A senior figure at the European Commission launched an outspoken attack on several major American IT firms on Monday, accusing them of exerting too much influence on the progress of the open source community.
Jesús Villasante, the head of software technologies at the EC's Information Society and Media Directorate General, said that big companies such as IBM, HP and Sun are just using the open source community as subcontractors rather than encouraging the community to develop independent commercial products.
"IBM says to a customer, 'Do you want proprietary or open software?' Then [if they want open source] they say 'OK, you want IBM open source.' It is [always] IBM or Sun or HP open source," asserted Villasante, speaking at a debate on open source innovation at the Holland Open Software Conference in Amsterdam.
"Companies are using the potential of communities as subcontractors — the open source community today [is a] subcontractor of American multinationals," added Villasante, who called on the open source community to develop more independence from these large companies.
"Open source communities need to take themselves seriously and realise they have contribution to themselves and society. From the moment they realise they are part of the evolution of society and try to influence it, we will be moving in the right direction," said Villasante.
Villasante's comments appeared to startle his fellow panellists, including James Baty, a vice-president at Sun. Experts have previously argued that major corporations such as IBM have made a valuable contribution by supporting open source software, as they have helped to persuade businesses and IT professionals that open source software is a credible alternative to proprietary options.
Baty did not respond directly to Villasante's comments, but said that companies such as his have a responsibility to contribute to the open source community. Sun contributes to a number of open source projects, including the open source productivity application OpenOffice.org.
"There are companies that are takers from the open source community, other companies are taking the attitude that they have to contribute," said Baty. "[Open source] should be seen as an opportunity, not as something to capture and abuse."
Villasante used his keynote speech earlier in the day to express concerns about the European software industry.
"What I think is that Europe doesn't have a software industry today — the only one we have today is in America. In the future we may have China or India. We should decide if we will have a European software industry in the future," he said.
Villasante argued that open source is vital to the development of the European software industry, but that its progress has been inhibited by pressure from intellectual-property lobbyists and the traditional software industry, and by the fragmentation of the open source community.
"Open source is a complete mess — many people do lots of different things. There's total confusion today," Villasante said.
A member of the audience pointed out that the European Commission was partly responsible for pushing through the software patent directive, which many believe will damage open source. Villasante responded that not everyone at the EC automatically supports this directive.
"Firstly, I'm not responsible for software patents — the software patent directive is managed by the director general of Internal [Market]. The opinion of the director general of Information Society [the division where Villasante works] is not necessarily the same as the director general of Internal."
Talkback
Of course they exploit it IBM uses it as another way to keep 100,000 consultants busy creating code to make open source useful in business. That is whay an open source desktop will never make it because the large companies do not see a return on investment any time soon so they will not spend any serious money on it. The Open source community has disappointed me by jumping on the Corporate bandwagon and the reality is it is just another software choice and guess what it is not always the best choice.
What is this guy smoking ? As long as the code is free, who cares who writes it ? If IBM wants to pour money in Linux, and they can make a living out of it, what is the problem ?
And 'not being responsible for softwarepatents' is nonsense. If you work for the EU, you are at least morally responsible. If he really was that worried about softwarepatents, he should fight that with every breath. See how fast the European software industry recovers after the true liberation of software.
SW patents will ensure that Europe doesn't gain a software industry. Moreover, all businesses that use ICT would be hurt badly by them. It's rather misleading or even disingenuous to keep framing the problem of sw patents as a developer issue.