Windows admin 'feature' poses latest hazard

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

NEWS
Security experts are warning users to switch off a Windows messaging feature that has been taken over by spammers and could now pose the latest security threat for Windows users.

The feature, known as the messenger service, was originally designed to let a network administrator send warnings to users when, for example, a server is scheduled to go down for maintenance. Last year, bulk advertisers began using the tool to send pop-up advertising messages directly to a user's computer, and researchers say it would be simple for a virus writer to exploit the feature as well. The feature is not related to Microsoft's instant messaging software.

The warnings take on added urgency with the outbreak of several worms over the past few days that are affecting PCs and corporate networks. The MSBlast worm, the "good" Welchia/Nachi worm, a new version of the Sobig virus and the threat of a Direct X attack are all currently causing concern for Windows users.

Jack Clark, spokesman at security software company McAfee, explained that although the messenger service is not a threat on its own, it could easily be exploited to bring further misery for administrators and users. "Someone could write a virus that infects your machine and instructs it to send out those messages to everyone else," said Clark.

The messaging service, using a component called "Net Send", can be used to send a pop-up alert with 128 characters to either a single user, all users on a domain, or all users that have sessions with a particular server. This could allow spammers to send thousands or even hundreds of thousands of messages from a single command in a DOS shell, although Microsoft's Web site advises people to "use discretion when sending messages to multiple users".

Alex Shipp, a senior antivirus technologist at email security company MessageLabs, agreed the message service is a threat and recommended that administrators make sure it is turned off. "I haven't come across anyone in the past year that has used the messenger service. In general, things you are not using should be turned off -- it is probably best not to leave it up to the poor end user to make those decisions," he said.

In order to switch off the messenger service in Windows XP, Go to the Start button, click on Control Panel, Admin tools and choose Services. Then double click on Messenger and change the Start-Up type to Disabled. Finally, reboot the PC.

Microsoft was not available for comment.

Talkback

I agree - pop up messages like this are becoming a real pain. I use NTL Broadband and if I leave the service on I get approximately 3 per hour. But there is good news... if any of them are adverts for premium rate number in the UK, you can note the message and the number and complain to ICSTIS - they have ruled that it is a viloation of the premium rate operators terms and conditions as well as a contravention of the computer mis-use act.

via Facebook 20 August, 2003 16:39
Reply

Many thanks for your simple solution and instructions how to turn messenger off and stop the enormous amount of messages I receive on my home computer. I searched the Microsoft site by keyword and was not able to find any mention or advice on how to deal with messenger ads. As a home computer user and not an IT professional, I cannot understand why simple instructions as found in your article cannot be made easily available for the home user from Microsoft itself.
Thanks again.

via Facebook 21 August, 2003 01:46
Reply

In case you happen to use the messenger service for what it's supposed to be used for, disabling it naturally is a problem.

But unless the spammer is inside your own network, simply blocking ports 137, 138, and 139 from the outside world is all that needs to be done to prevent those messages from ever entering the network at all.

Some server systems actually do use the service for notifying of printer problems or "server down for service" messages. Especially Windows 2003 servers use it for the latter sample.

via Facebook 21 August, 2003 14:20
Reply

This is a bit of a stretch, as the NET SEND command would have to be locally executed in order to blindly send a pop-up message box to all users in the machine's domain. Otherwise the initiator would need to know specifics such as network usernames and network domains (which is unlikely for an external exploit).

Disabling the Messenger service is an obvious preventative measure, but I am wondering where/how an external party could locally execute the NET SEND command. If the attack is coming from the outside through a TCP/UDP port exploit then NetBIOS/SMB ports like 137, 138, etc. should be blocked on the external interface. If the attack is coming in the form of an e-mail script I suppose the unknowing recipicient party could simply launch the script and perform the command.

Most current Microsoft e-mail application versions now automatically block attachments that are .BAT, .PIF, .CMD, .EXE and those versions that don't can be aided with current antivirus definitions running on the e-mail server and e-mail client. But the scripting capability could be a lot more damaging than sending a NET SEND message box. Imagine one that appended 'format c:' or something to the local startup environment on Windows 9x hosts ?

That being said I still fail to see how a NET SEND message box could contain malicious code. I can appreciate the foresight and proactive nature of this article yet would like some perspective on things.

via Facebook 22 August, 2003 14:32
Reply

The bloated virus magnet with the initials MS strikes again. Is there no end to the new holes that will require new patches? Has Microshaft left all these weak spots so they can browse our system in search of unregistered software? Unix / Linux is looking better every day, and Apple has begun to be an option I'll have to consider.

via Facebook 25 September, 2003 14:33
Reply

While I'm concerned about the security issues, I frequently run Windows and MSN messengers side by side. This allows me to 'appear offline" to a large group of contacts while remaining available to a select few, and still see when contacts come online in the larger group. Personally I'd prefer that Windows messenger was fixed and updated with features equalling MSN not simply discontinued.

via Facebook 26 March, 2004 13:24
Reply

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

kevinmchapman

"the very significant number of users" and "many (most) of us" - you have no evidence for these statements. It is a fact that most users are saying...

7 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Marg Menzies Harrison

Another grammar faux pas is the improper use of "you". When sitting down down in a restaurant, for example, I get cringe when the waitress...

8 hours ago by Marg Menzies Harrison via Facebook on 10 flagrant grammar mistakes that make you look stupid
zdnetukuser

And NOW, folks, for Canonical's next trick... Kubuntu is late. Here's a pencil. Draw your own conclusions. cf.:...

9 hours ago by zdnetukuser on Linux Minterface
Moley

@kevinmchapman. The discussion here reflects the very significant number of users who really do like the traditional menu system and who wish to...

11 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

Er, no... It is an efficient means of finding the application/file/setting you need in one place. The icons are a simply a fallback for when you...

12 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

Isn't the provision of a text based search an admission by the developers that the mass of icons approach does not work? I don't need to use a...

14 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

"Unity and GNOME 3 both abandon the old text-based cascading menus in favour of a graphical icon-driven system." Point truly missed. Both use a...

14 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

whs001 - Thank you, I'm glad you liked the article. I absolutely agree with you on your first point. I should perhaps have made it clearer that...

14 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Dennis Nilsson

If we allow corporate interest to dictate the way our government circumvents due process against foreign entities then we should accept the same...

15 hours ago by Dennis Nilsson via Facebook on ACTA stumbles in Germany
GHar123

I totally dislike pirating of works, I fear that artists will be deterred from creating works if they think that they are going to get ripped off....

17 hours ago by GHar123 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
JCB33

How dare film makers, artists or anybody that invests in creativity stop us pirating their works for free. I want to be able to walk into my local...

23 hours ago by JCB33 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
Moley

@GrueMaster. I prefer horses for courses rather than one size fits all. I, and I suspect most other computer users, do not really wish to have...

1 day ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
greycynic

The product that scares me every time I have to use it is the Office 2007 version of Excel. The first bug that I found was applying the median...

1 day ago by greycynic on Ten flawed products that derail productivity
GrueMaster

Nice review and very informative. One thing I'd like to add (in reply to whs001's 1st question), the main reason to have the same interface from...

1 day ago by GrueMaster on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Frederick Wrigley

I'be been using Mint 12 since the RC came out, and I am far more happy with the Cinnamon, the Mate, and, yes (with extensions), theGnome 3...

1 day ago by Frederick Wrigley via Facebook on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
bdantas

Excellent article. One small correction, though--although a fresh installation of Linux Mint 12 will, indeed, provide the user with a version of...

1 day ago by bdantas on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

1 day ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

1 day ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Moley

For Gnome 2 die-hards, it is possible to add icons to the bottom panel (or top top panel, if you prefer) which provide the exact Gnome 2...

1 day ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
ramwellian

Your comments would seem pretty naive and immature. Your 'solution' appears to be, "gee, let's all just give in to the hackers and give them...

1 day ago by ramwellian on Cloud computing security: no more oxymoron?