Microsoft's SCO licensing deal 'snubs Linux'

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

ANALYSIS
Microsoft's licensing of rights to Unix technology from the SCO Group lends heavyweight backing to SCO's intellectual-property claims and helps Microsoft combat Linux, a growing marketplace threat to its operating system, analysts said. SCO on Monday said that Microsoft has licensed from it the source code and patents associated with the Unix operating system. The licence ensures that Microsoft's software complies with SCO's intellectual-property rights and that the software giant can ensure compatibility with Unix software, according to a Microsoft representative. The deal also appears to lend credence to SCO's charges that large parts of Unix source code have been copied into Linux. Microsoft's move may have a snowball effect, causing other companies to also strike licensing pacts with SCO, industry experts said. SCO, based in Lindon, Utah, alleges that IBM inappropriately used technology from Unix in the Linux operating system and has filed a $1bn (about £640m) lawsuit against the company. IBM, which is a major backer of Linux as an open-source alternative to Microsoft's Windows, has dismissed SCO's claims and says it has a valid licence to Unix technology. Chris Sontag, the general manager of SCO's intellectual-property division, said that the Microsoft licensing agreement reflects the strength of its intellectual-property (IP) suit against IBM. Other industry experts said the Microsoft deal may be more notable for its public relations value. "The announcement really serves two purposes," RedMonk analyst Stephen O'Grady said. "First, it temporarily allows Microsoft to steal the moral higher ground from its Linux competitors; and second, it's a big fork in the eye to IBM." A Microsoft representative said that the deal was simply in response to SCO's request. "Microsoft respects legitimate licences, and Microsoft took that licence (from SCO). That's it," the representative said. But Microsoft's deal adds fuel to the fire over SCO's intellectual-property claims and helps the company financially to continue its case. Terms of the deal were not announced. SCO's stock rose nearly 38 percent, to $6.55, in trading early on Monday. Hewlett-Packard, another proponent of Linux, is unaware of any intellectual-property infringement, it said in a statement. Sun Microsystems, which has lately been promoting Linux, says it is covered by its existing Unix licensing deals. "(The licence) allows Microsoft to leverage the fear, uncertainty and doubt that is moving around Linux," said Gordon Haff, an analyst at Illuminata. "This is a defensive move on the part of Microsoft, which isn't to say that the sales and marketing people won't take advantage of it." Bruce Perens, who helped develop the Debian version of Linux and who is an unofficial spokesman for open-source programmers, said the licensing deal benefits Microsoft's anti-Linux stance and its attempt to foster fear, uncertainty and doubt -- "FUD", in computing parlance -- around Linux. The deal also confirms his suspicion, he says, that the software giant has been a force behind SCO's legal push. Microsoft has denied that charge. "This benefits Microsoft more than anything else. Microsoft does a little Unix work, but not much," Perens said. "This is more of a symbolic act intended to intimidate other companies" into complying with SCO's royalty demands, Perens said. "From my point of view, it weakens (SCO's) case, because it seems that there has been collaboration with Microsoft (over Linux intellectual-property claims) from the start." IBM on Monday said that Microsoft's licensing deal does not affect its stance. "Our position is that we are licensed, we are compliant with the licence, and we have to see how it all comes out in court," IBM spokeswoman Trink Guarino said. But analysts said that IBM and other Linux purveyors are likely to consider options other than the courts, such as cutting a deal with SCO, in order to clear up what is becoming an increasingly ugly battle. SCO last week sent letters to 1,500 corporations warning them they could be liable for using Linux. "I'm recommending that companies look to HP, IBM, SuSE, Dell and others for assistance," Forrester Research analyst Ted Schadler said. "In other words, this should not be General Motors' problem. It should be IBM's problem, just as it's always been in software (intellectual property)." Heading off trouble
Analysts said the deal is a smart legal move for Microsoft because it deflects any potential suit that SCO could make against the company on intellectual-property grounds. Microsoft developed its own version of Unix for Intel processors in the 1980s, and it still has Windows software that interoperates with Unix-based software. Microsoft and the Santa Cruz Operation, predecessor to the SCO Group, have a history of legal entanglements. In 1997, the two companies settled a dispute, brought before the European Commission in 1996, over royalties that SCO had been paying to Microsoft for technology related to Xenix, a version of Unix for personal computers developed by Microsoft in the 1980s. "Microsoft is trying to position themselves as lily-white in regards to intellectual property," Gartner analyst Tom Bittman said. "They're basically saying that they want nothing to do with this (suit)." More subtly, Microsoft's maneuver takes a dig at the open-source software business model and the companies that are backing. Microsoft general counsel and senior vice president Brad Smith said in a statement that the licence represents the company's "ongoing commitment to respecting intellectual property (IP) and the IT community's healthy exchange of IP through licensing". Microsoft has been troubled by the rise of the Linux operating system and of open-source software in general, which are maintained by independent software developers and given away at no charge. The GNU general public licence (GPL) associated with open source is anathema to Microsoft's business model, which is based on commercial software licences. Linux is now installed on roughly 27 percent of corporate servers and more than half of all Web servers, according to market researcher IDC. By licensing Unix two months after SCO sued IBM, Microsoft can also draw attention to the legal issues that the SCO suit has triggered, analysts said. Illuminating potential legal hitches associated with open-source software allows the software giant to ally itself with SCO without having to criticise the use of Linux, a tactic that has backfired for the company in the past. "Microsoft has been warning people about IP issues for a long time," Gartner analyst David Smith said. "In many ways they're looking back and able to say 'I told you so.'" News.com's Ian Fried contributed to this report.
For all your GNU/Linux and open source news, from the latest kernel releases to the newest distributions, see ZDNet UK's Linux News Section. Let the editors know what you think in the Mailroom.

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

Moley

The thing that has been puzzling me for quite a while is how Anonymous can remain anonymous whilst not only being active on the Internet but also...

13 hours ago by Moley on Anonymous activists release PCAnywhere source code
Don Dilly

If what Semantec is saying is rue, that is even worse and shows a complete disregard for thier users. If what Anonymous claims is true and the...

16 hours ago by Don Dilly via Facebook on Anonymous activists release PCAnywhere source code
MattChurchy

Didn't seem particularly biased to me either. Oh though you might have mentioned some other competitors with free search and email services...

20 hours ago by MattChurchy on Time for an evil umpire: Google, Microsoft & privacy
Simon Bisson and Mary Branscombe

James - exactly as much as anyone paid you for your comment; I don't feel that I need to say that I'm independant and unbiased, but just for you...

21 hours ago by Simon Bisson and Mary Branscombe on Time for an evil umpire: Google, Microsoft & privacy
Carl White

Once they realise symantec are willing to pay real money, they will simply keep extorting, unless of course symantec/authorities can use the...

1 day ago by Carl White via Facebook on Symantec offered hackers $50k in source code sting
Jonathan Hassell

You can find more information on BS 8878 by Jonathan Hassell its lead-author at http://www.hassellinclusion.com/bs8878/ The page includes a...

1 day ago by Jonathan Hassell on BSI publishes first British web accessibility standard
servermanagement

Thanks for this list. Now I know, what to include on my system to make it more functional.

1 day ago by servermanagement on Ten flawed products that derail productivity
1000092626

What if it's a 4 car household? The point is, more bandwidth = more things you can do simultaneously, like streaming HD video in one room of the...

1 day ago by 1000092626 on Virgin Media beats 100Mbps schedule, hikes prices
Gary Burton

No point whatsoever increasing broadband download speed. unless ever server on the net has access to massively up rated throughput. The worlds...

1 day ago by Gary Burton via Facebook on Virgin Media beats 100Mbps schedule, hikes prices
Random_Error

They're also increasing their TV package prices, whether to help fund this or not.

2 days ago by Random_Error on Virgin Media beats 100Mbps schedule, hikes prices
Techs UK

How can you set it up wrong to intermittently connect? Should I be asking for more pay? Outlook/Exchange is a breeze.

2 days ago by Techs UK on Ten flawed products that derail productivity
JamesCheese

And how much did Microsoft pay you for that article?

2 days ago by JamesCheese on Time for an evil umpire: Google, Microsoft & privacy
JamesCheese

"But how many times have you seen someone make a video call from a tablet?" I do myself a lot. "How often have you seen someone hook up a tablet...

2 days ago by JamesCheese on Apple and Amazon's tablet rivals don't get it
k0tcs3

I have to disagree with this article. Maybe there is a cultural difference between the US and UK, or maybe your network of friends is less...

2 days ago by k0tcs3 on Apple and Amazon's tablet rivals don't get it
filthylooker

My thoughts are that there's some space for change in the business world for tablets as destop replacements. I'd contend that the tablet has a...

2 days ago by filthylooker on Apple and Amazon's tablet rivals don't get it
emrahatilkan

Adobe did not dropped AIR development. It was Flex.

2 days ago by emrahatilkan on Flash 11 and AIR 3 get a release date
dd2

Company called Synergix ( www.synergix.com ) has a fix for the offline folders issue experienced by Win 7 users. And you can check out...

2 days ago by dd2 on VPNs, offline files and the simple Windows 7 fix; sometimes
Neil Lawther

I think all your above points are increasingly more invalid. The android ecosystem is open and evolving and maturing day by day. developers are...

2 days ago by Neil Lawther via Facebook on Apple and Amazon's tablet rivals don't get it
David Meyer

That really is what the European Commission is telling me. To give a precise quote: if a member state turns down the agreement, "ACTA will stay a...

2 days ago by David Meyer on ACTA's EU future in doubt after Polish pause
MyProffs Proffs

Apple devices are back online in German, take the down, no put them back...

2 days ago by MyProffs Proffs via Facebook on German iPhone, iPad sales temporarily banned

Latest in Application Development