Symantec blames VeriSign for Norton AV woes

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

Topics

Symantec, VeriSign

NEWS
Security-software firm Symantec on Friday blamed VeriSign for problems with its security products that left users' PCs unresponsive and unstable.

The problems caused a flurry of angry posts to the Symantec area of support forums from users saying they would ditch Symantec's Norton AntiVirus. Users of the Norton products reported that their PCs locked up or slowed down after downloading the latest virus definitions on Wednesday and Thursday. Symantec itself reported that "after January 7th your computer slows down and Microsoft Word and Excel will not start."

But rather than Norton AntiVirus, Symantec said in a statement on its site that the problem "appears to be related to VeriSign receiving an unusual number of requests by Windows-based clients to download a certificate revocation list (CRL) on January 7-8, 2004. This increase in traffic resulted in intermittent VeriSign CRL server availability."

Norton AntiVirus products routinely verify the integrity of system components using certificates issued by VeriSign. Neither Verisign nor Symantec could immediately explain the exact sequence of events, but according to the statement on Symantec's site copies of Norton AntiVirus installed on PCs were unable to achieve the authentication they required due to the unavailability of VeriSign's server. "Therefore customers experienced delays and instabilities," said Symantec.

Hinting that it was not the only company whose products were affected, Symantec said it "and other vendors" were "cooperatively working with VeriSign to mitigate this situation."

Symantec issued a quick fix for the problem, which involves deselecting the option in Internet Explorer to check for publisher's certificate revocation.

Despite Symantec's protests that it is not to blame, the episode has created bad publicity for its Norton AntiVirus product. "I am now strongly tempted to trash Norton AV in favour of something more user-friendly and which doesn't slow down the opening of every damned thing in sight!" said one poster. "I have been having 16-plus second delays if I right-clicked on anything - even after a system reboot," wrote another. "I am not happy and have installed Sophos instead." This individual then went on to say they were not happy with that either "as updates seem incredibly confusing... I shall now try McAfee."

Update: Late on Friday, Verisign posted an explanation on its site, and said that the problem with the Certificate Revocation List, which affected Norton AntiVirus, was not connected to the Intermediate CA expiration issue, which caused problems for secure Web sites at about the same time last week.

The company said that requests to its server at crl.versiign.com suddenly increased one hundred-fold due to Windows clients trying to download the CRL. "We immediately took steps to increase capacity and determine the root cause," said VeriSign, and "within 24 hours, had increased capacity on crl.verisign.com ten-fold to handle this increased request load."

"VeriSign regrets any inconvenience that may have resulted from this period of increased demand," said the company in its statement. "In addition to increasing capacity, VeriSign has made certain modifications to the CRL distribution logic to more effectively handle subsequent wide-scale CRL downloads and continues to work with those that may have experienced response delays as a result of the increased demand. We also continue to work with industry leaders, partners, and the technical community to encourage promulgation the use of alternative validity determination mechanisms, such as the online certificate status protocol, which may be less susceptible to these kinds of periodic events."

Talkback

i think it has help as i having problem with internet explorer over thr past few weeks

via Facebook 12 January, 2004 03:27
Reply

While I understand that Symantec and Verisign are looking into the solution and have offered a new certificate, which I have downloaded and installed, it does not solve the problem. I had to uncheck the "check the certificate" box to get my computer back to speed.

I think it is unbelievable that Symantec who is supposed to provide protection has downloaded the problem onto my PC.

Any attempts to contact them are in vain. They cause a problem and then want to charge you to call them for the solution.

I think I will try McAfee as well.

via Facebook 12 January, 2004 16:31
Reply

You will see more of these events affecting all software using security.

The failure of one affects the whole chain.

You want more secure software, that takes more than one company, unless you want a megamonopoly. And even though one company is affected by errors of another, it doesn't make the first company responsible or liable for the faults of another.

Ok, so you want to change software. Alright, which is better? The one with the interface you can't use? How about the one with no security? Perhaps the one that can't find half the viruses?

Sorry about ranting, but this isn't an issue of Norton (or whomever) Sucks. It's an issue of the interelated web of software 'security and trust' failing, and the end users whining at their lightly scalded hand rather that the fire that did it.

via Facebook 12 January, 2004 19:49
Reply

The problem is that Norton Anti-Virus is automatically dialing up to crl.verisign.com when it didn't before (even when this is unticked in the options). It is clearlry Nortons problem and they should resolve it immediately.

via Facebook 13 January, 2004 07:58
Reply

Now that's interesting. Since that AV download which also included a program update my PC has been trying to dial out when first booted up *and* when closing down. I checked to see what was behind it and it was SYMPROXY and NAV32, both to do with Norton AV. I couldn't get any feedback to or from Norton due to running Norton SW 2002. I've now had to select to not allow any applications to dial automatically.

via Facebook 13 January, 2004 11:48
Reply

Well, I didn't notice any slow-down in my system, but regardless, I think I'll be staying with Norton - I have to look at their track record on my system over the past 4 years and I've been very impressed with their frequent updates and quick responses to security threats. It's worth sticking with it - would you ditch windows because it crashes on you? You can't ditch what is a very user friendly and well built av program due to one problem - just my opinion.

via Facebook 13 January, 2004 19:15
Reply

Both Symantec and McAfee products are extremely poorly developed, and especially as related to their "live updating" features. Not only do their products miss substantial numbers of events and viruses etc, the live update features continually bog down the processors killing services at the host, which requires numerous unecessary reboots. That and the fact that the products do the same downloads between 10 and 50 times per day(tracked and verified), of the same exact updates is completely ridiculous.

Another apparent design flaw is the ability to turn off the live update feature, in Norton products specifically, to set to manual "notify me when updates are available" does not work, except that the cute little update icon goes away, but the product continues to update, causing the above problems with host processors

I, for one, will not renew my subscriptions when time, nor will Symantec products ever run on my corporate servers in the future.

via Facebook 14 January, 2004 14:07
Reply

I recently downloaded NAV2004 and I regret it. It slowed my computer down dramatically and I keep getting error messages when using the internet. I want to get in touch with Symantec but their website is user unfriendly. The email service I used only one month ago just returns my emails so I have to plough through their standard pages of advice- a very poor service. HOW CAN I GET IN TOUCH WITH THEM? Also I have been advised that NAV is incompatible with AOLis there any truth in that? Brian Fall

via Facebook 20 February, 2004 17:25
Reply

I recently downloaded NAV2004 and it has left me with no e-mail protection and trashed Word- after 12 spam and virus free months witrh NAV2003 my computer is now riddled with problems and the so called customer support, from 9.30 to 4.30 weekdays only, is pathetic for any-one not working from home. Three weeks later problems still not solved despite umpteen attempts.

via Facebook 6 March, 2004 08:48
Reply

I e-mail the following to symantec and have still had no response from them:

' I purchased Norton systemworks 2005 just before the new year, I already had Norton internet security 2004 installed,
the program installed fine but when I ran the full system scan it completed the scan then came up with the error 3019,6,
I went to the website and followed the instructions online but the problem remained. I contacted telephone support and was given
various instructions but to no avail, I was sent a link and told to follow the instructions, I did so to no avail, I contacted support
again and was given various instructions including going into the registry and removing various folders, systemworks failed to install,
I was yet again instructed to go to a link on the symantec website and follow the instructions, I have done this, the result being that now I am left hanging with both Norton systemworks 2005 and Norton internet security 2004 uninstalled from my system and I cannot reinstall either.

I can only get through to customer services during working hours which means I have to take time off work to deal with this situation and I have lost faith that they can actually help me. I have spent a lot of money and time both on the products and on the phone to customer sevices , I am now worse off than when I started.

My call reference number was: 002856517

Is there anyone at symantec who can help or is this just another faceless company who don't really care for their customers? '.

It's a shame that symantec support is not as good as its products, up to now I have always found norton very good.

I am an IT consultant and usually recommend software products to my clients, If this is the level of support symantec provides then I'm afraid they will have to be ticked off of my list.

via Facebook 18 January, 2005 11:03
Reply

I have the same problem with Norton Internet Security 2006. After renewing subscription an downloading the program I have had to download another 6 times, still not installed. Used their on line fix it tool which removed all and now cannot reinstall,have sent e-mails to their "Tech-Support" which I consider a big joke, using every step given (which had already been done at least 2 times) still not able to install. I have been attempting this installation for over 5 1/2 months. GoodBye to Norton and their crap.

via Facebook 2 August, 2006 16:51
Reply

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

kevinmchapman

"the very significant number of users" and "many (most) of us" - you have no evidence for these statements. It is a fact that most users are saying...

4 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Marg Menzies Harrison

Another grammar faux pas is the improper use of "you". When sitting down down in a restaurant, for example, I get cringe when the waitress...

5 hours ago by Marg Menzies Harrison via Facebook on 10 flagrant grammar mistakes that make you look stupid
zdnetukuser

And NOW, folks, for Canonical's next trick... Kubuntu is late. Here's a pencil. Draw your own conclusions. cf.:...

6 hours ago by zdnetukuser on Linux Minterface
Moley

@kevinmchapman. The discussion here reflects the very significant number of users who really do like the traditional menu system and who wish to...

8 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

Er, no... It is an efficient means of finding the application/file/setting you need in one place. The icons are a simply a fallback for when you...

9 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

Isn't the provision of a text based search an admission by the developers that the mass of icons approach does not work? I don't need to use a...

11 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

"Unity and GNOME 3 both abandon the old text-based cascading menus in favour of a graphical icon-driven system." Point truly missed. Both use a...

11 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

whs001 - Thank you, I'm glad you liked the article. I absolutely agree with you on your first point. I should perhaps have made it clearer that...

11 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Dennis Nilsson

If we allow corporate interest to dictate the way our government circumvents due process against foreign entities then we should accept the same...

12 hours ago by Dennis Nilsson via Facebook on ACTA stumbles in Germany
GHar123

I totally dislike pirating of works, I fear that artists will be deterred from creating works if they think that they are going to get ripped off....

14 hours ago by GHar123 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
JCB33

How dare film makers, artists or anybody that invests in creativity stop us pirating their works for free. I want to be able to walk into my local...

20 hours ago by JCB33 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
Moley

@GrueMaster. I prefer horses for courses rather than one size fits all. I, and I suspect most other computer users, do not really wish to have...

22 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
greycynic

The product that scares me every time I have to use it is the Office 2007 version of Excel. The first bug that I found was applying the median...

22 hours ago by greycynic on Ten flawed products that derail productivity
GrueMaster

Nice review and very informative. One thing I'd like to add (in reply to whs001's 1st question), the main reason to have the same interface from...

23 hours ago by GrueMaster on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Frederick Wrigley

I'be been using Mint 12 since the RC came out, and I am far more happy with the Cinnamon, the Mate, and, yes (with extensions), theGnome 3...

1 day ago by Frederick Wrigley via Facebook on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
bdantas

Excellent article. One small correction, though--although a fresh installation of Linux Mint 12 will, indeed, provide the user with a version of...

1 day ago by bdantas on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

1 day ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

1 day ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Moley

For Gnome 2 die-hards, it is possible to add icons to the bottom panel (or top top panel, if you prefer) which provide the exact Gnome 2...

1 day ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
ramwellian

Your comments would seem pretty naive and immature. Your 'solution' appears to be, "gee, let's all just give in to the hackers and give them...

1 day ago by ramwellian on Cloud computing security: no more oxymoron?