Outlook 2003 offers many new features, but it will cost you

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

Exchange 2003: The server for Outlook 2003
Outlook 2003 is a great email client for a wide variety of servers. Whether you're using Exchange, POP3, IMAP, or HTTP to get to your email server, you can use Outlook 2003 as a client to good advantage. That said, some of the new Outlook 2003 features will work only if you're using Exchange 2003 (not an earlier version) as your email server. That's because the Outlook and Exchange teams have worked together to optimise the protocols that the two use to communicate. Some particular features that require Exchange 2003 on the server include:

  • Compressed and optimised protocols for faster email downloading.
  • Logging on over the Internet.
  • Improved synchronisation capabilities.
  • Support for local caching of server mailboxes.
  • Support for transparent online/offline transitions.
  • Client performance monitoring (from the perspective of the server).


Of course, there are many other features in Exchange 2003 beyond the Outlook-specific advances. With Microsoft including Exchange as a member of the "Office 2003 System," it's worth a quick look at some of these features. So here's a quick Exchange 2003 list:

  • The new Outlook Web Access interface
  • Support for WAP and iMode communications with mobile devices
  • Eight-way clustering for better scalability and uptime
  • Built-in antispam hooks for third-party vendors
  • Improvements to the virus-scanning API
  • Kerberos security
  • An API that allows snapshot backup without taking down the server
  • Dynamic distribution lists
  • Exchange Server Objects (XSO), which is a new .NET-style programming interface


So, if you can afford it, you'll want to upgrade your email servers to Exchange 2003 to best support Outlook 2003 clients. But that's it, right?

Windows 2003 too!
Well...not quite. You can install Exchange 2003 on a Windows 2000 server (provided that you have SP3 installed on the server, and for security reasons, you should do that anyway). But to enable the complete Exchange 2003 functionality, you need to be running Windows Server 2003. That's because the new Exchange depends on the new Windows for some of its advanced features:

  • Outlook access over the Internet
  • Eight-way clustering
  • Enhanced Active Directory integration
  • Faster backups and restores


There isn't time to go into all the features of Windows 2003, which have been adequately covered elsewhere. But it's fair to say that most people don't think about upgrading their servers to a new operating system when considering whether to switch to a new version of their email client. Of course, upgrading a server to a new version of Windows is not something to be taken lightly. Besides the significant cost of the new version, you need to take into account possible downtime, the potential difficulty of migrating settings, and the need to retrain your server administrators. There are real benefits to the upgrade, but it's not a decision that you should rush into. So what's the bottom line?
Outlook 2003 is undoubtedly the best version of Outlook yet. In most organisations, email is the one application that sits open on everyone's desk, all day, every day. So it makes sense to buy the best email application that you can get; even minor productivity improvements will quickly add up for such a pervasive application. With that in mind, it's easy to recommend upgrading to Outlook 2003. But you need to have a realistic estimate of the impact and costs of the upgrade process itself, particularly if you elect to go the full route and install Exchange 2003 on Windows Server 2003 to handle the email server chores for your organisation. Microsoft, of course, would love for you to upgrade everything; that's one reason it's calling it an Office "System" these days. But your own needs and budget may have other ideas. To make the right decision for your organisation, there's no substitute for getting some "sandbox time" with the product. Set up Outlook 2003 using test accounts on your current email server. Then set up a test server running Exchange 2003 on Windows 2003. Take a look at the differences in functionality, and you'll be on your way to knowing whether the advances are enough to justify the upgrades in your own company.
More enterprise IT news in ZDNet UK's Tech Update Channel.

For a weekly round-up of the enterprise IT news, sign up for the Tech Update newsletter. Let the editors know what you think in the Mailroom.

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

BrownieBoy

> I'm told it's somewhat annoying when people have their Macs stolen > and Apple stores treat the thief as the owner, but there you go. Ouch,...

19 minutes ago by BrownieBoy on AMD Ultrathins to challenge Intel Ultrabooks
Moley

@kevinmchapman. OK, I acknowledge that 'most' was a gratuitous throwaway comment as an afterthought and too presumptuous. As to proof, as you...

5 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Jack Schofield

@BrownieBoy > Works really well for thieves.... >> Nice attempt to deflect the argument by tossing in a point that's totally >> irrelevant, even...

6 hours ago by Jack Schofield on AMD Ultrathins to challenge Intel Ultrabooks
raskolnikof

fantastic that the so called piracy bills have been withdrawn. however, these anti-democracy supporters are still in the shadows so lets be alert...

7 hours ago by raskolnikof on SOPA, Protect IP support wavers in face of online protest
Tony Douglas

Please God no; teach them anything you like - thinking rationally, the uses and misuses of data, what data is and what it's not - but leave the...

9 hours ago by Tony Douglas via Facebook on Kids are the future. Teach ’em to code.
BrownieBoy

@Jack, > Works really well for thieves.... Nice attempt to deflect the argument by tossing in a point that's totally irrelevant, even it were...

23 hours ago by BrownieBoy on AMD Ultrathins to challenge Intel Ultrabooks
bootlegger

Make that 13 people now - I got refused today at Manchester airport. I thought I was up to date on this legislation - I knew of the EU ruling from...

1 day ago by bootlegger on UK airport body scans will not be opt out
tinycg

Don't forget to check out apps like GoodReader or SlideShark either, they're indispensible for people on the go in presentation situations. Best...

1 day ago by tinycg on Four top iPad apps for people on the move
TerryRK

Well it seems there is something a number of us agree on. Why is the Ubuntu Unity launcher so ugly? I thought perhaps it was something to do with...

1 day ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Freebies202

Duplicate comments are not made intentionally. Its very good to know that now you are keeping check on this problem because sometimes a commenter...

2 days ago by Freebies202 on Microsoft fixes blog comments, speeds up blogs with open source
kevinmchapman

"the very significant number of users" and "many (most) of us" - you have no evidence for these statements. It is a fact that most users are saying...

2 days ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Marg Menzies Harrison

Another grammar faux pas is the improper use of "you". When sitting down down in a restaurant, for example, I get cringe when the waitress...

2 days ago by Marg Menzies Harrison via Facebook on 10 flagrant grammar mistakes that make you look stupid
zdnetukuser

And NOW, folks, for Canonical's next trick... Kubuntu is late. Here's a pencil. Draw your own conclusions. cf.:...

2 days ago by zdnetukuser on Linux Minterface
Moley

@kevinmchapman. The discussion here reflects the very significant number of users who really do like the traditional menu system and who wish to...

2 days ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

Er, no... It is an efficient means of finding the application/file/setting you need in one place. The icons are a simply a fallback for when you...

2 days ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

Isn't the provision of a text based search an admission by the developers that the mass of icons approach does not work? I don't need to use a...

2 days ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

"Unity and GNOME 3 both abandon the old text-based cascading menus in favour of a graphical icon-driven system." Point truly missed. Both use a...

2 days ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

whs001 - Thank you, I'm glad you liked the article. I absolutely agree with you on your first point. I should perhaps have made it clearer that...

2 days ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Dennis Nilsson

If we allow corporate interest to dictate the way our government circumvents due process against foreign entities then we should accept the same...

2 days ago by Dennis Nilsson via Facebook on ACTA stumbles in Germany
GHar123

I totally dislike pirating of works, I fear that artists will be deterred from creating works if they think that they are going to get ripped off....

3 days ago by GHar123 on ACTA stumbles in Germany