
It doesn't take much looking at that image, or browsing of their web site, before you realize that Jolicloud is a derivative of the Ubuntu Netbook Remix. That has good and bad aspects - good, because you could hardly choose a better, and more stable, base to build on; bad, because it has all of the hardware restrictions and requirements inherent in UNR, particularly for advanced graphic (3D/GL) support, which means that it works quite well on Intel Atom-based netbooks with Intel 945/950 chipsets, but for most AMD/ATI/nVidia-based netbooks you have to be willing and able to download and install proprietary graphic drivers to make it usable, and for VIA-based netbooks you're basically out of luck. That may sound a bit restrictive, but the fact is that the vast majority of netbooks on the market today are Atom-based (ASUS, Acer, HP, Lenova, and so on), so it's going to be just fine in most cases.
Furthermore, the current Jolicloud pre-Beta distribution is based on a pre-Karmic version of Ubuntu Netbook Remix. Look at the screen shot again, and compare it to the Karmic UNR screens in my previous blog post about netbook Linux, and you can see the difference. There is some discussion in the Jolicloud blog about a new UI coming soon, but it isn't clear whether they will be moving to a Karmic UNR base, or they are making their own desktop - I suspect the latter, but I have seen very little concrete information so far.
There are two approaches to downloading and installing Jolicloud. The one which they seem to prefer is "Jolicloud Express", which installs into a running Windows system - I assume it uses wubi, but my objective is to get rid of Windows, not work within it, so I didn't pursue this at all. Of course, their objective is to get it onto as many netbooks as possible, with as little pain as possible, so this approach is probably a good idea for them. The other way to get Jolicloud is to download an ISO image, use it to create a bootable CD, USB or Flash drive, and either run that as a Live image, or install it from there. There are utility programs in the Jolicloud download area to accomplish this on Windows, MacOS or Linux. Hmm. So I guess that means there are actually three ways to get Jolicloud running on your netbook, two of which don't require any permanent changes or reconfiguration:
- Install the "Express" version, which will leave you running Jolicloud under Windows. Fast, painless, reasonably easy to undo (just go to Windows Add/Remove Programs).
- Download the ISO file and bootable media creator utility, make a bootable CD/USB/Flash copy, and simply run from that. Not quite as fast or painless to set up as the Express version, but it makes absolutely no changes to your hard drive or Windows installation. If you decide you don't like it, there is nothing to do but stop booting from the Live media; if you decide you do like it and want to keep it, it is a simple task to install it either in place of Windows, or to let the installer repartition your hard drive and install it into its own partition without disturbing Windows.
- Download the ISO, create bootable media from it, and install it right away, without bothering to continue running from the Live media. This is what I did, and the entire process took less than an hour.
Once you have a bootable "Live" copy of Jolicloud, installation is exactly the same as for UNR. It took about 10 minutes to install on my ASUS N10J alongside of Windows Vista and the variety of other Linux distributions I have on there already. Once the installation is finished, reboot and you will get the initial screen shown above. While that is a pretty ordinary looking UNR desktop, I think the new and redesigned icons at the top right of the screen probably give a good idea of where Jolicloud is going, and what the new UI might look like. The following screen shot shows the "Preferences" section of the desktop, with a lot more redesigned icons.

Once you get Jolicloud installed and connected to the Internet, you are encouraged to connect to the Jolicloud server and create an accout for yourself (and your netbook, actually). In some ways, Jolicloud reminds me of Moblin, it is very web-centric. For example, it offers to pick up your own profile information from one of various online services, as well as picking up friends and contacts there. It was at this point that I noticed that the Jolicloud distribution actually does not include a number of packages that are in the UNR distribution, such as OpenOffice.org. The idea is that once you get the base distribution installed, you can go to their online package management system, and easily choose and install whatever other packages you need.

This shot shows the "App Directory", which has available packages and applications grouped by the usual types (Office, Development, Games, etc), as well as "All" and "Favorites" (shown here). It also shows the "Dashboard", which is where you find the Update options for the system and any additional apps you have installed, and "Settings", where you can check and update your profile information.
As I said, it looks to me like Jolicloud has in many ways the kind of "Social" orientation that Moblin has (see Facebook, Twitter etc. in the Apps shot above), but in my opinion they are doing a much better job of integrating it with Linux, keeping the whole thing much more familiar and accessible to experienced Linux users. Even more importantly, they have avoided the juvenile graphics that Moblin is riddled with, and they have actually produced an original and appealing interface. Their blog pomises that the "new UI" will be significantly better than this pre-Beta version, and if that is true it should be magnificent.
Keep that last bit in mind, though, when you consider whether you want to try Jolicloud right now. First, it is openly proclaimed as a "pre-Beta" development version, and second they have clearly stated that a major update is in the works. If you are brave enough to go ahead and try it anyway, I think you might be pleased and impressed with it.
jw 5/1/2010










Talkback
Good report - written like a professional!
I don't have a netbook but have fiddled with a couple of my customers' ones. One guy with an Asus eee removed the original O/S and installed UNR. He then went on to install Ubuntu 9.10 as he didn't like the interface in UNR. I must say I agreed with him.
Is this because I'm used to the Ubuntu desktop, or are Netbook re-mixes cluttered?
The UNR type desktop does grow on you over time, and it's helped by having an autumnal type wallpaper installed as this shows through and 'softens' the desktop. Of course, you can just change to the Gnome desktop if you wish, with a slight improvement in start up and shut down times.
In passing I prefer the Jaunty desktop to the Karmic desktop as the icons are too large in Karmic and have (ugly) Vista style highlights when selected.
@Pop - I also find the UNR desktop "cluttered", albeit 9.10/Karmic somewhat less than previous versions. I don't think it would be correct or fair to extend this judgment to all netbook re-mixes, but it is certainly true that many, perhaps most, current re-mixes are derived from UNR, and as a result suffer from the same clutter. One counter-example would be the prototype KDE Netbook desktop, I find it less cluttered than UNR, but rather clunky to work with right now - I hope the clunkiness goes away as development continues. But I also have to say that the users whom I have set up with UNR have all been happy with it, and I put a lot of stock in Moley's opinion, so maybe it's just us, or maybe we just haven't given it enough of a chance.
@Moley - Interesting observation regarding the icons in Karmic, I had not used it long enough to really pay attention and notice that. Now that I have gone back and looked more carefully, I agree with you. In any case, I find the icons in UNR in general to be over-complicated, and the fact that the "animation" associated with them require accelerated graphic support to work properly to be extremely irritating. We're talking about netbook here, for heaven's sake, which are supposed to be simple, low-speed, low-power devices, and the decision to take advantage of the fact that the Intel graphic drivers for Atom-based systems have accelerated graphics to be a bad one. But that's just my opinion...
Thanks to both for reading and commenting.
jw