Pick the proper hardware for your Exchange 2000 server

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

Hard disk One of the trickiest things to plan within an Exchange environment is the hard disk. The hard disk configuration is absolutely essential to the way Exchange performs. If you're on a tight budget and you only have a handful of users, there's absolutely no reason you can't use a server that contains a single partition on an IDE hard drive. Generally, though, this is a configuration you'll want to avoid. The real trick to planning a hard disk configuration is to think about what the Exchange server will use the hard disk for. First, you have the Exchange database files that are used for the users' mailboxes and for the public folders. Next, you have the Exchange log files that are used as a temporary storage location for database transactions. These log files are also used in disaster recovery situations. Finally, you also have to think about the Windows 2000 page file. For an optimal configuration, I recommend keeping all three of these file types separate. For example, you should place the page file on one physical hard disk, the Exchange log files on another, and the Exchange databases on a third physical hard disk. Notice that I said physical hard disk instead of partition. As long as you're using SCSI, Windows can access each hard disk simultaneously, which means that the server can make a database entry, update a log file, and update the page file at the same time. If all of these items existed on the same physical hard disk, the operating system would have to complete one disk operation before it could start the next one. I realise that on lower-end servers, three SCSI hard drives may be beyond your budget. As I mentioned, the primary reason for keeping the files separate is performance. Exchange does use the log files for disaster recovery, though, and even if you only have a single hard disk, it's a good idea to keep the log files on a different partition from the database files. The idea is that if the partition containing the Exchange databases were to fail, you would still be able to access the log files and bring the server back up. Of course, that trick will only work if the failure is at the partition level. If the entire drive were to fail, you'd lose the databases and the log files, even if they were in separate partitions. That gives you an idea of what to do if you're using a low-end server, but what if you want to use a high-end server? In such a situation, I recommend using a separate physical hard drive for the page file, a RAID array for the log files, and another RAID array for the Exchange databases. Doing so will provide the fastest possible access to the log files and databases. If you've chosen to use a fault tolerant RAID array, you've also protected your data while boosting performance. Network connection You really can't do a lot with the network connection beyond the obvious. However, if you have multiple Exchange servers in close proximity, you can install a second network card in each server and create a dedicated backbone between the Exchange servers. By doing so, you can take the Exchange-related replication traffic off of the main network and confine it to a dedicated network. This will ease the traffic on your network, and the replication process will also be faster because replication traffic won't be delayed by user traffic. Conclusion Although it's a resource hog, Exchange 2000 can be implemented to suit your needs. Whether you're using low-end or high-end servers, you can create an Exchange server that will service your company's requirements. Just remember that faster memory is better than faster processors, SCSI is better than IDE, separating file types on different drives is better than all-in-one, and fault tolerant RAID is your friend. Editorial disclaimer: The authors and editors have taken care in preparation of the content contained herein but make no expressed or implied warranty of any kind and assume no responsibility for errors or omissions. No liability is assumed for any damages. Always have a verified backup before making any changes.
Have your say instantly in the Tech Update forum. Let the editors know what you think in the Mailroom.

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

apexwm

I don't understand why there cannot be a slight pause during the boot process so the user can press a key. Many operating systems do this, even if...

36 minutes ago by apexwm on Windows 8 start-up speed forces USB boot workaround
Gavin Goodman

You can now buy the Xi3 modular computer in the UK at http://www.ocdistribution.com . This can be bought with the Tand3m software, pricing and...

1 hour ago by Gavin Goodman on CES 2012: Xi3 microSERV3R
Phil at Cloud4

I agree: Mike Lynch can clearly build a business and manage strategy. I suspect the exit of Mike is more likely the end of a planned handover...

4 hours ago by Phil at Cloud4 on HP cuts 27,000 staff as Autonomy chief Lynch leaves
Phil at Cloud4

This is unbeleivable government wastage with only one winner... Microsoft 1 - Tax payer Nil!

5 hours ago by Phil at Cloud4 on 6 million wasted licences and £1,200 PCs: welcome to government IT
Mispam

So what do you do when you can't boot into windows? Why can't I just hold Shift while I power up instead of having to boot into windows and click a...

5 hours ago by Mispam on Windows 8 start-up speed forces USB boot workaround
apexwm

I've also seen that Mac OS X for Intel machines is supposed to run in VirtualBox, which would also be a nice solution. I've never tried it though.

7 hours ago by apexwm on xTreme Triple Booting: Linux, Mac & Windows
dave heasman

What I wonder is why when companies are caught bang to rights in not providing contracted services, people bend over to smear the customers? Surely...

8 hours ago by dave heasman on Virgin throttles broadband for high-speed customers
pjc158

Strange statement from HP regarding Mike Lynch and not capable of scaling a company. Autonomy was a $7bn purchase which started as a small company...

8 hours ago by pjc158 on HP cuts 27,000 staff as Autonomy chief Lynch leaves
lojolondon

Or - possibly, they will destroy business by ensuring people do not invest where there is no return. Another socialist idea, well beyond it's...

11 hours ago by lojolondon on Open Data Institute will act as biz incubator
J.A. Watson

Good stuff Jake, very interesting. Thanks. jw

12 hours ago by J.A. Watson on xTreme Triple Booting: Linux, Mac & Windows
openhgs

"the cost of a second LCD screen is about the same as one day of an office worker's time, so this should soon be recouped in extra productivity."...

13 hours ago by openhgs on Windows 8 could speed multi-monitor uptake
Thomas Gellhaus

I also installed the KDE version; I also will probably try out razorqt since I really haven't had a chance to before. I'm looking forward to the...

23 hours ago by Thomas Gellhaus via Facebook on Mageia 2 Released
francisabigail

Acquiring when reinvention/cannibalization is too challenging for a large organization can be an excellent strategy- still, so many mergers stumble...

1 day ago by francisabigail on Ariba buy parks SAP on Oracle's cloud turf
apexwm

All of the feedback regarding using a touch monitor for a desktop PC is right on. Several months ago, we installed a "demo" multitouch all-in-one...

1 day ago by apexwm on Windows 8 could speed multi-monitor uptake
191706

anyone wanting to triple boot *their* own Mac

1 day ago by 191706 on xTreme Triple Booting: Linux, Mac & Windows
SoapyTablet

Cont.. Biggest Bugbear: Win7's stop-animate-go approach to work, you develop a staggered (not in the above alchohol sense of the word) approach to...

1 day ago by SoapyTablet on Windows 8 could speed multi-monitor uptake
SoapyTablet

Ah the joys of Windows 8 Consumer Preview... If Windows 7 was 'Vista with Lipstick', whats Windows 8? Vista with Lipstick, the morning after?...

1 day ago by SoapyTablet on Windows 8 could speed multi-monitor uptake
daveveej

Though the metro look is quite cool on the windows mobile platform I think that think that microsoft ARE MESSING THINGS UP because what has they...

1 day ago by daveveej on Windows 8 could speed multi-monitor uptake
Custonian

I agree, we have a few touch screen monitors in work but as Windows7 and the applications we use are not touch screen friendly (the size of the...

1 day ago by Custonian on Windows 8 could speed multi-monitor uptake
archerthom

I find it amusing that Microsoft added the mouse, which was deemed awkward, but people were forced to use it so it stuck, and now they're saying,...

1 day ago by archerthom on Windows 8 could speed multi-monitor uptake