Homeless charity Alone in London spent less than £2,000 to set up a network of 30 PCs from scratch, compared to a similar-sized charity which spent £30,000 on building a network using proprietary solutions and new PCs, according to James Holland, who ran the project at Alone in London.
Holland said the network was based on Linux Terminal Server, a free open-source add-on package for Linux that connects low-powered thin client terminals to a Linux server. Applications appear to run on the clients but really execute on the server. Holland pointed out one advantage of this set-up is that software runs faster than it could if the clients were running as full PCs.
"The thing to remember is that thin-client PCs run over the network at the speed of the server -- so you can have old 486 or Pentium PCs running as fast as much more expensive computers," said Holland.
The main cost of setting up the network was the purchase of a dual Pentium 3 server at a cost of around £1,000. The rest of the PCs on the network use the original Pentium chip and were donated by a city firm. All Holland needed to do to revamp these was install network and PCI graphics cards bought online at a cost of less than £20 per PC.
The only other cost was less than £250 for the cable, connectors, crimper and switches of the network infrastructure - in total, the network cost under £2,000. The PCs on the network run Red Hat Linux 9, OpenOffice, Evolution for email and Mozilla for browsing, saving Alone in London further costs on licences for desktop applications.
Holland said the main problem he faced was resistance from the employees to an unfamiliar operating system. "People complained, 'It's not like my computer at home'," said Holland. "Everyone has Microsoft Windows at home so they weren't happy about using two different systems," said Holland.
His solution was simple: don't give users a choice. "You have to force people to use a new system -- if they have an alternative, they'll use that instead," said Holland.
Alone in London is not the only charity to have built a network on a tight budget. Max Hertzberg, a co-ordinator for training charity Seeds for Change, said that he built a network for seven users for less than £500.
Hertzberg bought a 1.5GHz server second hand for £300, £1,700 less than the market rate. Like Holland, he didn't bother buying new PCs -- but instead of getting a donation he ended up retrieving his from the rubbish.
"A lot of computers are chucked out by companies. Rather than buying computers, I fished seven (old Pentium machines) off a skip," said Hertzberg.
The only other cost that Hertzberg had was networking infrastructure. Seeds for Change used the same technology as Alone in London, setting up a network of thin client terminals linked to a Linux server.
Hertzberg agreed with Holland that the main advantage of this technology was that the old terminals run as fast as the server on the end. He said that the system also makes backups easier. "You don't have to back up all seven machines -- you only have to back up one server," said Hertzberg.






Talkback
My company has old Pentiums and a couple of 486 computers running windows and citrix to a Windows/Citrix server. Same concept, more expensive with windows licensing but then users at least are happy with Windows.
And duh, of course you save a ton of money if you have donated equipment. And um, did they factor in labor costs? Where?
A very nice option to follow. I think This is not only for Bissiness, but why not for home . I hope some distribution that includs this optional package to buit home networks.
Marty: Actually, I've found that whether or not people are pissy with linux depends on how quickly they get dropped into it. my library used linux on patron systems for almost 2 years before we put in the first linux terminal for the staff. I have two staff terminals now. some users always get windows, others can choose. why? because some of them have problems remembering to scroll the window down in AOL webmail to find the delete button. Others just want to get work done, and what OS they use isn't that important.
I *AM* the IT department at a small school as well as being the digital media lab teacher (6 courses / 4 curricula, including a very demanding video tech class) & I'm using Linux more and more... I don't have time for hard-to-use Linux distros, so I'm rebuilding our network infrastructure chosing from an array of available, easy-to-use Linux servers: SME Server, Karoshi, Tiny Sofa, CentOS & CD-bootable servers like Nexedi DLS, RedWall....
On the client-side I have an embarrasment of riches to be found at distrowatch.org, but some that come to the top are the CD-bootable Linuces like the Morphices, the Knoppices, Kiosk-CD distros Stallion/VFF Morphix & neat lite-weight distros like Xfld. Linspire offers a very tempting $500/year site license. For server-independent content-filtering I have $300 site license available in FilterGate, a very good adult content & ad blocker.
When Win XP Pro craps the MBR, Linux "System Rescue" comes to the rescue. When I need to clone a machine, Linux lets me clone 10 simultaneously over the network (try doing that w/ Norton Ghost with less than a $2000 license).
I have found easily 2 gigabytes of *FREE* software for Windows, including pro-grade project mgmt tools (Open Workbench), the wonderful Avid video editor, Photomosaique, the GIMP, Open Office, Abiword, Sodipodi (the list goes on...), TuxPaint, TuxTyping & oodles of good utilities that are utterly indespensible for Windows administration, including *AUTOMATED* software deployment tools (WOW!). ALL FREE!!! The list of available good & fully free desktop softwares on Linux is even greater (never mind all the server-side applications).
I will be literally able to ween most of our school off proprietary software where open source is "good enough" and where we need it, we can also enjoy bargains via outfits like techsoup (since we're a non-profit).
The best part is no Microsoft CALs, no server licenses, no MS validation crap. I can run Win98 apps within Linux via Bochs or WINE. This means that my scant & miniscule tech budget (less than $10K) can go a long way in terms of hardware purchases w/out buying software licenses. The students benefit in terms of better QOS, nicer systems, etc. We have the choice of buying the $200 Linux box or the $300 WinXP box from Walmart, and mixing and matching as we see fit.