For open source to prosper, people need to stop thinking of it as "free" and instead think of it as "connected capitalism", delegates at an open source conference in London were told on Tuesday.
Speaking at the Open Source Business Conference, Sun Microsystems' chief open-source officer, Simon Phipps, said that open source had been focused for too long on sharing code instead of what he called "the enrichment of the commons".
The open source community needed to look to the lessons of capitalism and capitalists, said Phipps. And referring to the recent announcement that billionaire Warren Buffet was donating much of his wealth to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Phipps pointed out that "Warren Buffett is driving gold — he is creating wealth".
Expanding on his message, Phipps said that the message of open source was that "creating and maintaining a completely independent code base was ultimately self-defeating".
Instead, the future was in co-operation and in organisations preserving what was ultimately of value to them.
"This is not volunteerism," said Phipps. "It is directed self-interest, synchronised self-interest and there is nothing wrong with self-interest."
And Phipps took time out to take a swipe at some of the exhibitors at the conference who were selling professional advice on negotiating the open source "legal minefield".
"I disagree with those who say who say open source is a legal minefield," he said as he threw from the stage a brochure from one firm of lawyers. "If you think open source is a minefield you're doing it wrong."
But while Phipps was happy to be outspoken in his presentation, he was moved to silence in at least one area. In introducing Phipps, the conference chairman and vice president of the ECM company Alfresco, Matt Asay, said that he hoped that he was "going to hear today that Sun has decided to open source Java". Phipps remained silent on the subject.
Asay made his presentation a call to arms arguing that it was time for "Europe to re-assert itself in open source". There was no doubt that open source was "very, very big" in Europe, Assay said, quoting Gartner research that says that 81 percent of companies in Europe have deployed open source. However, he also warned that some of the initiative in business use was moving elsewhere.
The Open Source Business Conference has been run in the US before. This week's two-day conference in London is the first that had been held in the UK.
Talkback
The OSBC certainly *was* about self-interest.
Speakers were chosen not on merit, but on how much they coughed up in fees (starting at £6,000).
The organisation running it has nothing to do with Open Source.
The website is hosted on Windows and IIS.
Just another bunch of greedy opportunists trying to make a quick buck by jumping on the bandwagon. No commitment whatsoever, or even understanding of, what they were meant to be running a conference about.
If these were the most impressive ideas that came out of the day, then we certainly didn't miss anything!
Was ZD's reporter even in the same room?
Simon Phipps has responded to this hack job of an article with the following:
"In fact I said and routinely say nothing of the sort. [...] an intentionally provocative and ill-informed article by a ZDNet reporter who badly summarises the thrust of my keynote"
But then again, that's about what I expect from ZD.
Hi John,
Of course Colin was in the room.
I've seen Simon's response to the piece. We're confident that the quotes are accurate, and don't believe that the story misinterprets his conference speech.
Thanks,
Graeme
There hasn't been any gold driven in my direction, let alone my country or the rest of the EU. There's no wealth to be gained from some old guy half the world doesn't know depositing his stale money into a fund that's hardly being used to it's potential(s).
I am however gaining wealth from learning and working together with others when using Linux based operating systems and Open Source software - a wealth of knowledge and skills I can pass on to other persons in my future.
For that, Open Source should remain free as in freedom and universal as in independent.
Organisations should not preserve what is of value only to them, they should preserve what is of value to everybody, and there's still room for small amounts of self interest in there without neglecting anybody.
Provided you stay on the right path, that is.