Legacy apps at home with XP

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

ANALYSIS
For more than a decade, the programmers behind Microsoft Windows have been caught in a double bind. On one hand, Windows needs to be the latest and greatest OS; on the other hand, it needs to maintain a certain amount of backward compatibility. The problem has been handled in different ways over the years. While it's true that there's no DOS kernel behind Windows XP, and therefore no guarantee of compatibility with 16-bit programs, XP's support of legacy applications through a new Compatibility Mode is more effective than any of the attempts in previous Windows versions. I'll explain how this feature can make nearly any legacy application work with Windows XP. First of two parts This is the first section of a two-part article on the use of legacy applications in Windows XP. Next week's installment will discuss setting up a Compatibility Mode and running MS-DOS in XP. What constitutes a legacy application?
A legacy application is one that's designed to run under an older version of the OS. Legacy applications can include 32-bit programs designed for Windows 9x, Windows NT, or Windows 2000; they can also include 16-bit Windows applications designed for Windows 3.x and MS-DOS applications. Basically, legacy is a big basket into which everything is thrown that wasn't specifically designed for Windows XP. Most legacy applications work fine in Windows XP with the default settings, and you don't have to do anything special to make them work. However, you may run into the occasional maverick program that breaks the rules, usually because of some programming quirk created by a shortsighted programmer who never dreamed that his program would live longer than the version of Windows for which he wrote it. Some applications check the OS version at startup, for example, and won't run unless they find a version they recognise. Others rely on certain system files included with a particular OS or a particular method of accessing the video subsystem or some other hardware. To be fair, the refusal of a legacy application to run under Windows XP isn't always due to shortsighted programming. There might have been a very good reason at the time to limit a certain application to a fixed set of OSs. Programmers couldn't have guessed in the mid-1990s that Windows XP was on its way and that it would make irrelevant what was then a compelling application. There are also programs of a certain type that have legitimate reasons for not running under Windows XP, such as older disk utilities. See the advice below. Don't even try it... Before we get into making legacy applications work under Windows XP, let's reflect for a moment upon the old adage that just because you can do something doesn't mean you should. Any older applications that modify the disk structure, such as old versions of Norton Utilities, old versions of Partition Magic, antivirus utilities, and so on, should never be run on Windows XP. Make sure you get a version that specifically supports Windows XP-when you're working with programs that alter the disk structure or content, you don't want to fool around. Even if such a program seems to run okay on Windows XP, I wouldn't trust it with my data. Ditto for command-line utilities from MS-DOS, such as DriveSpace (or its earlier incarnation, DoubleSpace), and third-party compression utilities, such as Stacker. (Anybody remember Stacker? Come on, it's not that old.)If you've decided to ignore the warning in the preceding paragraph, at least heed this one: Do not try to coax such an older disk utility into running under Windows XP by using Compatibility Mode or any special settings. If the program doesn't want to run under XP, it's probably for a very good reason How Compatibility Mode works Compatibility issues are nothing new. Many of you probably remember the days of MS-DOS's SETVER utility, which enabled MS-DOS to trick older applications into believing that an earlier version of MS-DOS was running. And you may recall in Windows 9x a setting for MS-DOS programs that enabled Windows to convince an application that Windows wasn't running when, in fact, it was. It's in the same vein that the new Compatibility Mode feature in Windows XP operates but much more smoothly and with better options. Compatibility Mode in Windows XP doesn't actually run the older OS that you specify; it just tricks the program into believing that the specified OS is running by changing certain cues that the program receives. Compatibility Mode can emulate Windows 95, Windows 98, Windows NT 4, and Windows 2000. It doesn't emulate MS-DOS. (I'll talk about MS-DOS programs later.) In addition to the behind-the-scenes compatibility it sets up, Compatibility Mode can enable a program to use a 256-color depth and a 640 x 480 screen resolution. These video modes have been retired from regular Windows XP operation; you won't find them available in Display Properties anymore. So if you need to run a program that requires that particular color depth or resolution, Compatibility Mode is the way to get access to those. You can set up Compatibility Mode in Windows XP in two ways. The wizard method takes a rather long time, but it provides some help for figuring out the right settings to use. The other method is quick and dirty, but you run the risk of getting the settings wrong.

Talkback

I have a computer i got yesterday and it didn't come with a windows xp home cd(s) and when i turned it on i got, (The system is not fully installed: Please run setup again. I havee the 6 startup disketts but it just does the same thing and i need to install win98se on here, How can i get it to to a, a> to format the hard drive to install 98?, PLEASE SEND EMAIL IN CARE OF JAMES XP HELP

via Facebook 11 December, 2003 23:11
Reply

I HAVE XP AND NEED TO KNOW IF I CAN INSTALL MS-DOS TO RUN SOME OLD PROGRAMS FROM 1994?

via Facebook 17 September, 2004 16:34
Reply

You can not install Ms-dos on Xp because there are 2 diffrent operating systems. Though there is several things you can do to get your old applications working if they dont work in compatibilty mode. 1 is to partition a part of the hard drive with Msdos on the actual partion. It is possible. 2 you can also download boot images off the net of Ms dos and then run msdos from the A: Drive. The third one is to download a program called DOSBOX free to use and its a great emulator for Ms dos programs. It not fully functioning because it is just a emulator but its the first one to try if your to lazy to try the first 2. 2 days of research taught me such things ;)

via Facebook 17 November, 2004 15:38
Reply

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

BrownieBoy

> I'm told it's somewhat annoying when people have their Macs stolen > and Apple stores treat the thief as the owner, but there you go. Ouch,...

14 minutes ago by BrownieBoy on AMD Ultrathins to challenge Intel Ultrabooks
Moley

@kevinmchapman. OK, I acknowledge that 'most' was a gratuitous throwaway comment as an afterthought and too presumptuous. As to proof, as you...

5 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Jack Schofield

@BrownieBoy > Works really well for thieves.... >> Nice attempt to deflect the argument by tossing in a point that's totally >> irrelevant, even...

6 hours ago by Jack Schofield on AMD Ultrathins to challenge Intel Ultrabooks
raskolnikof

fantastic that the so called piracy bills have been withdrawn. however, these anti-democracy supporters are still in the shadows so lets be alert...

7 hours ago by raskolnikof on SOPA, Protect IP support wavers in face of online protest
Tony Douglas

Please God no; teach them anything you like - thinking rationally, the uses and misuses of data, what data is and what it's not - but leave the...

9 hours ago by Tony Douglas via Facebook on Kids are the future. Teach ’em to code.
BrownieBoy

@Jack, > Works really well for thieves.... Nice attempt to deflect the argument by tossing in a point that's totally irrelevant, even it were...

23 hours ago by BrownieBoy on AMD Ultrathins to challenge Intel Ultrabooks
bootlegger

Make that 13 people now - I got refused today at Manchester airport. I thought I was up to date on this legislation - I knew of the EU ruling from...

1 day ago by bootlegger on UK airport body scans will not be opt out
tinycg

Don't forget to check out apps like GoodReader or SlideShark either, they're indispensible for people on the go in presentation situations. Best...

1 day ago by tinycg on Four top iPad apps for people on the move
TerryRK

Well it seems there is something a number of us agree on. Why is the Ubuntu Unity launcher so ugly? I thought perhaps it was something to do with...

1 day ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Freebies202

Duplicate comments are not made intentionally. Its very good to know that now you are keeping check on this problem because sometimes a commenter...

2 days ago by Freebies202 on Microsoft fixes blog comments, speeds up blogs with open source
kevinmchapman

"the very significant number of users" and "many (most) of us" - you have no evidence for these statements. It is a fact that most users are saying...

2 days ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Marg Menzies Harrison

Another grammar faux pas is the improper use of "you". When sitting down down in a restaurant, for example, I get cringe when the waitress...

2 days ago by Marg Menzies Harrison via Facebook on 10 flagrant grammar mistakes that make you look stupid
zdnetukuser

And NOW, folks, for Canonical's next trick... Kubuntu is late. Here's a pencil. Draw your own conclusions. cf.:...

2 days ago by zdnetukuser on Linux Minterface
Moley

@kevinmchapman. The discussion here reflects the very significant number of users who really do like the traditional menu system and who wish to...

2 days ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

Er, no... It is an efficient means of finding the application/file/setting you need in one place. The icons are a simply a fallback for when you...

2 days ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

Isn't the provision of a text based search an admission by the developers that the mass of icons approach does not work? I don't need to use a...

2 days ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

"Unity and GNOME 3 both abandon the old text-based cascading menus in favour of a graphical icon-driven system." Point truly missed. Both use a...

2 days ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

whs001 - Thank you, I'm glad you liked the article. I absolutely agree with you on your first point. I should perhaps have made it clearer that...

2 days ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Dennis Nilsson

If we allow corporate interest to dictate the way our government circumvents due process against foreign entities then we should accept the same...

2 days ago by Dennis Nilsson via Facebook on ACTA stumbles in Germany
GHar123

I totally dislike pirating of works, I fear that artists will be deterred from creating works if they think that they are going to get ripped off....

3 days ago by GHar123 on ACTA stumbles in Germany