Outlook 2003 offers many new features, but it will cost you

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

Exchange 2003: The server for Outlook 2003
Outlook 2003 is a great email client for a wide variety of servers. Whether you're using Exchange, POP3, IMAP, or HTTP to get to your email server, you can use Outlook 2003 as a client to good advantage. That said, some of the new Outlook 2003 features will work only if you're using Exchange 2003 (not an earlier version) as your email server. That's because the Outlook and Exchange teams have worked together to optimise the protocols that the two use to communicate. Some particular features that require Exchange 2003 on the server include:

  • Compressed and optimised protocols for faster email downloading.
  • Logging on over the Internet.
  • Improved synchronisation capabilities.
  • Support for local caching of server mailboxes.
  • Support for transparent online/offline transitions.
  • Client performance monitoring (from the perspective of the server).


Of course, there are many other features in Exchange 2003 beyond the Outlook-specific advances. With Microsoft including Exchange as a member of the "Office 2003 System," it's worth a quick look at some of these features. So here's a quick Exchange 2003 list:

  • The new Outlook Web Access interface
  • Support for WAP and iMode communications with mobile devices
  • Eight-way clustering for better scalability and uptime
  • Built-in antispam hooks for third-party vendors
  • Improvements to the virus-scanning API
  • Kerberos security
  • An API that allows snapshot backup without taking down the server
  • Dynamic distribution lists
  • Exchange Server Objects (XSO), which is a new .NET-style programming interface


So, if you can afford it, you'll want to upgrade your email servers to Exchange 2003 to best support Outlook 2003 clients. But that's it, right?

Windows 2003 too!
Well...not quite. You can install Exchange 2003 on a Windows 2000 server (provided that you have SP3 installed on the server, and for security reasons, you should do that anyway). But to enable the complete Exchange 2003 functionality, you need to be running Windows Server 2003. That's because the new Exchange depends on the new Windows for some of its advanced features:

  • Outlook access over the Internet
  • Eight-way clustering
  • Enhanced Active Directory integration
  • Faster backups and restores


There isn't time to go into all the features of Windows 2003, which have been adequately covered elsewhere. But it's fair to say that most people don't think about upgrading their servers to a new operating system when considering whether to switch to a new version of their email client. Of course, upgrading a server to a new version of Windows is not something to be taken lightly. Besides the significant cost of the new version, you need to take into account possible downtime, the potential difficulty of migrating settings, and the need to retrain your server administrators. There are real benefits to the upgrade, but it's not a decision that you should rush into. So what's the bottom line?
Outlook 2003 is undoubtedly the best version of Outlook yet. In most organisations, email is the one application that sits open on everyone's desk, all day, every day. So it makes sense to buy the best email application that you can get; even minor productivity improvements will quickly add up for such a pervasive application. With that in mind, it's easy to recommend upgrading to Outlook 2003. But you need to have a realistic estimate of the impact and costs of the upgrade process itself, particularly if you elect to go the full route and install Exchange 2003 on Windows Server 2003 to handle the email server chores for your organisation. Microsoft, of course, would love for you to upgrade everything; that's one reason it's calling it an Office "System" these days. But your own needs and budget may have other ideas. To make the right decision for your organisation, there's no substitute for getting some "sandbox time" with the product. Set up Outlook 2003 using test accounts on your current email server. Then set up a test server running Exchange 2003 on Windows 2003. Take a look at the differences in functionality, and you'll be on your way to knowing whether the advances are enough to justify the upgrades in your own company.
More enterprise IT news in ZDNet UK's Tech Update Channel.

For a weekly round-up of the enterprise IT news, sign up for the Tech Update newsletter. Let the editors know what you think in the Mailroom.

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

songmaster

SHleG: Do you remember building a clockwork scorpion kit (I'm pretty sure I have a photo of it somewhere) — I think it was called something like...

4 minutes ago by songmaster on Software with everything
Chris Wortman

Good I love Yahoo! Their search engine is getting better than Google as of late. I find more of what I want on the first page, and usually within...

35 minutes ago by Chris Wortman via Facebook on Linux Mint 13 ramps up for KDE release
PatrickG

openhgs has made the point for Windows 8 multiple monitors without realising it! With Windows 7 you have to switch the mouse and so your focus...

2 hours ago by PatrickG on Windows 8 could speed multi-monitor uptake
Leslie Satenstein

Mozilla has threatened to stop supporting Linux. I guess that UBUNTU is going with another browser. I indicated that if Mozilla stops supporting...

4 hours ago by Leslie Satenstein via Facebook on Firefox rapid release improves Fedora Linux
Andy Bolstridge

Much as I abhor Microsoft's licensing practices, this is almost certainly down to purchasing IT equipment via 3rd party consultants - you get the...

4 hours ago by Andy Bolstridge via Facebook on 6 million wasted licences and £1,200 PCs: welcome to government IT
Jack Schofield

@openhgs Windows users have had multiple desktops since Linus started writing Linux. They just haven't shipped as standard because not enough...

20 hours ago by Jack Schofield on Windows 8 could speed multi-monitor uptake
Jack Schofield

@Phil at Cloud4 What, Microsoft gets £1,200 per PC and £1,622 per server? Gosh, I'm amazed....

21 hours ago by Jack Schofield on 6 million wasted licences and £1,200 PCs: welcome to government IT
craigsc

You guys have no idea what is going on at Autonomy. Autonomy could have been a much more profitable organization. The sales operations at Autonomy...

22 hours ago by craigsc on HP cuts 27,000 staff as Autonomy chief Lynch leaves
Moley

How does this impact on dual or multi booting? Seems to me to more or less prohibit this, from Windows 8 anyway. Will Grub 2 recognise Windows 8,...

22 hours ago by Moley on Windows 8 start-up speed forces USB boot workaround
apexwm

I don't understand why there cannot be a slight pause during the boot process so the user can press a key. Many operating systems do this, even if...

23 hours ago by apexwm on Windows 8 start-up speed forces USB boot workaround
Gavin Goodman

You can now buy the Xi3 modular computer in the UK at http://www.ocdistribution.com . This can be bought with the Tand3m software, pricing and...

1 day ago by Gavin Goodman on CES 2012: Xi3 microSERV3R
Phil at Cloud4

I agree: Mike Lynch can clearly build a business and manage strategy. I suspect the exit of Mike is more likely the end of a planned handover...

1 day ago by Phil at Cloud4 on HP cuts 27,000 staff as Autonomy chief Lynch leaves
Phil at Cloud4

This is unbeleivable government wastage with only one winner... Microsoft 1 - Tax payer Nil!

1 day ago by Phil at Cloud4 on 6 million wasted licences and £1,200 PCs: welcome to government IT
Mispam

So what do you do when you can't boot into windows? Why can't I just hold Shift while I power up instead of having to boot into windows and click a...

1 day ago by Mispam on Windows 8 start-up speed forces USB boot workaround
apexwm

I've also seen that Mac OS X for Intel machines is supposed to run in VirtualBox, which would also be a nice solution. I've never tried it though.

1 day ago by apexwm on xTreme Triple Booting: Linux, Mac & Windows
dave heasman

What I wonder is why when companies are caught bang to rights in not providing contracted services, people bend over to smear the customers? Surely...

1 day ago by dave heasman on Virgin throttles broadband for high-speed customers
pjc158

Strange statement from HP regarding Mike Lynch and not capable of scaling a company. Autonomy was a $7bn purchase which started as a small company...

1 day ago by pjc158 on HP cuts 27,000 staff as Autonomy chief Lynch leaves
lojolondon

Or - possibly, they will destroy business by ensuring people do not invest where there is no return. Another socialist idea, well beyond it's...

1 day ago by lojolondon on Open Data Institute will act as biz incubator
J.A. Watson

Good stuff Jake, very interesting. Thanks. jw

1 day ago by J.A. Watson on xTreme Triple Booting: Linux, Mac & Windows
openhgs

"the cost of a second LCD screen is about the same as one day of an office worker's time, so this should soon be recouped in extra productivity."...

1 day ago by openhgs on Windows 8 could speed multi-monitor uptake