"Unity and GNOME 3 both abandon the old text-based cascading menus in favour of a graphical icon-driven system."
Point truly missed. Both use a...
whs001 - Thank you, I'm glad you liked the article.
I absolutely agree with you on your first point. I should perhaps have made it clearer that...
If we allow corporate interest to dictate the way our government circumvents due process against foreign entities then we should accept the same...
I totally dislike pirating of works, I fear that artists will be deterred from creating works if they think that they are going to get ripped off....
How dare film makers, artists or anybody that invests in creativity stop us pirating their works for free. I want to be able to walk into my local...
@GrueMaster. I prefer horses for courses rather than one size fits all. I, and I suspect most other computer users, do not really wish to have...
The product that scares me every time I have to use it is the Office 2007 version of Excel.
The first bug that I found was applying the median...
Nice review and very informative. One thing I'd like to add (in reply to whs001's 1st question), the main reason to have the same interface from...
I'be been using Mint 12 since the RC came out, and I am far more happy with the Cinnamon, the Mate, and, yes (with extensions), theGnome 3...
Excellent article. One small correction, though--although a fresh installation of Linux Mint 12 will, indeed, provide the user with a version of...
In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...
In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...
For Gnome 2 die-hards, it is possible to add icons to the bottom panel (or top top panel, if you prefer) which provide the exact Gnome 2...
Your comments would seem pretty naive and immature. Your 'solution' appears to be, "gee, let's all just give in to the hackers and give them...
"Interesting thought ... If you installed Win7 as a dual boot on a machine that previously only had Linux, and it wrecked your Linux installation,...
This is an excellent summary of Ubuntu and Mint and the interface differences between them. Most such articles take a very partisan position for...
@ewallace. Not so clear. Anyone can obtain the text, for example from here http://www.ustr.gov/webfm_send/2379.
I support ACTA so long as it and...
I think WinRT is fantastic.
I just wish it was an option for people that didn't want to go through Microsoft's App Store with its attendant...
Nine people? £30m? Who's back pocket is that lot going in?
And IF they say it is for new buildings, what about all the ones the government has...
Just to be clear, nobody knows what is in the text of ACTA, here is a photograph of the text of ACTA http://twitpic.com/8h9iju as submitted to the...
Talkback
Wintel versus Mainframe?
Of course it'll cost less. When you're dropping a million on new mainframe hardware (ram, drives, virtualization software), no amount of Windows licenses & MCSE's can overcome that kind of cost on a single, dual processor Intel box.
Do you believe that a single, dual xeon with one Windows OS instance can really outperform a single, dual z900 with 96 Linux OS instances? If so, I've got a bridge to sell you...
Oracle $80,000 Linux system. See Groklaw for details.
"The Giga study found that the biggest cost advantages of Microsoft products came in comparison to the cost of Linux-based products sold by monster software makers Oracle and BEA. According to the study, large corporations paid $80,000 for Oracle’s database, compared to less than $40,000 for Microsoft SQL; and they paid $60,000 to BEA for development tools, compared to $12,500 to Microsoft VisualStudio.net. Medium-size companies, the study found, enjoyed a savings of the same proportions.
"What would the cost savings look like if the companies that paid big bucks to Oracle and BEA had used free Linux-based databases and scripting tools such as PHP and MySQL? Giga doesn’t know, because, as Cormier explains, they didn't look at any such companies."
Microsoft is so pathetic, that it resorts to spreading lies, packaged as "information requested by customers". This is a sure sign that in reality the strategic planners at Microsoft are scared stiff of Linux. They can't buy it; they can't pervert it; they can't beat it. That leaves them with hurt egos! Take a punch Billy!
MS lower priced than free? my linux OS is updated/upgraded daily, using net sites available for no fee. the complete OS, including state-of-the-art mail, ftp, data and webservers, cost me 4 hours of download and install, and configure time. IT and user forums for problems or tech assist by the Community are readily available, also at no cost. your "tech assist desk" may have thousands "sitting" at it when you post your question.
and not all in Bangalore, India.
beat that, MS.
Cheaper? That's funny, I work on a computer I got for free. I downloaded linux for completely free (although I paid for 5 versions of windows before I called it quits) with a free aol trial, as well as other GNU free software include Koffice and OpenOffice and have no use for microsoft and the blue screen of death anymore.
Total Cost $0.00
VALUE: PRICELESS!
Linux as an operating system has:
1. Greater stability
2. Low cost of ownership
3. Greatest flexibility
4. Highest innovative potential
5. Highest security
6. Require technical resource on part of user
7. Require costlier hardware [as yet!]
8. Provide confidence to its users
Greatest hurdle to linux being low, "Expert support base" along with sabotage tactics by opponent OS [Under real threat!!!!!!!!].;
Most of its sabotage occurs at the level of OEM retailers who, in a way, discourage if not
intimidate prospective customers!
First of all, it all appears OK .........but goose smell comes as we analyse facts more closely
a kind of gang-up is being seen even in a poor devoloping country [now full fledged capitalist in spirit!!!!!!!!!!]. Linux developers must do something solid to take positive message with the help of media, beside burning midnight for selfless service of humanity. Another problem come from DRIVER incompatibility and KERNEL Lacking support at installation stages
Forgive me if i said anything that hurt anybody for any reason................totally unintentional........Enjoy Linux.......and its surprises
Linkus is free? Last I checked every enterprise buys from IBM, Redhat, Novel etc.. Redhat and its support is NOT free! In the real world their are migration costs, training costs, support cost, etc I also cant see running an enterprise with "message boards" as my support. In an enterprise the ability to sue to recover damages and SLA's are the norm.. Stop the BS about free...
We're not talking about the big Linux distributors here though, if the big guys would actually look a bit harder at Linux then they'd find the free ones and free support.
What a load of crap!!
They cannot be serious man!
I have been a Microsoft engineer (MCSE NT4/2000 + a few other MCPs) for over 12 years. I know this o/s inside out and that includes Win2K3. I teach and practoce the technologies. I have been running Linux (SuSE) for a few years in quite mission critical environments. I can see no basis in fact which supports the Microsoft thesis that Windows is 'cheaper' to run than Linux. It just is not true.
Windows provides the 'comfort-zone' environment that keeps millions of users happy everyday. The Windows server systems have their place. But if you want to run seriously large, critical networks, then yuo have no choice but to use Linux as your backend.
That's my story, and I am sticking to it.
Lies, lies, it is just plain clear that Microsoft will say and do anything including fabrications of reality. THe harder they try, the more obvious and clear they make the world go against their "solutions". It is amazing to see how so much wealth can bring down a once great organization.
"If you thrive for money, make sure you make good use of it. ".
I hope we get a higher help.
LOOK, LOOK, We found the way to cost LESS than our competition!!!!!!!. -Really? , MS= Yes, yes, look they cost nothing plus support which can be nothing. We can prove that we cost LESS than that...!!!!!!! ..
Really???
PS: If you keep reading and eating this stuff, do not complain later you were not warned.... OPEN IS MUCH BETER THAN CLOSE. How dificult is for you to understand that????
Microsoft techs... please don't get too angry about this next comment. Micro soft techs that work in enterprise environments do not like to work. They like to have support staff and people working for them at many levels. When a server crashes they don't want to do their job and fix it, they want to call their support team to show up in a van and do all the work. Linux IT costs are LESS if you hire internal IT people to work on your servers instead of letting some schmuck run your IT department for a big pay day and a quick work day who's idea of fixing your companies server is making a phone call to another group of techs.