Microsoft's subscription-like charges cost more

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

NEWS
A controversial licensing programme from Microsoft has added up to higher costs for a number of the software maker's corporate customers. Sixty percent of businesses that signed up for the Licensing 6 programme have seen increases in the fees they pay Microsoft for its software, according to a recent survey. Yankee Group and Sunbelt Software conducted the survey among 1,000 technology managers worldwide. The survey results are the latest pothole on the long road that Microsoft has taken toward the licensing system. The company has been catching flak for the plan for nearly two years. Microsoft announced Licensing 6 in May 2001, but stretched out the full implementation of the plan some 14 months in response to stiff customer resistance. Microsoft fully enacted Licensing 6 on 1 August, 2002. Under two-year or three-year "Software Assurance" contracts, companies pay for discounted upgrades in advance of receiving the software. The new programme also eliminated off-the-shelf upgrades that allowed businesses to purchase the software when they wanted. But there is a bright spot in the latest findings. A similar survey conducted in October 2001 showed that 80 percent of technology managers expected an increase in their Microsoft software costs. While the new programme certainly hit many businesses hard, Yankee Group analyst Laura DiDio said that she was "encouraged" that only 60 percent of Licensing 6 adopters saw price increases. DiDio attributed the lower percentage to two factors: many larger businesses that upgrade every two to three years already "were in line for more favourable deals from Microsoft. Also, contrary to popular opinion, Microsoft did work closely with many customers and offer them additional incentives." Just under a third of those signing up for the plan saw their Microsoft licensing fees remain the same, according to the study. Twenty-two percent of Licensing 6 adopters saw their costs increase 5 to 20 percent, while 16.8 percent saw a 20 percent to 30 percent increase. Almost 8 percent reported a 30 percent to 50 percent rise, and another 7.4 percent reported cost increases of more than 50 percent. Costs doubled for 6.3 percent of respondents. None reported costs tripling. Analyst firm Gartner early on had estimated that the plan would raise licensing fees 33 percent to 107 percent. Not all Licensing 6 adopters reported price hikes. The Yankee/Sunbelt study revealed that for 10.5 percent of participants, licensing costs decreased 5 percent to 20 percent. Only 1 percent of survey respondents reported savings of more than 20 percent. As expected, a great many Microsoft customers simply skipped Licensing 6 altogether, the survey revealed. Nearly three-quarters of businesses -- 72 percent -- refused to sign up for the programme. But that figure is somewhat deceptive. About 42 percent of businesses signed up under the older and cheaper Licensing 5 plan, before Microsoft closed the door on the programme at the end of July. The number also fails to take into account the number of larger businesses that switched to a plan largely unaffected by the Licensing 6 changes. Microsoft offers three licensing plans: Open, Select and Enterprise Agreements. The first two are the ones affected by the Licensing 6 changes and by the introduction of the subscription-like Software Assurance programme. An Enterprise Agreement is already an annuity programme, and one that has grown in popularity in part because of the higher cost of Software Assurance under Open and Select licensing plans. Gartner analyst Alvin Park estimated that a full one-third of companies refused to sign new Open or Select agreements under Licensing 6. About another third renewed under Licensing 5, with the rest signing up for an Enterprise agreement. Based on analyst estimates, the percentage of businesses signing up for Enterprise agreements jumped to more than 30 percent, from less than 15 percent, of Microsoft licensing customers. During Microsoft's analyst conference earlier this month, chief executive Steve Ballmer revealed that 2,500 to 3,000 of the company's 4,000 largest customers had signed up for an Enterprise agreement, Park said. "That's much higher than I would have expected," he added. The bigger the company, the better the deal
That larger companies were switching to Enterprise agreements or getting better Licensing 6 deals in general didn't surprise IDC analyst Al Gillen. "What you didn't get from the bad press is a sense is who was complaining," he explained. "Very often it was the smaller organisations that were bent out of shape about licensing. That's because the larger organisations got a better deal." Businesses skipping Licensing 6 cited many reasons, according to Yankee Group and Sunbelt Software. Twenty-five percent of technology managers said their businesses simply couldn't afford the new programme. Another 28 percent said the Licensing 6 terms confused them, so they decided to pass on the plan. About 6 percent said they had significant problems with "non-complying software" -- either packages the companies had paid for, but could not offer proof of having purchased, or packages for which there had been out-and-out piracy. Microsoft would not disclose its licensing renewal information, which, as it uses actual sales data, conceivably would be more accurate than analysts' estimates. Because Microsoft doesn't publicly disclose those numbers to Wall Street, the information cannot be revealed elsewhere, said Harley Sitner, a Microsoft senior product manager. "That's a business decision we made, and once we made that decision we have to stay on that track," he explained. Assessing the ultimate fallout of Licensing 6 could take years, say analysts. One reason: The first wave of Licensing 6 customers won't need to renew until the end of October. "It's virtually impossible for a customer to calculate, when he pays his money in advance, what he's going to get in advance," said Paul DeGroot, an analyst with market researcher Directions on Microsoft. "He does not know when the product is going to be released, what he's going to get when it's released, and if it has anything he would like." In two or three years, Microsoft will get the answer to that question, when customers decide to sign up for more Software Assurance or pass on renewing their contracts, DeGroot said. In the short term, Microsoft reaped huge windfalls. Unearned revenue, mostly from licensing, accounted for 22 percent of overall revenue in Microsoft's second fiscal quarter, ended 31 December. Microsoft ended its second quarter with $8.83bn (£5.65bn) in unearned revenue. During its first quarter, unearned revenue swelled to $9.13bn, up from $5.85bn a year earlier. Still, Microsoft also recognises Licensing 6 hurt customer relationships and is hoping to repair them. "A lot of customers are dissatisfied," conceded Rebecca LaBrunerie, Microsoft's product manager for worldwide licensing and pricing. "We did make some mistakes," she said. "We didn't roll out (Licensing 6) properly and we didn't make the announcement and timing carefully, which is why we extended (the deadline) a few times, giving 14 months overall." Gartner's Park said the damage has been significant. "Microsoft hurt the trust many customers placed in it, and that is going to take some time to fix," he explained. Microsoft extends an olive branch
Damage repair in part explains a number of conciliatory changes Microsoft has made to its licensing changes over the last six months. For example, Microsoft last week changed the licensing for eight server software products. Starting 1 April, customers will buy licences for just the number of processors the software uses, rather than for every processor on a server. In December, Microsoft changed client-access licences (CALs) for accessing Windows Server 2003. Under the revision, companies could buy CALs for users as well as for computers accessing the server. "When I look at Windows Server 2003 CALs, I just don't see any downside for customers," Park said. In fact, Microsoft may have learned from its mistakes, he concluded. The company could have eliminated per-seat, or per-machine CALs, in the process. "There are lots of companies that have more users than they have computers," Park said. "Eliminating the older CALs would have made them mad at Microsoft." In November, Microsoft launched a new licensing programme aimed at bringing some benefits of Enterprise Agreements to smaller businesses -- the group of customers most discontented with Licensing 6. Microsoft's Sitner described these and other changes, such as the establishment of a customer licensing board, as a way of "recognising the mistakes that we made" and a sign the company is "listening to our customers and making changes in response to that." "Microsoft is clearly trying to offer olive branches," DiDio said. "Could more be done? Yes. I'm sure customers would like the status quo back. I'd like to pay 1965 prices for gas, too. But that's not going to happen." Businesses will have to live with the peace offerings and be satisfied, she said. "Things aren't going back to what they were." For now, the olive branches are having some impact. In the earlier survey of technology managers, 38 percent said they would wait on Windows XP as they explored other alternatives. But in the newer survey, 3.5 percent said they were in the process of switching to competing operating systems, such as Linux. Mark Romanowski, a senior vice president with New York-based technology services company AMC, said that his customers have started accepting Licensing 6 and warming up to softening policies on other products. "It has been relatively quiet," he said. "The major uproar that happened way back then -- that's over now. We've been taking sort of an unscientific poll every time we meet with customers about any issues with their licensing. No one seems concerned." Still, DiDio and Park both cautioned that there's more than goodwill at work on Microsoft's part. Park noted that the Open Value product greatly benefits Microsoft's push into the small business market. At the same time, changing Windows Server 2003 terms helps in a market where Microsoft faces competition from Linux and Unix. More importantly, Microsoft is responding to the continuing decline in technology spending. "They're getting the fact that the customers simply don't have the cash," DiDio said. "What good is picking the pocket if there's nothing there to pick?" Microsoft's effort to take the sting out of Licensing 6 could be critical to moving the remaining three-quarters of the installed base to the plan, DiDio emphasised. "They are facing the worst and prolonged economic downturn in recent memory. Some customers simply lack the cash."
See the Software News Section for the latest headlines on everything from peer to peer clients to Office software and beyond. Let the editors know what you think in the Mailroom.

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

Frederick Wrigley

I'be been using Mint 12 since the RC came out, and I am far more happy with the Cinnamon, the Mate, and, yes (with extensions), theGnome 3...

10 minutes ago by Frederick Wrigley via Facebook on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
bdantas

Excellent article. One small correction, though--although a fresh installation of Linux Mint 12 will, indeed, provide the user with a version of...

53 minutes ago by bdantas on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

1 hour ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

1 hour ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Moley

For Gnome 2 die-hards, it is possible to add icons to the bottom panel (or top top panel, if you prefer) which provide the exact Gnome 2...

2 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
ramwellian

Your comments would seem pretty naive and immature. Your 'solution' appears to be, "gee, let's all just give in to the hackers and give them...

2 hours ago by ramwellian on Cloud computing security: no more oxymoron?
BugStalker

"Interesting thought ... If you installed Win7 as a dual boot on a machine that previously only had Linux, and it wrecked your Linux installation,...

3 hours ago by BugStalker on Windows 7 Declares War on GRUB
whs001

This is an excellent summary of Ubuntu and Mint and the interface differences between them. Most such articles take a very partisan position for...

3 hours ago by whs001 on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Moley

@ewallace. Not so clear. Anyone can obtain the text, for example from here http://www.ustr.gov/webfm_send/2379. I support ACTA so long as it and...

3 hours ago by Moley on ACTA: Facts, misconceptions and questions
45283

I think WinRT is fantastic. I just wish it was an option for people that didn't want to go through Microsoft's App Store with its attendant...

6 hours ago by 45283 on Why Windows 8 needs architectural hygiene for WOA
Burn-IT

Nine people? £30m? Who's back pocket is that lot going in? And IF they say it is for new buildings, what about all the ones the government has...

7 hours ago by Burn-IT on Police set to launch three £30m e-crime hubs
ewallace

Just to be clear, nobody knows what is in the text of ACTA, here is a photograph of the text of ACTA http://twitpic.com/8h9iju as submitted to the...

7 hours ago by ewallace on ACTA: Facts, misconceptions and questions
fgvrg56

Unfortunately main issue is that ASUS is refusing to accept that they make some mistake on this version of asus Transformer prime. 1 - GPS sensor...

9 hours ago by fgvrg56 on Asus Eee Pad Transformer Prime Wi-Fi & GPS problems?
Ben Woods

@Marcus A fair question. Just talked with Archos which said it was working on an announcement for next week....

10 hours ago by Ben Woods on Archos confirms G9 Ice Cream Sandwich update schedule
Marcus Karlsson

Any update on this, considering the claimed "first week of February"?

11 hours ago by Marcus Karlsson via Facebook on Archos confirms G9 Ice Cream Sandwich update schedule
apexwm

Bill Goodrich : Just as al_langevin pointed out, with Windows Server 2008 there is no Services for Macintosh anymore. It's gone, not available....

19 hours ago by apexwm on Windows Server 2008 drops the ball for Mac compatibility
txtrainguy

Replying to an old topic that I'm currently facing with my CEO (who is on a Mac). Our servers are primarily Windows Servers, office is about...

1 day ago by txtrainguy on Windows Server 2008 drops the ball for Mac compatibility
k0tcs3

Sure, that makes perfect sense. Pay wrong-doers money and thank them for breaching your security and pointing out your flaws, that would surely...

1 day ago by k0tcs3 on US indicts Romanian over NASA climate change hack
Random_Error

I think he's referring specifically to Android apps, as Apple do regulate their App Store, but Google seem to let any old crap onto the Android store!

1 day ago by Random_Error on RIM: BlackBerry will keep 'garbage' apps out of store
Paul Fezziwig

Keep the crap apps out?! How will they compete with Android and Apple's claim to fame of having so many life changing apps? I wonder if the media...

1 day ago by Paul Fezziwig via Facebook on RIM: BlackBerry will keep 'garbage' apps out of store

Latest in Application Development