Web standards body finalises anti-patent policy

NEWS

The Web's leading standards body on Tuesday finalised a patent policy banning the use of most royalty-bearing technology in its technical recommendations, an issue that sparked a clash between open-source advocates and software makers. The Royalty-Free Patent Policy, announced by the Patent Policy Working Group of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), has changed little from a draft released eight weeks ago. In shutting fee-bearing patents out of standards development in all but exceptional cases, it marks a compromise between open-source advocates and proprietary software companies. Patents have been a flashpoint in a battle between the open-source community and proprietary software companies. Some proprietary software makers cash in on large patent portfolios by requiring licensing fees and may be reluctant to give away the rights to intellectual property after investing time and money creating the technology. On the other hand, many in the open-source community believe patents impede the development process and can cause problems with the adoption of standards. In announcing the policy, W3C director Tim Berners-Lee hearkened back to the donation in 1993 of the founding protocols of the Web by the European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), his then-employer. "This decision on the W3C patent policy coincides almost exactly with the 10th anniversary of CERN's decision to provide unencumbered access to the basic Web protocols and software developed there," Berners-Lee wrote in the decision paper. "The decision to base the Web on royalty-free standards from the beginning has been vital to its success until now.... By adopting this Patent Policy, with its commitment to royalty-free standards for the future, we are laying the foundation for another decade of technical innovation, economic growth and social advancement." Bruce Perens, a prominent patent foe and a participant in the W3C's deliberations, applauded the move, while warning that the consortium had left its process vulnerable to "submarine" patents. "It's not bulletproof," Perens said in an interview on Wednesday. "But it's an improvement." Perens -- a cofounder of the Open Source Initiative who recently received a $50,000, or about £32,000, grant to fund his antipatent activism -- said that while the W3C patent policy represented a victory for patent-free standards and the open-source software development projects that rely on them, it also left the standards-setting process vulnerable in many ways. One such threat is the so-called submarine patent, which is a patent filed, but not granted, at the time a W3C technical recommendation is under construction. "(Patent holders) don't tell anyone about (the patent), and it becomes granted, and then it's the first time we can see it," Perens said. "We will try to watch out for people's patents. But patent searches are rarely conclusive, because patents are so poorly descriptive." The major variable in the patent-policy process, according to Perens, is identifying when royalty-encumbered technology has been "knowingly", or intentionally, submitted for standards consideration by a company. The W3C working group member representing that company may be ignorant of the royalty -- or may be kept ignorant by design. Perens -- who votes on the Patent Policy Working Group as an "invited expert", but who is still seeking a donor willing to pay for his W3C membership -- cited W3C rules in declining to say who had voted against the policy. But he did state that "among companies devoted to Linux and open source, there are some who have very large known patent portfolios who aren't always on our side." Microsoft, SAP and IBM -- which has made Linux a centrepiece of its strategy and has earned more patents annually than any other company for the past 10 years in a row -- are among the industry heavyweights that have bypassed the W3C because of its patent policy. Meanwhile, they have brought certain Web services specifications to the Organization for the Advancement of Structured Information Standards (OASIS) for development. IBM, in the awkward position of being between the wealth of its patent portfolio and the demands of open-source developers on whom it relies, declined to say how it had voted on the proposal. But an IBM representative said the company supported the finished policy. "IBM believes that the resulting patent policy is well-developed and defined, and is appropriate to attend to the needs of Web infrastructure vendors and users alike," representative Scott Cook wrote in an email interview. The new policy carves out an exception for the use of royalty-bearing patents whose technologies W3C working groups find they cannot work around. Incorporating the patented technology requires a vote of the W3C advisory committee and the approval of the consortium's director. Perens said that exception was his primary goal for raising the money to join the group as a full member. "Why would I want to be at W3C? Because of the escape valve," Perens said. "I want to be there to object if someone tries to use it." News.com's Lisa M. Bowman contributed to this report.

For everything Internet-related, from the latest legal and policy-related news, to domain name updates, see ZDNet UK's Internet News Section. Let the editors know what you think in the Mailroom.

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

ZDNet UK Live

How dare film makers, artists or anybody that invests in creativity stop us pirating their works for free. I want to be able to walk into my local...

32 minutes ago by JCB33 on ACTA stumbles in Germany

@GrueMaster. I prefer horses for courses rather than one size fits all. I, and I suspect most other computer users, do not really wish to have...

3 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint

The product that scares me every time I have to use it is the Office 2007 version of Excel. The first bug that I found was applying the median...

3 hours ago by greycynic on Ten flawed products that derail productivity

Nice review and very informative. One thing I'd like to add (in reply to whs001's 1st question), the main reason to have the same interface from...

4 hours ago by GrueMaster on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint

I'be been using Mint 12 since the RC came out, and I am far more happy with the Cinnamon, the Mate, and, yes (with extensions), theGnome 3...

5 hours ago by Frederick Wrigley via Facebook on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint

Excellent article. One small correction, though--although a fresh installation of Linux Mint 12 will, indeed, provide the user with a version of...

6 hours ago by bdantas on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

6 hours ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

6 hours ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material

For Gnome 2 die-hards, it is possible to add icons to the bottom panel (or top top panel, if you prefer) which provide the exact Gnome 2...

7 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint

Your comments would seem pretty naive and immature. Your 'solution' appears to be, "gee, let's all just give in to the hackers and give them...

7 hours ago by ramwellian on Cloud computing security: no more oxymoron?

"Interesting thought ... If you installed Win7 as a dual boot on a machine that previously only had Linux, and it wrecked your Linux installation,...

8 hours ago by BugStalker on Windows 7 Declares War on GRUB

This is an excellent summary of Ubuntu and Mint and the interface differences between them. Most such articles take a very partisan position for...

8 hours ago by whs001 on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint

@ewallace. Not so clear. Anyone can obtain the text, for example from here http://www.ustr.gov/webfm_send/2379. I support ACTA so long as it and...

8 hours ago by Moley on ACTA: Facts, misconceptions and questions

I think WinRT is fantastic. I just wish it was an option for people that didn't want to go through Microsoft's App Store with its attendant...

11 hours ago by 45283 on Why Windows 8 needs architectural hygiene for WOA

Nine people? £30m? Who's back pocket is that lot going in? And IF they say it is for new buildings, what about all the ones the government has...

12 hours ago by Burn-IT on Police set to launch three £30m e-crime hubs

Just to be clear, nobody knows what is in the text of ACTA, here is a photograph of the text of ACTA http://twitpic.com/8h9iju as submitted to the...

12 hours ago by ewallace on ACTA: Facts, misconceptions and questions

Unfortunately main issue is that ASUS is refusing to accept that they make some mistake on this version of asus Transformer prime. 1 - GPS sensor...

13 hours ago by fgvrg56 on Asus Eee Pad Transformer Prime Wi-Fi & GPS problems?

@Marcus A fair question. Just talked with Archos which said it was working on an announcement for next week....

14 hours ago by Ben Woods on Archos confirms G9 Ice Cream Sandwich update schedule

Any update on this, considering the claimed "first week of February"?

16 hours ago by Marcus Karlsson via Facebook on Archos confirms G9 Ice Cream Sandwich update schedule

Bill Goodrich : Just as al_langevin pointed out, with Windows Server 2008 there is no Services for Macintosh anymore. It's gone, not available....

24 hours ago by apexwm on Windows Server 2008 drops the ball for Mac compatibility

Featured white papers

Latest jobs

Web standards body finalises anti-patent policy

Daily Newsletters

Topics

Related stories

W3C bows to royalty-free pressure

Scientists protest EU software patents

Amazon makes Web-ad patent bid

Perens: Linux could learn from Apple

Post your comment

ZDNet UK Live

Latest in Application Development

Perens: Linux could learn from Apple

Featured white papers

Latest jobs

Test Analyst - Business Intelligence /Data Warehousing

Test Analyst - Business Intelligence /Data Warehousing

Technical MI Manager - 50-60k - Leeds

Inside ZDNet UK

A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint

2012 Predictions: VCE FastPath, VI SAN Probe & Hadoop

BlackBerry Bold 9790

Case study: How cloud enables growth

Ten factors that make Ubuntu 11.10 a hit

Toshiba Portégé Z830-10P Review

BT's archive: Pictures from the vault

News & Analysis

Reviews

Blogs

Resources

About Us

Member Services

Special Features

Advertising Features

ZDNet UK / News and Analysis / Application Development

Web standards body finalises anti-patent policy

Daily Newsletters

Topics

Related stories

Post your comment

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

Latest in Application Development

Featured white papers

Latest jobs

Inside ZDNet UK

Resources

About Us

Member Services

Special Features

Advertising Features