IT heavyweights eye the PeopleSoft pie

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

NEWS
Oracle surprised PeopleSoft on Friday with a $5.1bn unsolicited takeover offer. But before this saga reaches its denouement, might a white knight surprise with a counterbid of its own? Now that PeopleSoft has been put into play, the rumour mill has been in overdrive with IBM, SAP and Microsoft all mentioned by analysts as possible candidates. Patrick Snell, an analyst with Robert W. Baird & Co., wrote in a research note that he believes there could be a bidding war involving all three companies for PeopleSoft. Indeed, IBM, which had more than $5.5bn in cash and equivalents at the end of its March quarter, already has a long-standing joint-marketing deal with J.D. Edwards, which earlier this week announced it will be acquired by PeopleSoft. But the odds of a third party emerging from the shadows remain remote, some analysts say. "I can't see IBM getting involved in this," said Bruce Richardson, an analyst at AMR Research. "They have never been successful in the applications market. But they may not want to lose revenue from J.D. Edwards. Still, I can't imagine them doing that." W.R. Hambrecht analyst Richard Petersen agreed, saying he thinks IBM has little interest getting into the applications software business and that it's unlikely that another suitor will jump into the fray. "The only other possible bidder is SAP, and SAP benefits more from standing on the sidelines and watching the carnage than it does by acquiring PeopleSoft," Petersen said. "In any event, SAP does not have a history of making large acquisitions." Richardson initially viewed the Oracle bid as a ploy to derail the pending PeopleSoft-J.D. Edwards deal. He now believes Oracle's bid is genuine, especially given the calibre of the company's advisers. The company recently hired Chuck Phillips, a former Morgan Stanley software analyst, as an executive reporting to and advising Oracle chief executive Larry Ellison. "I can't think that Chuck Phillips would advise Ellison to do this if it wasn't for real," Richardson said. "He wouldn't (mess) with Wall Street." PeopleSoft, like a number of other companies, has a policy in place to make it more difficult for hostile suitors to take over. Often referred to as a "poison pill", the provision calls for more shares to be unleashed -- thereby making it more expensive for an unwanted suitor to acquire the company. PeopleSoft has not yet officially turned down Oracle's offer, though Craig Conway, chief executive of the software maker, dismissed the takeover bid as "atrociously bad behaviour from a company with a history of atrociously bad behaviour." Of course, that may be the opening shot in a campaign to convince Oracle to sweeten its offer. It could also be a prelude to an official rejection. Hostile takeovers in businesses like the software industry are rare, because the prize assets -- employees -- can walk out the door if they don't like the new management. That conventional wisdom could be get put to the test, however, considering that Ellison has made it clear that Oracle has no intention of keeping PeopleSoft alive as a separate brand, should the deal go through. Other companies have taken special steps to avoid bad blood during takeovers. For instance, when IBM launched an unsolicited $3bn takeover of Lotus Development in June 1995, Big Blue chief executive Lou Gerstner, who coveted Lotus Notes' groupware product, paid a special visit to Massachusetts to woo the company's star developer, Ray Ozzie. What's more, Gerstner sweetened the offer to $3.5bn to help clinch the agreement. "Our initial reaction was: How do we fight it?" recalled Richard Eckel, then-director of communications at Lotus. "That very quickly transitioned. Then the strategy became: How do (we) get more money?" Money is often the deciding factor for takeovers. In 1995, SoftKey International launched an unsolicited bid for the Learning Company. Broderbund also had put in a bid to buy the company, but SoftKey ultimately won the bidding war with a $607m deal. The postscript came in June 1998 when SoftKey, which by then had taken the Learning Company name, bought Broderbund for $420m in stock. Computer Associates launched a hostile $9.8bn cash bid in 1998 for consulting firm Computer Sciences. But Computer Sciences' board rejected the offer as insufficient, and Computer Associates gave up after a month of trying. In a twist, Computer Associates found itself on the receiving end of a hostile offer by Texas financier Sam Wyly a couple years later. Wyly sought to break up the company into four separate businesses. But after a bitter proxy battle to replace the board of directors, shareholders stuck with Computer Associates' management. CNET News.com's Ian Fried, David Becker and Mike Ricciuti contributed to this report.
See the Finance News Section for the latest financial news in the high-tech sector. Let the editors know what you think in the Mailroom.

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

Moley

@GrueMaster. I prefer horses for courses rather than one size fits all. I, and I suspect most other computer users, do not really wish to have...

2 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
greycynic

The product that scares me every time I have to use it is the Office 2007 version of Excel. The first bug that I found was applying the median...

2 hours ago by greycynic on Ten flawed products that derail productivity
GrueMaster

Nice review and very informative. One thing I'd like to add (in reply to whs001's 1st question), the main reason to have the same interface from...

3 hours ago by GrueMaster on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Frederick Wrigley

I'be been using Mint 12 since the RC came out, and I am far more happy with the Cinnamon, the Mate, and, yes (with extensions), theGnome 3...

4 hours ago by Frederick Wrigley via Facebook on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
bdantas

Excellent article. One small correction, though--although a fresh installation of Linux Mint 12 will, indeed, provide the user with a version of...

5 hours ago by bdantas on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

5 hours ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

5 hours ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Moley

For Gnome 2 die-hards, it is possible to add icons to the bottom panel (or top top panel, if you prefer) which provide the exact Gnome 2...

6 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
ramwellian

Your comments would seem pretty naive and immature. Your 'solution' appears to be, "gee, let's all just give in to the hackers and give them...

6 hours ago by ramwellian on Cloud computing security: no more oxymoron?
BugStalker

"Interesting thought ... If you installed Win7 as a dual boot on a machine that previously only had Linux, and it wrecked your Linux installation,...

7 hours ago by BugStalker on Windows 7 Declares War on GRUB
whs001

This is an excellent summary of Ubuntu and Mint and the interface differences between them. Most such articles take a very partisan position for...

7 hours ago by whs001 on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Moley

@ewallace. Not so clear. Anyone can obtain the text, for example from here http://www.ustr.gov/webfm_send/2379. I support ACTA so long as it and...

7 hours ago by Moley on ACTA: Facts, misconceptions and questions
45283

I think WinRT is fantastic. I just wish it was an option for people that didn't want to go through Microsoft's App Store with its attendant...

10 hours ago by 45283 on Why Windows 8 needs architectural hygiene for WOA
Burn-IT

Nine people? £30m? Who's back pocket is that lot going in? And IF they say it is for new buildings, what about all the ones the government has...

11 hours ago by Burn-IT on Police set to launch three £30m e-crime hubs
ewallace

Just to be clear, nobody knows what is in the text of ACTA, here is a photograph of the text of ACTA http://twitpic.com/8h9iju as submitted to the...

11 hours ago by ewallace on ACTA: Facts, misconceptions and questions
fgvrg56

Unfortunately main issue is that ASUS is refusing to accept that they make some mistake on this version of asus Transformer prime. 1 - GPS sensor...

12 hours ago by fgvrg56 on Asus Eee Pad Transformer Prime Wi-Fi & GPS problems?
Ben Woods

@Marcus A fair question. Just talked with Archos which said it was working on an announcement for next week....

14 hours ago by Ben Woods on Archos confirms G9 Ice Cream Sandwich update schedule
Marcus Karlsson

Any update on this, considering the claimed "first week of February"?

15 hours ago by Marcus Karlsson via Facebook on Archos confirms G9 Ice Cream Sandwich update schedule
apexwm

Bill Goodrich : Just as al_langevin pointed out, with Windows Server 2008 there is no Services for Macintosh anymore. It's gone, not available....

23 hours ago by apexwm on Windows Server 2008 drops the ball for Mac compatibility
txtrainguy

Replying to an old topic that I'm currently facing with my CEO (who is on a Mac). Our servers are primarily Windows Servers, office is about...

1 day ago by txtrainguy on Windows Server 2008 drops the ball for Mac compatibility

Latest in Application Development