The company has launched in the US a beta test of its Google Health service for archiving medical records and finding medical services

Google on Monday launched a beta test of its Google Health service for archiving medical records and finding medical services.

The site, which is currently available for healthcare purposes in the US only, is a personal portal that can be used to upload, store and view personal information; retrieve records from partners; investigate health matters; set alerts such as a reminder to take medication; and run applications that can, for example, keep track of how many miles a person has walked.

In some areas, Google's expansion beyond search takes on incumbent powers; Google Docs, for example, competes with Microsoft Office. But Google Health competes more with a tangled mess of regulatory and privacy complexity.

"Personal health records is an area that's just beginning," said Roni Zeiger, Google Health product manager. "The fact that only few people are using those tools means we [the computing and healthcare industries] haven't got it right yet."

Google has been talking about the health initiative for a year. "We [now] actually have the product," said Marissa Mayer, vice president of search products and user experience. "You can sign up today. It is open to the public."

The service will never sell a patient's information and will only share it with the patient's permission, Zeiger said. A user can revoke rights to share at any time.

"No Google Health user will ever find their Google Health information as search results anywhere on Google. That information is yours," Zeiger said.

To join, users must agree to various terms of use, including: "When you provide your information through Google Health, you give Google a licence to use and distribute it in connection with Google Health and other Google services."

Growing beyond Google's control?
Google has done well with privacy for Google Health but there are larger issues that pose problems, said Leslie Harris, chief executive of the Center for Democracy and Technology.

"I think Google's privacy policies are good and the fact that they are going to vet applications and services is also good," Harris said. However, he added that there is the potential for problems to arise if Google Health grows beyond Google's grasp.

"I think the biggest concern is about the applications and services that will ride on top of the service that Google will have only limited control over," Harris said. "The company has appropriately developed a set of rules for those providers and will screen them before they are allowed to offer services. Those rules require express user consent for any use or sharing. But it will be impossible for Google to monitor all the vendors closely over time."

Harris added: "Consumers are going to need to have a legal remedy for misuse of their personal health information." The US Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act does not govern much of what Google itself does and, after that, the only recourse is trying to get the Federal Trade Commission to enforce companies' privacy policies.

Central copy of medical data
Google essentially creates a master record of an individual's health information by importing data from health-related institutions or by letting individuals add it themselves.

"Google on your behalf is storing a copy of your records," Zeiger said. Connections with medical organisations can be set to update regularly to keep records up-to-date.

The service integrates with medical records already stored electronically at pharmacies, including Walgreens, Medco, RxAmerica, and Longs Drug Stores; medical facilities such as Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and the Cleveland Clinic; Quest Diagnostics, which stores medical-test results; and Allscripts, which stores medical records for more than 40,000 doctors. For importing doctor records from Allscripts, the doctor must approve the connection to Google Health, said Allscripts spokesman Todd Stein, but the company's software is enabled to make the link.

If a patient permits sharing, it is currently an all-or-nothing affair, Zeiger said. As a result, patients cannot choose to keep embarrassing ailments secret. Google is working on making a finer-grained permission system, Zeiger said.

Making money
Google was silent on how it hopes to make money from Google Health besides driving more traffic to its search engine, which shows ads alongside search results, and exploiting the offering to keep users coming back for more.

A longer-term possibility may be that Google Health could be free for ordinary patients, but doctors, hospitals or others that need to archive this sort of data could be charged a managed-storage subscription fee.

APIs published
Google wants more elaborate software to run in conjunction with Google Health, and accordingly has published an application programming interface (API) so people can, for example, integrate website widgets.

"Today we're publishing our APIs — our instructions for how programmers connect," Zeiger said.

The service is currently only available in the US, but Google will expand it, Zeiger added. To do so, Google Health must navigate choppy waters.

"Healthcare is more complex than other products Google launches. Even at the level of privacy and regulation, we have a lot of homework to do and a lot of learning," Zeiger said.

Copyright © 1995-2009 CNET Networks, Inc. All rights reserved
ZDNET is a registered service mark of CNET Networks, Inc. ZDNET Logo is a service mark of CNET Networks, Inc.