Linux worm on the loose

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

NEWS

A new worm that propagates by exploiting security vulnerabilities in Web server software is attacking Linux systems, antivirus companies warned on Monday.

The worm spreads by exploiting Web servers that host susceptible scripts at specific locations, according to antivirus software maker McAfee, which has named the worm "Lupper".

Lupper blindly attacks Web servers, installing and executing a copy of the worm when a vulnerable server is found, McAfee said in its description of the worm.

A backdoor is installed on infected servers, giving the attacker remote control over the system. The server joins a botnet, according to McAfee.

The worm exploits three vulnerabilities to propagate: the XML-RPC for PHP Remote Code Injection vulnerability; AWStats Rawlog Plugin Logfile Parameter Input Validation vulnerability; and Darryl Burgdorf's Webhints Remote Command Execution Vulnerability, according to Symantec's online description of the worm.

The XML-RPC flaw affects blogging, wiki and content management software and was discovered earlier this year. Patches are available for most systems. AWStats is a log analyzer tool; a fix for the flaw has been available since February. Darryl Burgdorf's Webhints is a hint generation script; no fixes are available for the script, according to Symantec's DeepSight Alert Services.

McAfee rates Lupper as low risk. Symantec, which calls the worm "Plupii", rates it medium risk, but notes that the worm has not been widely distributed. The SANS Internet Storm Centre, which tracks network threats, reports some worm sightings.

Symantec and McAfee have updated their products to protect against the worm. If a system has been infected, Symantec recommends complete reinstallation of the system because it will be difficult to determine what else the computer has been exposed to, the company said.

Talkback

Use Linux .. it's safe ... LOL

via Facebook 8 November, 2005 12:49
Reply

Use Windows it's safer .. ROFL

A single, low distribution, low to medium risk Linux worm vs. how many thousand Windows virii ?!

(Not Anonymous)

via Facebook 8 November, 2005 16:07
Reply

My Linux boxes are safe. But then, I'm not running *any* of the three flawed packages. In fact, I'm not sure that any desktop Linux user would be running these packages. And they would need to be running all three buggy packages to be vulnerable to this worm anyway.

I have looked into my crystal ball of the bl**^Wextremely obvious, and predict that this worm isn't going to cause a lot of problems.

via Facebook 8 November, 2005 22:10
Reply

Bah!

Use a Mac and never have to worry....

via Facebook 8 November, 2005 22:22
Reply

Absolutely NOTHING is safe. There's always annoying criminals constantly finding (or making) security holes in software.

via Facebook 9 November, 2005 10:01
Reply

Well, Mr Anonymous (coward), if you use a proprietry piece of software or OS, then the criminals have already got their hands on your system. At least with GNU/Linux, you can see what the code is and what it is doing.

That's why it is called open source, the source code is OPEN for ALL to see. If there are any problems with the code, then it isn't shunted to some little known department for one or two people to work on and produce a patch in months, it is worked on by tens, hundreds or thousands of coders all over the world, who constantly review each other's submissions for holes.

The only pressure they have is to produce good code. No PR people spouting off about the "security" of their product, no marketing people pressuring them to get the product out before it is finished and no project managers cutting corners to get the product out on time while reducing the numbers of coders working on it.

I had a look at the numbers of linux viruses (and worms) out there in a virus database, and I discovered that this worm raises the number of these things on GNU/Linux by 10%. Imagine the uproar if the number of Windows viruses and malware went up by 10% overnight? Now, who is running the more secure systems again???

via Facebook 9 November, 2005 13:17
Reply

Occupation: IT Analyst
Comment: Use Linux .. it's safe ... LOL

Well maybe if you bothered to READ the rest of the article you would see IT IS SAFE unlike your AR** wipe windBloZe that has so many holes it defies counting ..

:-) you want to LOL then take a look at M$ Corp now there is a real LOL job

via Facebook 10 November, 2005 22:26
Reply

Use a Mac? I use an abacus. It gives me the same number of apps to easily complete my work. Even got two 5-button 'mice' thrown in.

via Facebook 3 December, 2005 22:25
Reply

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

kevinmchapman

"the very significant number of users" and "many (most) of us" - you have no evidence for these statements. It is a fact that most users are saying...

13 minutes ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Marg Menzies Harrison

Another grammar faux pas is the improper use of "you". When sitting down down in a restaurant, for example, I get cringe when the waitress...

2 hours ago by Marg Menzies Harrison via Facebook on 10 flagrant grammar mistakes that make you look stupid
zdnetukuser

And NOW, folks, for Canonical's next trick... Kubuntu is late. Here's a pencil. Draw your own conclusions. cf.:...

2 hours ago by zdnetukuser on Linux Minterface
Moley

@kevinmchapman. The discussion here reflects the very significant number of users who really do like the traditional menu system and who wish to...

4 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

Er, no... It is an efficient means of finding the application/file/setting you need in one place. The icons are a simply a fallback for when you...

6 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

Isn't the provision of a text based search an admission by the developers that the mass of icons approach does not work? I don't need to use a...

7 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

"Unity and GNOME 3 both abandon the old text-based cascading menus in favour of a graphical icon-driven system." Point truly missed. Both use a...

8 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

whs001 - Thank you, I'm glad you liked the article. I absolutely agree with you on your first point. I should perhaps have made it clearer that...

8 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Dennis Nilsson

If we allow corporate interest to dictate the way our government circumvents due process against foreign entities then we should accept the same...

9 hours ago by Dennis Nilsson via Facebook on ACTA stumbles in Germany
GHar123

I totally dislike pirating of works, I fear that artists will be deterred from creating works if they think that they are going to get ripped off....

11 hours ago by GHar123 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
JCB33

How dare film makers, artists or anybody that invests in creativity stop us pirating their works for free. I want to be able to walk into my local...

16 hours ago by JCB33 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
Moley

@GrueMaster. I prefer horses for courses rather than one size fits all. I, and I suspect most other computer users, do not really wish to have...

18 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
greycynic

The product that scares me every time I have to use it is the Office 2007 version of Excel. The first bug that I found was applying the median...

18 hours ago by greycynic on Ten flawed products that derail productivity
GrueMaster

Nice review and very informative. One thing I'd like to add (in reply to whs001's 1st question), the main reason to have the same interface from...

20 hours ago by GrueMaster on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Frederick Wrigley

I'be been using Mint 12 since the RC came out, and I am far more happy with the Cinnamon, the Mate, and, yes (with extensions), theGnome 3...

21 hours ago by Frederick Wrigley via Facebook on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
bdantas

Excellent article. One small correction, though--although a fresh installation of Linux Mint 12 will, indeed, provide the user with a version of...

21 hours ago by bdantas on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

22 hours ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

22 hours ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Moley

For Gnome 2 die-hards, it is possible to add icons to the bottom panel (or top top panel, if you prefer) which provide the exact Gnome 2...

23 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
ramwellian

Your comments would seem pretty naive and immature. Your 'solution' appears to be, "gee, let's all just give in to the hackers and give them...

23 hours ago by ramwellian on Cloud computing security: no more oxymoron?

Latest in Application Development