Big Blue has heavily promoted the open-source operating system for use on servers, but Sam Docknevich of IBM's Global Services group plans to discuss how Linux's popularity now has spilled over into the desktop market, according to the agenda for the Desktop Linux Conference in Boston.
Docknevich's speech is titled, "The time is now for Linux on the desktop."
That's a significant change from August, when Irving Wladawsky-Berger, a senior executive who led Big Blue's Linux effort in the past, spoke on desktop Linux: "There is a strong buildup of interest, but I don't think this has quite achieved escape velocity."
Until now, IBM has favoured Linux for use on servers, which are networked machines for data storage and processing that typically are run by technically proficient administrators. The company has avoided pushing Linux for desktop computers, where Microsoft is overwhelmingly dominant.
However, IBM is likely to take a cautious approach to desktop Linux similar to that of Sun Microsystems and Red Hat. Those companies argue that desktop Linux is most appropriate when the computer user is performing a defined set of tasks.
There's an opportunity for desktop Linux in "running a fixed-function machine like a kiosk or ATM, a transactional workstation like a bank teller's station, or a basic office workstation that runs applications that drive business processes," the IBM agenda information said.
It's significant that an executive from IBM's Global Services group is the one making the case for desktop Linux, not someone from a product group, said Illuminata analyst Gordon Haff. It could indicate that IBM now sees Linux on the desktop as something it will help offer when customers ask for it, rather than something IBM aggressively pushes.
Some companies are taking a more aggressive approach by trying to steer average computer users toward Linux. Those companies include Xandros, Linare, Lycoris, Lindows and NeTraverse.
Novell, which this week announced a plan to acquire No. 2 Linux seller SuSE, also plans to attend the conference. So do Red Hat, Xandros, NeTraverse, the Security-Enhanced Linux group, OpenOffice and KDE.
Talkback
Speaking as a techno-naif, Linux has several attractive features vis-a-vis Windows. I've had it installed at various times on my desktop and my notebook computers. But in order for Linux to captivate a significant share of the desktop market, someone has to groom it for the backwards technology segment. It is, plain and simply, far from user friendly to install and use. The various apps have been named for the convenience of the Linux-geeks, not for the general market. Having to learn a relatively vast array of computerese before one can even attempt to load Linux is too discouraging for those who simply want an interface for doing their regular jobs. And forget about general driver support. Only the digitally-endowed set have access to audio/video support in Linux. If frustration and helplessness are desired lifestyles, get Linux on your box. Otherwise, wait for the Linux developers to move beyond their self-indulgent somnambulism and begin to address the needs of the typical end-user. We are not geeks and nerds. We don't want to become geeks and nerds. We use these tools for actual work that is not computer-centered.
As a support representative that works for IBM supporting the iSeries, I wish that IBM would put it's employees where it's mantra is and put Linux on OUR desktops instead of Windows 2000.
SameTime, Lotus Notes, etc... all currently run under Linux in the WINE environment, and we would benefit by not only running on a real operating system, but by learning Linux as well. As well have to support it soon anyway, why not start NOW?