The two companies will start bundling RealNetworks' existing Helix Player on Monday and plan to offer upgrades to the upcoming RealPlayer 10 for Linux application when that product is introduced later this year. They also said they would work with RealNetworks to help integrate Helix with their own software. Media player applications allow people to open and run music and video files on their computers.
The adoption of the open-source media software by Red Hat and Novell comes against the backdrop of the European Union's ruling against Microsoft, under which the software giant was ordered to separate its competing application, Windows Media Player, from its flagship Windows operating system. RealNetworks, which is suing Microsoft, played a pivotal role in the EU case, testifying that Microsoft's policy of packaging its media player with Windows constituted an unfair market advantage.
The EU had originally asked Microsoft to introduce by Monday a version of its operating system that did not include the media player, but over the weekend postponed that order as the software maker appeals the ruling.
RealNetworks has been pushing hard to make its software the de facto media player for the open-source sector. Over the last year, it has released the source code for its Helix video and audio compression technology and Helix DNA media servers, which support file formats including MPEG-4 and Windows Media. In keeping with open-source practices, developers can use any piece of the Helix technology free for research or license it to produce commercial products.
Sony, for example, licensed Helix servers and audio-video compression software for its Altair home entertainment appliance.
Helix is the foundation for RealPlayer 10 for Linux, which includes both open-source components and commercial components such as SMIL, MP3, Flash, and RealNetworks' own RealAudio and RealVideo media formats. The company is already making a beta test version of the Linux media software, as well as its source code, available to the public.
Talkback
"In keeping with open-source practices, developers can use any piece of the Helix technology free for research or license it to produce commercial products."
Where are you getting your definition of 'open source'? Not from the Open Source Definition at opensource.org. According to that definition a developer cannot charge for the use of their code in commercial products and still call it open source code.
This seems to be a major misconception which is also found in the Jabber Foundation licensing documentation. Open source is still 'free software' - freely available code for free enterprise whether that be non-profit or commercial.