Start-up aims at beating MS and Macromedia to next-gen Web Apps

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

ANALYSIS

To listen to David Temkin, you'd think the future was here already.

As chief technology officer of San Francisco start-up Laszlo Systems, Temkin is selling the idea that the long-predicted era has arrived in which software applications will live on Web sites rather than desktops.

Now Temkin is betting that a recent open-source gamble will propel his company's vision of Internet applications ahead of its formidable competition.

With the October release of Laszlo's core technology to an open-source development group it created, the company is trying to take on an established company, Macromedia, which is, in turn, going after the fiercest software adversary of them all -- Microsoft.

Microsoft's XAML language is designed to build Windows applications tied closely to the Internet. While some companies are already building XAML applications that run with Microsoft's .Net client, the proprietary XML dialect is meant for use with Microsoft's Longhorn operating system. While Longhorn has suffered chronic delays and isn't expected until the end of 2006, few doubt its impact will be significant once released.

More immediately, Macromedia is busy promoting its Flex server software, which runs Internet applications written in Macromedia's MXML language. Macromedia recently announced a free version of Flex for non-commercial applications and updated the software with new features.

Temkin recently spoke to ZDNet UK sister site CNET News.com about the company's view of the computing present and future, and why his sights are set on besting Macromedia.

Q: If Web applications are here already, what do we need Laszlo for?
A: There is still a serious gap in what Web applications provide. Today's Web applications are based on the page-by-page HTML model -- which was never designed to support applications -- and what the end user sees on the vast majority of Web sites is a series of flat pages, connected by links. This is an awkward way to drive an application.

Where Laszlo, Flex, and Longhorn fit in is in enhancing the power and productivity of these networked end-user applications by making them more application-like. These technologies can make existing Web applications more responsive and powerful. They can also enable applications that previously could not be realistically deployed as Web applications.

Help us digest this alphabet soup that's emerging. Microsoft is serving up XAML, Macromedia's got MXML, and you've got LZX.
LZX is Laszlo's client-independent XML description language for rich-client applications. The Laszlo Presentation Server compiles LZX into SWF (Macromedia's Flash format), which runs in any browser on any platform that has Flash 5 or later installed. In the future, LZX will be compiled into client formats other than SWF, such as Java and the .Net client.

MXML is Macromedia's Flash-based XML description language for rich-client applications -- this is the core of Flex. The Flex server compiles MXML into SWF, which runs in any browser on any platform that has Flash 7 installed. And XAML is Microsoft's Longhorn-based description language for rich-client applications. Unlike LZX or MXML, these applications are Windows-based, rather than Web-based, and more deeply integrated with the underlying OS and hardware.

What does putting your presentation server into open-source development do to help you compete? How did you distribute your software before?
We have open-sourced our whole platform. There's no poison pill -- no "if you're commercial, you pay us" -- anyone can use it.

Our software was licensed the way application servers are: on a per-server basis. The more you serve, the more concurrent users, the more you need to pay. That's the way Flex is licensed. But now that the source code is open and available, we're working on establishing alliances to get this platform, especially the LZX language, to be a standard. That benefits us and the industry because this is the open Web. It's open source. It runs everywhere and runs in any browser. XAML needs IE and .Net.

XAML and LZX are in slightly different categories. XAML is the new way of writing Windows applications. This is the new way of writing Web applications. There's a convergence, but we're still committed to working in any browser and running over the Web. XAML provides much tighter integration with the OS -- that's not what we're doing. We're doing Web apps. With LZX we compile into Macromedia Flash, and we're looking at .Net and Java. If we get the .Net thing running, you'd be able to write a single source code base which works on anything Flash Version 5 or later, and, when Longhorn ships, will run within the .Net environment. It spans those two worlds and we want to do the same thing with Java.

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

Freebies202

Duplicate comments are not made intentionally. Its very good to know that now you are keeping check on this problem because sometimes a commenter...

4 hours ago by Freebies202 on Microsoft fixes blog comments, speeds up blogs with open source
kevinmchapman

"the very significant number of users" and "many (most) of us" - you have no evidence for these statements. It is a fact that most users are saying...

12 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Marg Menzies Harrison

Another grammar faux pas is the improper use of "you". When sitting down down in a restaurant, for example, I get cringe when the waitress...

14 hours ago by Marg Menzies Harrison via Facebook on 10 flagrant grammar mistakes that make you look stupid
zdnetukuser

And NOW, folks, for Canonical's next trick... Kubuntu is late. Here's a pencil. Draw your own conclusions. cf.:...

14 hours ago by zdnetukuser on Linux Minterface
Moley

@kevinmchapman. The discussion here reflects the very significant number of users who really do like the traditional menu system and who wish to...

16 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

Er, no... It is an efficient means of finding the application/file/setting you need in one place. The icons are a simply a fallback for when you...

18 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

Isn't the provision of a text based search an admission by the developers that the mass of icons approach does not work? I don't need to use a...

19 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

"Unity and GNOME 3 both abandon the old text-based cascading menus in favour of a graphical icon-driven system." Point truly missed. Both use a...

20 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

whs001 - Thank you, I'm glad you liked the article. I absolutely agree with you on your first point. I should perhaps have made it clearer that...

20 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Dennis Nilsson

If we allow corporate interest to dictate the way our government circumvents due process against foreign entities then we should accept the same...

21 hours ago by Dennis Nilsson via Facebook on ACTA stumbles in Germany
GHar123

I totally dislike pirating of works, I fear that artists will be deterred from creating works if they think that they are going to get ripped off....

23 hours ago by GHar123 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
JCB33

How dare film makers, artists or anybody that invests in creativity stop us pirating their works for free. I want to be able to walk into my local...

1 day ago by JCB33 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
Moley

@GrueMaster. I prefer horses for courses rather than one size fits all. I, and I suspect most other computer users, do not really wish to have...

1 day ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
greycynic

The product that scares me every time I have to use it is the Office 2007 version of Excel. The first bug that I found was applying the median...

1 day ago by greycynic on Ten flawed products that derail productivity
GrueMaster

Nice review and very informative. One thing I'd like to add (in reply to whs001's 1st question), the main reason to have the same interface from...

1 day ago by GrueMaster on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Frederick Wrigley

I'be been using Mint 12 since the RC came out, and I am far more happy with the Cinnamon, the Mate, and, yes (with extensions), theGnome 3...

1 day ago by Frederick Wrigley via Facebook on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
bdantas

Excellent article. One small correction, though--although a fresh installation of Linux Mint 12 will, indeed, provide the user with a version of...

1 day ago by bdantas on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

1 day ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

1 day ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Moley

For Gnome 2 die-hards, it is possible to add icons to the bottom panel (or top top panel, if you prefer) which provide the exact Gnome 2...

1 day ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint

Latest in Application Development