Skype in bottom line or synergy.

Any takers?

minhazl 16 May, 2011 12:29
Reply

@minhazl
> But given Microsoft history the chances are dim.

Why do you say that? Obviously Microsoft messed up with Danger, but keeping Skype as a separate division run by its current management should avoid that problem.

@Kaveh Rahimian via Facebook

I just skip over Brownie Boy's comments. Works for me....

Jack Schofield 16 May, 2011 12:42
Reply

@Jack,

There's a bit more to it than Danger, Jack. How about $6 billion for aQuantive?

Actually, Business Insider had a nice summary of Microsoft's acquisitions, and what happend to them, at:

http://www.businessinsider.com/microsofts-15-biggest-acquisitions-and-what-happened-to-them-2011-3?op=1#ixzz1LyNOSqAa

Although there's some successes there - $20-40 million for Bungie was a steal - the flops are definitely in the majority.

BrownieBoy 17 May, 2011 05:33
Reply

Microsoft would want to dive into Internet Telephony. The "shortest cut" to do that is to bye Skype rather than going to obtain License.
That nice move....

Engr. Uche 31 May, 2011 20:43
Reply

This post has been removed by a moderator.

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

apexwm

NanWag : A Windows Server 2008 is being used because the environment that the Macs are in is a heavy Windows environment. I am proposing that...

26 minutes ago by apexwm on Windows Server 2008 drops the ball for Mac compatibility
BellamysIT

Really good article. You bring to light a few really good things. However, isn't it true that over 70% of fortune 500 companies use sharepoint?...

28 minutes ago by BellamysIT on Designing a SharePoint farm: Tiers before bedtime
annonymous2

If Piratebay is a crime then so is borrowing a dvd you purchased to a family member or a friend. Why should we not be aloud to share. Most of the...

2 hours ago by annonymous2 on UK ISPs ordered to block Pirate Bay website
NanWag

File Services For Macintosh was causing Excel to prompt for Overwriting changes or Save Another Copy because it was changing the timestamp on the...

3 hours ago by NanWag on Windows Server 2008 drops the ball for Mac compatibility
Regis Machado

creative cloud $48/month in the USA, £48/month in the UK ($79). good for the competitors

5 hours ago by Regis Machado via Facebook on Adobe move promotes piracy
Tom Espiner

Hello KosGirl, Good question. I've asked Belfius for a response. The latest post I can find on Pastebin about it is here:...

5 hours ago by Tom Espiner on Hackers hold bank to ransom over stolen data
KosGirl

Have there been any further updates to this story? I can't find any information on whether the hackers released the data or not.

6 hours ago by KosGirl on Hackers hold bank to ransom over stolen data
SandJ

I have done 7 speed tests this morning on different speed test tools. They tell me my download speed is: 12.3, 12.3, 12.3, 11.1, 12.7, 12.7, 11.7...

7 hours ago by SandJ on Watchdog: TalkTalk's broadband speed test misled users
Jack Schofield

@Mary Microsoft could always send Mozilla a spec sheet and oblige them to meet the same standards as IE. Then Mozilla can spend millions of...

10 hours ago by Jack Schofield on Windows RT browsers and the point of Windows RT
goth1csnake3

Not before time, that people making films,dvd's get whats coming to them. Well done, Virgin Media.

12 hours ago by goth1csnake3 on Virgin Media: Spotify deal will bring down piracy
Simon Bisson and Mary Branscombe

Apex - the question then is what about letting the user choose to have a tablet where they don't have to have that responsibility? why can't the...

22 hours ago by Simon Bisson and Mary Branscombe on Windows RT browsers and the point of Windows RT
Simon Bisson and Mary Branscombe

Moley, Apex, thanks; I think there's an interesting other dimension of choice - the choice to have a platform that is 'locked down' in the sense...

22 hours ago by Simon Bisson and Mary Branscombe on Mozilla accuses Microsoft of shutting Firefox out of WOA
Yellowcave

Not surprised. I once used the methods to let my firewall just notify me of breaches. Not one single logged event was genuine. Once, we all...

1 day ago by Yellowcave on Mobile porn filters catch innocent content, says report
duplex

live realy sucks in facebook becuase people hack your profile

1 day ago by duplex on Irish watchdog: Facebook privacy still falls short
Ed Macnair

If only it was that simple. When you start accessing Cloud applications you are stuck with the security model the vendor provides...........unless...

1 day ago by Ed Macnair via Facebook on IT security? You're doing it wrong!
Phil at Cloud4

Another good updaet, I have enjoyed going on the journey reading this series on SharePoint 2010 and have learned alot. Great writing.

1 day ago by Phil at Cloud4 on Designing a SharePoint farm: Tiers before bedtime
muteen

roumers of an ipad Mini, isnt that just an iTouch!?

1 day ago by muteen on Apple rebrands iPad 4G as 'Wi-Fi + Cellular' for UK
apexwm

Thanks for this article and bringing this issue to light. Unfortunately this type of activity is common not only with Adobe, but many other...

1 day ago by apexwm on Adobe move promotes piracy
Andy Bolstridge

there's a very thin line between tax avoidance and tax efficiency - earning £850 a month and claiming dividends to bring my income up to normal...

1 day ago by Andy Bolstridge via Facebook on The Idle Self-employed
Andy Bolstridge

I see that they are happy to announce these numbers.. but no-one will take any notice until they start announcing sales numbers too.

1 day ago by Andy Bolstridge via Facebook on Microsoft's score card for Smoked by Windows Phone

Community highlights

BarryGill

Darth Vader brought his own device...

Blog Post A few weeks ago I wrote a blog piece called "Bring Your Own Delusion (BYOD)"....

16 May, 2012 by BarryGill
Jack Schofield

Mobile phone sales dip while smartphones boom

Blog Post Worldwide sales of mobile phones to end users fell by 2 percent to 419.1...

16 May, 2012 by Jack Schofield
First Take

HTC One V

Blog Post HTC's One range of handsets comprises three models. There's the flagship HTC...

16 May, 2012 by First Take
Simon Bisson and Mary Branscombe

Contribute, contract; endorse? Technology reputations

Blog Post Technology companies need to be careful about who and what they're seen to...

16 May, 2012 by Simon Bisson and Mary Branscombe