Microsoft locks down Office documents

NEWS
As digital media publishers scramble to devise a foolproof method of copy protection, Microsoft is ready to push digital rights management into a whole new arena -- your desktop.

Office 2003, the upcoming update of the company's market-dominating productivity package, for the first time will include tools for restricting access to documents created with the software. Office workers can specify who can read or alter a spreadsheet, block copying or printing, and set an expiration date.

The technology is one of the first major steps in Microsoft's plan to popularise Windows Rights Management Services, a wide-ranging plan to make restricted access to information a standard part of business processes.

Analysts say it represents a badly needed new avenue for boosting sales of Microsoft's server software and an opportunity to lock out competitors, including older versions of Office. It also gives businesses that skipped on the last round or two of Office upgrades a new reason to bite this time.

"If Office 2003 was just another incremental upgrade, they'd have a hard time getting businesses interested," said Michael Gartenberg, an analyst for Jupiter Research. "For most people, the pinnacle of functionality in Office applications came in 1995. But there are more things that can be done using Office as a platform for delivering new services."

The new rights management tools splinter to some extent the long-standing interoperability of Office formats. Until now, PC users have been able to count on opening and manipulating any document saved in Microsoft Word's ".doc" format or Excel's ".xls" in any compatible program, including older versions of Office and competing packages such as Sun Microsystems' StarOffice and the open-source OpenOffice. But rights-protected documents created in Office 2003 can be manipulated only in Office 2003.

"There's certainly a lock-in factor," said Matt Rosoff, an analyst with Directions on Microsoft. "Microsoft would love people to use Office and only Office. They made very sure that Office has these features that nobody else has."

Information Rights Management (IRM) tools will be included in the professional versions of all Office applications, including the Word processor and Excel spreadsheet programs.

To use IRM features, businesses will need a server running Microsoft's Windows Server 2003 operating system and Windows Rights Management Services software. The server software will record permission rules set by the document creator, such as other people authorised to view the document and expiration dates for any permissions. When another person receives that document, they briefly log in to the Windows Rights Management server -- over the Internet or a corporate network -- to validate the permissions.

Dan Leach, Microsoft's lead product manager for Office, said rights management features were built into the new Office based on ongoing discussions with customers.

"We asked people what types of things would you like to do that you can't do now, and what they said is they'd like to spread large amounts of information around to more of their people -- but they have concerns that the wider they spread information, the more likely it is to become available to the wrong people," he said.

Gartenberg said there's a valid need for such services, especially as office workers become more mobile, and more sensitive information is stored on PCs.

"If you're a senior executive and you're carrying around your five-year business plan, you probably want to have that information secured so only you can read it," he said.

Businesses can lock down such documents now with third-party tools such as encryption software, but embedded rights management tools in the document creation software are much easier and more likely to be used, Gartenberg said. "The harder you make security to use for the end user, the less people are going to use it," he said.

Directions on Microsoft's Rosoff said there's a valid business reason for encoding rights management into documents, as shown by Microsoft's travails with leaked software code and documents.

Pushing server sales
As with many Microsoft innovations, the new IRM tools also happen to benefit the software giant's sales in a complimentary market -- server software -- where there's room for growth, as opposed to the fairly saturated market for desktop applications. Both IRM and expanded XML (Extensible Markup Language) functionality -- the two biggest areas of innovation in Office 2003 -- tap into Microsoft's server software. IRM in particular requires Windows Server 2003, which businesses have been slow to adopt since Microsoft finally unveiled it earlier this year.

"When you dominate a market, you change that market," Rosoff said. "Office already has all the document management features people could possibly want. The only way to add value to Office is to make it part of this larger system that adds value."

Microsoft's Leach said Windows Server 2003 simply was the best avenue for delivering rights management functions. "To solve the problem our customers identified... it requires the ability to take advantage of some of the capabilities in Windows Server 2003," he said. "There are many companies that have already invested in Windows Server... and this is certainly going to be a differentiator for them."

Rosoff said Microsoft appears to be less concerned about competitors, however, than getting existing customers to upgrade. "I don't think they're extremely worried about the threat of OpenOffice," he said. "They're worried that documents management is a fairly mature technology that's pretty widely available, so they need to come up with a compelling way to do it."

There's also the potential for confusion in companies that don't upgrade every desktop to Office 2003 at the same time. Workers with Office 2003 will be able to produce documents colleagues with older versions can't use.

"The big question is whether they'll try to bring some backward compatibility," Jupiter's Gartenberg said. "If business users insist on a higher level of interoperability with their existing software, that could be a real challenge. It's very hard to go back and re-architect some of the security features for the older systems."

Leach said Microsoft will provide a free plug-in for its Internet Explorer Web browser that will let it display rights-protected Office documents.

"We recognise that people are going to want to take advantage of this that don't have Office 2003," he said. "This way, they can see the document in a browser window (and) they can print, copy or forward," as decided by the document creator.

Leach added that even for organisations that adopt Office 2003, rights management will still be the exception rather than the rule when creating documents.

"It's not something that you would set up as the default, so that every document I would create is rights management protected," he said. "It's important that you make a choice to apply rights management to a document for very specific reasons."

Rosoff said IRM should see fairly quick adoption -- at least compared with complex XML-based functions to be tied into Office 2003 -- because it solves an immediate business problem and is relatively cheap and easy to implement.

"It's pretty clear with digital rights management what it is and what problems it's trying to solve," he said. "It's not going to be adopted en masse, but I think they'll have a good rollout department by department for people dealing with more sensitive documents."

Talkback

Before Microsoft push new software they should make sure their existing software works. A recent upgrade from Office97 on pcs to Office XP in terminal services was a disaster sincce Offic XP does not work very well with treminal services. We won't be 'upgrading' again in a hurry.

via Facebook 3 September, 2003 10:26
Reply

Likewise before M$ launches or is allowed to launch new products of an commercial nature by that i mean sold as fit for the job they should be forced to provide proof that it is completely safe ie free of holes that can be used by worms viruses trojans ect ect ect ect...

And also they should be forced to comply absolutley and completely with all open standards ie no undocumented formats back doors security locks lets onced and for all either force them to comply or close the hell down .

They must be forced to reliase that what they produce is NOT absolutley essential for the continuation of life on the planet therefore they ARE expendable (and the sooner the better)

via Facebook 3 September, 2003 22:57
Reply

Yet another attempt by Microsoft to create an unfair monopoly. What will we do when Bill Gates decides that he wants to rule the universe? I sincerely hope that the Justice department will wake up and crack down on his unfair and illegal business practices soon.

via Facebook 2 October, 2003 15:06
Reply

This could very well backfire on MS. While this may sound like a good idea for executives when they first hear about it, the idea of forcing people to connect to the corporate infrastructure (especially them) or letting MS handle the rights (in which case you still need some connectivity to verify your rights) might very well cause most companies to scrap the idea.
I was suprised to note this was touted as a user-friendly version of document management as it requires everyone to be using the same software and give the keys to a company that has not had a stellar track record lately. A more useful version of this would be to add plug-ins that allowed for automatic encyption or decryption of documents based on PKI. This way traveling workers could use local key files, it would work across companies and platforms and only need connectivity to a network when you wanted to add access for someone you didn't already have a copy of their public key (which could be sent via e-mail).
The more information that is released about this upgrade, the more it looks as if MS has gone to great lengths to lock companies and users in the upgrade spiral rather than provide the requested features.

via Facebook 2 October, 2003 15:08
Reply

I dont know why your all getting so wound up, just dont buy it, tell your bosses, tell your IT depts, tell your wife and kids, but please dont tell me. I will, as you guys should, make the right purchase for me given my needs and what is available at the right price in the marketplace. I wont slag of Microsoft because they are trying to apply a business fundamental in keeping there customers by continually improving there products and services, i will however continue to read about it all on ZDNet and hopefully continue to get unbiased fact based reporting, no anti MS propoganda.

via Facebook 10 January, 2004 14:45
Reply

What Microshaft is doing now is the same thing that originally caused the M$ Anti-Trust trials. After this(the restricts on documents) comes into effect, you'll see people hacking the documents or avoiding M$ Office completely.

via Facebook 24 December, 2004 20:45
Reply

Business which pays all of the bills do not give a rats ass about some MS Office document compatability. That is left for technical geeks to ponder and to use as some theme to get in the way of business people. The applications that business use MS Office for are core to the business and generate revenue and we have no plans to change at all. So we let the IT guys do some research and tell them to go away when presented with some bullshit OpenOffice solution. This is thier way to show value to the business if they really want to show me value as a CFO get rid of technical zealots and get me some business focused IT people that can work with the business units to create real business value. One day you open source advocates will understand that real business people do not give a dam about open source and the open software cause only about what money we can rape from it. Your agenda is to compete with Microsoft which is a big partner in my business just like IBM, HP, SUN. I understand the focus on Linux is to make the IT folks important as it requires alot of hands to get that stuff working but the reality is I want less hands and more partners that will invest in my business not the it is all open so do what you will with it.

CFO Fortune 100 Firm that just came accross this article

via Facebook 27 December, 2004 13:12
Reply

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

kevinmchapman

"the very significant number of users" and "many (most) of us" - you have no evidence for these statements. It is a fact that most users are saying...

2 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Marg Menzies Harrison

Another grammar faux pas is the improper use of "you". When sitting down down in a restaurant, for example, I get cringe when the waitress...

4 hours ago by Marg Menzies Harrison via Facebook on 10 flagrant grammar mistakes that make you look stupid
zdnetukuser

And NOW, folks, for Canonical's next trick... Kubuntu is late. Here's a pencil. Draw your own conclusions. cf.:...

4 hours ago by zdnetukuser on Linux Minterface
Moley

@kevinmchapman. The discussion here reflects the very significant number of users who really do like the traditional menu system and who wish to...

6 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

Er, no... It is an efficient means of finding the application/file/setting you need in one place. The icons are a simply a fallback for when you...

8 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

Isn't the provision of a text based search an admission by the developers that the mass of icons approach does not work? I don't need to use a...

9 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

"Unity and GNOME 3 both abandon the old text-based cascading menus in favour of a graphical icon-driven system." Point truly missed. Both use a...

10 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

whs001 - Thank you, I'm glad you liked the article. I absolutely agree with you on your first point. I should perhaps have made it clearer that...

10 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Dennis Nilsson

If we allow corporate interest to dictate the way our government circumvents due process against foreign entities then we should accept the same...

11 hours ago by Dennis Nilsson via Facebook on ACTA stumbles in Germany
GHar123

I totally dislike pirating of works, I fear that artists will be deterred from creating works if they think that they are going to get ripped off....

12 hours ago by GHar123 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
JCB33

How dare film makers, artists or anybody that invests in creativity stop us pirating their works for free. I want to be able to walk into my local...

18 hours ago by JCB33 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
Moley

@GrueMaster. I prefer horses for courses rather than one size fits all. I, and I suspect most other computer users, do not really wish to have...

20 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
greycynic

The product that scares me every time I have to use it is the Office 2007 version of Excel. The first bug that I found was applying the median...

20 hours ago by greycynic on Ten flawed products that derail productivity
GrueMaster

Nice review and very informative. One thing I'd like to add (in reply to whs001's 1st question), the main reason to have the same interface from...

22 hours ago by GrueMaster on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Frederick Wrigley

I'be been using Mint 12 since the RC came out, and I am far more happy with the Cinnamon, the Mate, and, yes (with extensions), theGnome 3...

23 hours ago by Frederick Wrigley via Facebook on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
bdantas

Excellent article. One small correction, though--although a fresh installation of Linux Mint 12 will, indeed, provide the user with a version of...

23 hours ago by bdantas on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

24 hours ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

24 hours ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Moley

For Gnome 2 die-hards, it is possible to add icons to the bottom panel (or top top panel, if you prefer) which provide the exact Gnome 2...

1 day ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
ramwellian

Your comments would seem pretty naive and immature. Your 'solution' appears to be, "gee, let's all just give in to the hackers and give them...

1 day ago by ramwellian on Cloud computing security: no more oxymoron?