XML: Extremely critical or exhaustingly complex?

SPECIAL REPORT


























































































XML: Extremely critical or exhaustingly complex?


Andrew Donoghue



XML has the potential to revolutionise data exchange but the myriad standards and specifications surrounding the meta-language could seriously discourage users in the short-term



"The impact of XML on our daily lives and business processes is going to be felt in waves over the next 20 years. Ignoring XML now is like ignoring the World Wide Web in 1993 or ignoring client server in 1989."




Charles Abrams' views on XML may sound grandiose -- for a Gartner research director with 21 years in the industry -- but he’s not alone in his zealous support of the meta-language. Bill Gates proclaimed back in 2000 that the industry and Microsoft "should build their futures around XML".



While it seems that Microsoft has followed the advice of its glorious leader, with the .Net platform built entirely around XML’s cross-platform features, end-user organisations, while enthusiastic about the potential, are being a little more circumspect with actual deployments.




This hesitation has probably got a lot to do with the relative immaturity of the meta-language. The fragmentation in XML standards and specifications can be intimidating to the uninitiated and potentially damaging to anyone using XML for mission-critical operations.




Since XML first emerged from the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) in 1998, the number of XML-associated standards has accelerated at a phenomenal rate. Late last year Gartner issued a report warning that unless there is a major change in the way XML-defined standards are developed, it will cost businesses dearly in the long run.




"At the very least, the proliferation of standards could result in millions of dollars in lost effort for organisations utilising the meta-language; at worst it will corrupt data and compromise business-critical transactions and operations because different parts of the same company will process conflicting XML messages without knowing it," the report concluded.




Gartner predicts that, from 2001 to 2004, companies will spend more than $3bn worldwide on XML modelling activities with no return on $2bn of it.




The problem lies with the lack of rules on how an XML standard should be developed. For example, TaXML, an XML standard relating to the lifecycle of a tax case, and Value Chain Markup Language (VCML) were originally developed by single companies. The fact that one company can create a standard is a contradiction in terms but there is nothing to stop it happening.




"There are so many specifications under development in XML right now that no one can keep track of them. There are hundreds of them," said Gartner's Abrams.









Next page

























































Talkback

Nothing new here. When was this article written? This article could easily be a reprint from a couple of years ago.

5 August, 2003 21:20 Reply

I agree...the concept of XML started of with the idea that it is visually easier to read and expandable from a programmatic manner. Along with the schemas, it was supposed to be easier for everyone to interpret and present the data systematically.

However, reality is that the standards for some XMLs specify so many fields that ultimately the end users have to chose which fields work for them and again define how they are going to interpret each field regardless of what the standards specify. This is just like transferring data the old way - binary or even CSV.

6 August, 2003 01:29 Reply

Does anyone actually listen to the Gartner Group or it's analysts?

The analyst in this case says that anyone can develop an XML standard and that in his view
this can be a real problem.

That's the whole point.

Anyone can define how they want their data to be organized and define a schema to clarify what rules the data must follow. The most important thing though is that these various rulesets can be easily identified by the use of namespaces.

Namepsaces combined with schemas make any concern about different standards mostly irrelevant.

If every company in an industry defines their own schema/namespace then it may take some time for them all to come to some agreement.

Fortunately, what is more likely to happen is that the first few to bring a solution into play will allow the remaining players to compare the merits and perhaps agree on one that best meets their needs.

Ultimately, this will weed out the less useful schemas and allow the most valued one to dominate.

6 August, 2003 20:30 Reply

XML is neither complex or new -- perhaps to someone that doesn't work with data on a regular basis, but such people should not be the standard by which technology is judged. SGML has been around for 25+ years, and XML is little different. We have finally moved to a point where there are platforms available to structure data in a way that can be filtered and interpreted by interchange modules and passed to business partners--all I see in this article are complaints that it doesn't happen instantaneously and effortlessly. Listen, if that's what you're looking for, then there should only be one software company and the government (perhaps the United Nations) should set data structure in stone with their own standards...if the complete nonsense of such a suggestion isn't obvious, you are in big trouble my friend.

7 August, 2003 15:57 Reply

The landscape is changing making it easier for the average person to do XML.

The answer is in templates and patterns that
fit common re-usable models.

The new VisualScript product from Smartdraw fits this bill, as does technologies like the CAM templating approach from the OASIS CAM team, and of course Microsoft is pinning its hopes on InfoDocs

Crossing the gap between the technical world of the XML saavy to the real world of end users is the key. HTML did this - now XML needs to find its way.

8 August, 2003 21:18 Reply

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in

Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

ZDNet UK Live

expert_lectures

HR in the UK Bill Kutik on HR Collaboration Options: By Oliver Marks | September 5, 2010, 6:02pm... http://bit.ly/9q2dmG expertlectures.com

SoFrank

Jack, I hereby nickname you "Ebenezer." Leorising, I *totally* trust some obscure search engine with no transparent revenue stream to be honest and...

3 hours ago by SoFrank on Google’s Buckyballs doodle costs people money, drives users away
InfoGuruShop

BBC I Player - could launch Monday http://bit.ly/b8DgJp

mapyourbrand

New iPlayer to launch, with social features... Social TV will be interesting! http://bit.ly/diCEYW

mikecane

Google’s Buckyballs doodle costs people money, drives users away http://t.co/K7VmmHu <- HA! That didn't affect OPERA for me at all! Irony!

jtroll

Google Doodles are terrific examples of creativity for creativity's sake... except when they overheat your machine: http://bit.ly/aC1rqL

leorising

Switch to Startpage: http://www.startpage.com/eng/download-startpage-plugin.html You can add them to your pulldown search list in firefox, dunno...

7 hours ago by leorising on Google’s Buckyballs doodle costs people money, drives users away
BrianExCIS

The Nano is a real backwards step, too small and fiddly if you're over 40 and with reduced functionality. I'm going to put a 32GB SDHC card in my...

8 hours ago by BrianExCIS on New iPods, revamped Apple TV arrive
Stjepan

"I'd rather have the time back that I spent reading this article." Second to that. What computer you are using there? Very interesting, my three...

8 hours ago by Stjepan on Google’s Buckyballs doodle costs people money, drives users away
Stjepan

"I'd rather have the time back that I spent reading this article." Second to that. What computer you are using there? Very interesting, my three...

8 hours ago by Stjepan
chokha

String theory gets entangled in quantum computing http://bit.ly/cFWmmv

rpreibold

String theory gets entangled in quantum computing: ... Imperial College London think they have found a way to test... http://bit.ly/cIEKw7

Socmediadigest

#RT #SM #SocialMedia BBC iPlayer: social media and the public interest: Ah, yes, but social media so... http://bit.ly/aZEYQN #social #media

adam_ps

.@jackschofield on the surprising (to me) cost of Google’s Buckyballs doodle: http://bit.ly/dvpIDq On ZD Net

macmanblack

John Ross on retail market behavior...and social media http://bit.ly/95qJAd

Ezbizs

New iPods, revamped Apple TV arrive: ZDNet UKBy Staff, CNET News, 3 September, 2010 17:58 On Wednesday in Sa... http://tinyurl.com/236h64g

macmanblack

BBC iplayer going social http://bit.ly/95qJAd

DarrenZahradnik

Interesting: BBC iPlayer: social media and the public interest http://bit.ly/cv6amU

SocialMediaXprt

RT @DarrenZahradnik: Interesting: BBC iPlayer: social media and the public interest http://bit.ly/cv6amU http://bit.ly/9gHQfH

GloriaEdwards12

BBC iPlayer: social media and the public interest: By Rupert Goodwins, 5 September, 2010 17:42 The BBC is preparin... http://bit.ly/aISQLf

Featured white papers

SunGard Aquires Hosting 365

A synopsis of SunGard's acquisition of 365 Hosting Limited, a Dublin, Ireland-based cloud computing and data centre services company..

Download now

HP Managed Print Services deal yields 40 percentcost saving at Merck Sharp & Dohme Italia SpA

Merck Sharp & Dohme Italia SpA wanted to consolidate its ageing, unmanaged print, copy and fax fleet and introduce a Managed Print Service (MPS) solution to drive down costs.

Download now

Real-Time Protection for Hyper-V

Server virtualization is a hot topic in the IT world because of the potential for providing serious cost savings for customers.

Download now