ANALYSIS
Businesspeople also need to ditch the aura of ethical superiority that often surrounds discussions of open-source software, said Louis Nauges of Microcost, a French IT services and hardware company. Nauges said he has convinced numerous companies to make large-scale desktop migrations based solely on practical considerations such as cost and improved manageability.
"Large enterprises don't care about crusades," he said. "They want people to work more efficiently."
Linux also needs a greater variety of applications. While Linux is covered for important categories such as productivity software, many niche areas remain untouched, giving buyers another reason to stay with Windows, Wohl said.
"When we can really build out the ecosystem, then it will be time to get Linux fully alive for mainstream markets," Wohl said.
Among the stickiest of those specialty areas is gaming. While games regularly dominate rankings for the best-selling Windows-based software, they've barely made a dent on Linux.
Soaring production costs for top-tier games make it futile to try to convince big game developers to produce Linux titles, said Jay Moore, evangelist for GarageGames, which publishes games and game-creation tools.
Real momentum will have to come from independent developers, who can produce reasonably sophisticated games on slim budgets if given the right tools, Moore said.
While open-source partisans have a reputation as cheapskates when it comes to actually paying for software, Moore said his company has found Linux users increasingly willing to pony up for well-made games. "Having a business model is no longer a religious faux pas in the Linux market," he said.
Game developers are also learning to see past conventional wisdom that Linux titles are difficult to support, given the spotty record for Linux drivers among some major PC hardware manufacturers.
"We've been pleasantly surprised to find that our support costs are lower for Linux than any other platform we produce for," Moore said. "The Linux users tend to fix things themselves, which helps, and the hardware support has gotten a lot better."
Some factors standing in the way of desktop Linux may be beyond the control open-source developers, however. In countries where software piracy is common, it can be hard to get people to accept open-source products when slicker proprietary applications are essentially free and offer the added thrill of defying the law, Nauges said.
"That's a key issue for the Spanish people -- they like to do unlicensed copying of software," he said. "If you just give it away, where's the pleasure in that?"
Talkback
I migrated away from Windows and Windows related software personally about five years ago. Part of the reson for migrating was indeed the fact that the Linux Desktop environment is so much "slicker" (feature rich) than anything Windows has including the latest offering of XP. I think it strange that so much press comments on this issue. A Linux user feels confined and grossly limited on a Windows machine. I know because I work with Linux, Windows 98, Windows NT and XP at my work. Usability features such as "virtural desktops", "rollup windows", "advanced window placement", "window pagers", "multiple X window sessions", "remote X window sessions", and the list goes on and on, are things the average Linux user enjoys, things MS Windows lacks completely or only has the ability with addon (read additional cost) software. And the desktop environment is just the beginning of advanced usability features that Linux (and indeed other *nix's) have had for some time now. I use the KDE desktop manager on my Linux IBM Thinkpad and find it makes Windows XP feel very primitive. Windows is still good for games though ... but I have a Play Station 2 for that (I don't play computer games much in all fairness).
27 Apr 04 02:54 ReplyAnyway, when I see articles that make such comments about "slickness" and such, I have to wonder if the writer used a Linux desktop long enough to experience all the "slick" features. It takes a little while to brake out of the MS Windows box to explore the benefits of new, unthinkable (by MS users anyway) features found in Linux systems.
Just my 2 cents.
i have to agree with the other poster. in some ways Macs are slicker than Linux, in other ways Linux tops the Mac, but windows? the telletubbies/lego theme is slick? look at virtual desktops in Linux and Expose in OS X and then tell me that again, but try not to laugh.....
28 Apr 04 19:35 ReplyThe most discouraging thing about using Linux (as a current windows user) I found is the lack of support for newer hardware. The SUSE Linux 9.0 I use comes with very spotty support for wireless devices for example. It took me upwards of 3 weeks and countless re-installations to get my wireless device functioning - though barely, I still have to reconfigure it every time I reboot.
28 Apr 04 21:18 Reply