17 Sep 2004 15:56
One of the most debilitating IT headaches strikes when confidential data leaks out of the company's network and trickles into the hands of malicious users. No matter how robust your technology is, or how intuitive your detection systems are, restricted data somehow manages to seep through the least guarded nooks and crannies of the enterprise.
Our experts said that the usual and most overlooked sources of data leakage are slapdash database privileges, plain ol' email, and slipshod security policies. Here are some recommended strategies and brand-name solutions.
Stop 'broad-brush' database privileges
According to Chris Johnson, senior manager of product management at BMC Software, misuse by "authorised but unethical" employees can lead to data leakage in the database environment.
Johnson provided three scenarios and recommendations for keeping data protected:
Johnson added that identity and access management products such as BMC's CONTROL-SA make it much easier to administer and manage user access across the enterprise. BMC's Database Security Management by IPLocks helps companies keep complete records of who has what privileges and who has changed or queried what data. "[They're] great if you ever need to investigate the cause of a data theft or data integrity problem. And if you let people know this control is in place, it will discourage misbehaviour," Johnson said.
Stop mass-mailing your confidential info
"The number-one channel for both malicious and inadvertent leaks of valuable, confidential information is plain old email," said Gary Steele, CEO of Proofpoint, Inc.
A recent survey that Proofpoint conducted with Forrester Consulting found that IT directors and managers are most concerned about outbound email threats, especially leakage of confidential memos, valuable intellectual property, and trade secrets.
Steele said that leaks are not always malicious. "Recently, in California, employees of Contra Costa County were inadvertently sending all sorts of confidential information to an email address in Sweden," he said. "Similarly, a court reporter transcribing hearings in the Kobe Bryant rape case accidentally leaked confidential court transcripts when they were emailed to the wrong distribution list."
Steele added that certainly there are also malicious leaks. "A quick scan of sites such as internalmemos.com will show dozens of sensitive internal memos from Fortune 500 companies -- typically sent by insiders to the site's publisher. There are also cases such as the recent AOL insider theft of screen names / email addresses."
For companies looking for technology solutions to this problem, Steele recommended the Proofpoint Protection Server software and Proofpoint P-Series Appliance, which provide a complete message-protection platform that guards against inbound email threats (such as spam and viruses) and helps ensure that outbound messages comply with company policies and external regulations.
Stop careless security practices
Jeff Bowling, founder and CEO of TELXAR, stressed that the best way to plug data leakage is to implement a good security plan, which should not only include the dos and don'ts for the internal network, but also serve as a guidebook for the network administrators. The plan should include the following basic, often overlooked, policies:
Consider a nontechnical approach
Johnson proposed another tactic. "I'm surprised more companies don't use nontechnical approaches to security." He said that it's possible to perform real background investigations on employees in sensitive positions to see if they have any red flags indicating poor trustworthiness. "I used to work in the defence industry, and this was an absolute rule," he said.
"We also had a rule that secure systems could never be used by a single person in isolation -- there were machine rooms where you had to go in with a 'buddy', sign in and sign out, and keep an eye on each other."
Johnson added that there is probably a business opportunity for someone to apply the defence-type approach to the commercial environment. "Imagine if a specific outsource provider ran civilian systems with the same security standards used by defence. Expensive, and not desirable for every system, but could be very attractive for the most important / regulated data."
Story URL: http://news.zdnet.co.uk/security/0,1000000189,39165716,00.htmCopyright © 1995-2009 CBS Interactive Limited. All rights reserved
ZDNET is a registered service mark of CBS Interactive Limited. ZDNET Logo is a service mark of CBS Interactive Limited.