Bill Goodrich :
Just as al_langevin pointed out, with Windows Server 2008 there is no Services for Macintosh anymore. It's gone, not available....
Replying to an old topic that I'm currently facing with my CEO (who is on a Mac). Our servers are primarily Windows Servers, office is about...
Sure, that makes perfect sense. Pay wrong-doers money and thank them for breaching your security and pointing out your flaws, that would surely...
I think he's referring specifically to Android apps, as Apple do regulate their App Store, but Google seem to let any old crap onto the Android store!
Keep the crap apps out?! How will they compete with Android and Apple's claim to fame of having so many life changing apps?
I wonder if the media...
It has been shown time after time that if there is an author store that sells the songs at even 1$ per song and gives you a high-quality digital...
""As a result of Butyka's alleged conduct, researchers were unable to use the computers for more than two months while NASA removed the malicious...
It simultaneously worries me and uplifts me that a self-proclaimed group of internet activists name themselves after Indian mythical figures....
It's actually far easier to work anonymously on the internet than you think. With tools like Tor bouncing your traffic around the world before...
1000272134 and bluedalmatian
with you both there but then I'm still in 10.04 land (and happy with it)
Interesting article and definitely see your points on the products mentioned. One of the top products for our Help Desk (approximately 20% of all...
Absolutely - this should obviously not be handled my isp - but handled by their hosting operator.
What's been suggested here is that my isp police...
Looks like a great phone. I don't notice any deficiencies in WP7. used IOS before, that's pretty good. I don't spend much time in Apps, all i need...
Now with the help of these apps you are always synced with MS outlook while on the move. Just download apps like xobni or outlookreflex and get...
Your details are wrong. The version currently being made is the one with 2 USB ports, 256MB RAM and a network port. This is the Model B.
The...
The thing that has been puzzling me for quite a while is how Anonymous can remain anonymous whilst not only being active on the Internet but also...
If what Semantec is saying is rue, that is even worse and shows a complete disregard for thier users.
If what Anonymous claims is true and the...
Didn't seem particularly biased to me either. Oh though you might have mentioned some other competitors with free search and email services...
James - exactly as much as anyone paid you for your comment; I don't feel that I need to say that I'm independant and unbiased, but just for you...
Once they realise symantec are willing to pay real money, they will simply keep extorting, unless of course symantec/authorities can use the...
Talkback
I have been waiting for 13 years for microsoft to fix their calculator in windows so it does not suprise me that they needed outside help to solve this problem.
Calculator 100,000 * 6% / 365
If you are paying that intrest daily you are in big trouble.
Enough said!!
Well it is about time. MS started to give in for the benefit of the users. This isn't going to hurt them is it? May be it is time for MS to join and welcome OSS. Way to go FLOSS
It defies logic. Not the worm but Microsoft's Choice. Didn't they buy SCO licence just a few weeks ago? I wonder why they didn't use SCO Unix?
HA HA HA HA HA!!!!!!!!!!!!
hahaha. that must be a blow to microsoft executives' egos.
M$ must be eating tons of crow: What a tacet admission by M$ that it is totally insecure by design; that their vaunted Software Security Program is nothing more than a bunch of Hot Air. They don't even believe enough in their own product to secure it so that they can't be attacked. If M$ can't secure their own product so that it can't be attacked, then nobody can. What hypocrisy emanates from Redmond: M$ is ready for the Enterprise??? I don't think so -- they have to rely upon a company that runs a REAL OS they have claimed is a "Cancer" and many other unflattering things.
The BEST thing Bill Gates could do is take his tinker toy and go home and produce an OS for all those "Home Users" and stay away from the Enterprise -- clearly M$, in spite of all its hot air, is NOT ready for the Enterprise, and worse only puts any enterprise that runs M$ Bugware in jeopardy.
Bill Gates: GO HOME!!! Come back when you actually GROW UP!!!
May the SOURCE be with GNU
I think the headline speaks volumes. enough said.
Well now it would seem to me that ol M$ themselfs are sayin the ideal patch for computers runnin the M$ Latest & Greatest is quite simply spelt Linux OOOooooooohhhh i like the sound of that Linux Linux Linux Linux you know i could type that all night long..he he he ...
Sensationalism.
Iam a one-eyed GNU/Linux lover and MS-hater like most people in the Open Source community, but this isn't news.
Microsoft are a big target and they employed the services of a proven-to-work caching company to help keep their website available to their customers.
Microsoft would be morons to try to setup a similar infrastructure (at great expense) using Windows boxes just because Akamai use Linux.
Don't get me wrong, I'm a linux enthusiast. I've got a linux server at home, at work. My home desktop is linux, and I'm just about to set up a Linux computer lab for my kids' primary school. I'm no Microsoft apologist and I like reading LinuxToday to keep track of Linux conversions.
But.
In this case, the '40,000 distributed servers' is the significant fact of the article. It's irrelevant whether they are running Windows, Linux, MacOS or whatever, Microsoft are just spreading the target for a DDOS attack rather than putting up a single machine of their own which could be flooded easily. If they were running this server and chose Linux, that would be a story.
The irony is still sweet, though.
Just because microsoft is using a Linux system to protect their servers in no ways means linux is superior, just different. As microsoft stated, they want their customers to be able to get ahold of the updates they need. The fact that microsoft would use a rivals software to do this just shows that they are better people than people think.
I think that it's great that people from Microsoft found a way to solve the problem, even if it means being laughed at.
Microsoft is not afraid to use other operating systems to do their biddings. In the past, hotmail was run from FreeBSD boxes.
Also, Microsoft did not employ Linux boxes to protect itself, rather it used Akamai's network (and consequently their cache servers - which just happen to run linux) to protect it's own network. It may seem like semantics but consider this; Akamai's 15,000 cache servers spread around the globe make it fundamentally a better way to deflect a DDoS attack.
IT's so funny to see Microsoft's behaviour! The master of the masters using his rival software! Be careful, the people can change their OS. Microsoft, be honest: you're not the best!
It seems that Microsoft is running from their own fart.
It's a great move from the MS perspective. Now those who are targetting MS has to go the other way round. Means the people who are envy of windows have to break down the linux. Great thinking. Tht's y they are the leaders.
Talk about spin! MIcrosoft choose Akamai because of their [Akamai/Level3.net] large capacity network infrastructure, period! Linux, has nothing to do with the DNS change by Microsoft, and you know it. Your constant Microsoft bashing shows just how little you understand the Internet, or just how much you hate Bill Gates. I would venture it is a little of both.
M$ stuff is just plain junk. 2000 was said to be stable and safe. haha. i really hope people who run servers take a hard look at this, with M$'s record, linux is a better choice. M$ puts out soo many patches, you can bet their are more demons waiting to be exploted. I supose I must live in a cave, M$ just smells bad.
Well, Honeslty I don't know who this company that caches page but, I see 2 advantages to this.
1) M$ doesn't have to pay for as much bandwith.
2) Microsoft is protected from a direct attack.
Now honestly if I were this company, I would have cut M$ off for abusing the system.
I have been wating for this day, that the reply from Microsoft is a UNIX or a BSD base. Honestly we all know windows is weak on security, probably are vulnerable still to some of there own known attacks.
I only see one reason for routing through a system you down own when ya obviously have the bandwith, your fearing a direct access attempt.(lets face it crackers/script kiddies arn't to bright, they use domain names, instead of ip#'s or a combination of the two, to attack a system, this will send all attacks to the cache server instead of the M$ servers, protecting them, allowign transactions to compleat w/o most users knowing they are using a cache system, or noticing a server failure should one occure.
Someone wrote this thingie ->>>
Talk about spin! MIcrosoft choose Akamai because of their [Akamai/Level3.net] large capacity network infrastructure, period! Linux, has nothing to do with the DNS change by Microsoft, and you know it. Your constant Microsoft bashing shows just how little you understand the Internet, or just how much you hate Bill Gates. I would venture it is a little of both.
But I ask: why doesn't M$ use their own systems? I'm understanding by that action that M$ isn't capable of resolving it's problem by it's own. Shame on him, such a big boy.
This shows that Microsoft do not have much faith in their own server software, if they have to resort to using linux software on their own server. This shows that Microsoft, themselves believe that Linux, is the better software for running servers.
Very funny!
I wonder why Big Bll decided not to use NT ? Because its not as secure and 5 years behind Sun, that's why...
There is only one reason why MicroSoft is still in power, Linux does not do games (I know, I know but util you can buy enter the matrix for RedHat WinDoze will always be there...)
Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Linux, has nothing to do with the DNS change by Microsoft, and you know it. Your constant Microsoft bashing shows just how little you understand the Internet, or just how much you hate Bill Gates. I would venture it is a little of both.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No it is u who do not understand the software change dose prove that MS is not the best OS for servers and that linux always has been... why do 95% of IT use linux as the web servers??? and now more then 43% servers full stop...
And as for not understanding the internet linux was built for the internet from the start and win started with only standalone views....