Site slams IE's security

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

NEWS
A group that prodded browser makers toward better standards compliance is urging people to abandon Microsoft's Internet Explorer.

The group has set up a Web site reminiscent of Apple Computer's "Real People" ad campaign, which urged people to switch from Microsoft's Windows operating system to the Macintosh. The site features first-person testimonials of people who switched from IE to alternatives.

"IE was a constant pain," reads the testimonial of entrepreneur David Catherall. "IE didn't feel intuitive at all and appeared to have been built by geeks with geeks in mind -- not novices. As time went on, I became more aware of and worried by the holes in the software which could lead to security issues."

Published by the Web Standards Project (WaSP), the campaign bears the sunny title "Browse Happy," but its message is a dark warning.

"Internet Explorer can make your computer unsafe," the site reads. "Why not switch to a browser that's more secure? Many already have. Read their stories, and choose a browser that's right for you."

The site is soliciting more testimonials from people who have switched from IE to an alternative browser.

Microsoft declined to comment directly on the site but expressed confidence in IE's ability to retain its massive following.

"We believe that customers will choose the browser that best meets their needs," a Microsoft representative said. "We believe that most will continue to choose IE when they evaluate all of the factors: end-user functionality, site and application compatibility, developer extensibility, enterprise manageability, and security backed by the processes and engineering discipline employed by Microsoft."

Microsoft's security practices, however, have led to a virtual outcry against the Web's leading browser.

WaSP cited recent recommendations by the US Computer Emergency Readiness Team -- a computer security partnership between the US government's Department of Homeland Security, the public sector and private sector -- against using IE because of its security problems.

"New security flaws are reported at an alarming rate, and major security organisations like the US Department of Homeland Security now recommend against its use," WaSP wrote on its Web site. "Internet Explorer, once the cream of the crop, is now a liability."

For alternatives to IE, the site lists the Mozilla Foundation's open-source browsers Mozilla and Firefox, Apple's open-source based Safari browser for use with recent versions of the Macintosh, and Opera Software's browser.

The Mozilla Foundation said it welcomed the campaign and acknowledged its similarity to Apple's conversion crusade -- with a caveat.

"It's just like Apple's thing," said Mozilla representative Bart Decrem. "But it feels very grassroots. This is one of hundreds of examples of individuals and groups organising themselves and spreading the word about modern Web browsers -- foremost among them Firefox. So in that sense, it's very different from Apple's thing. It's the community organising itself."

WaSP was founded in 1998 by Web site developers fed up with having to code their sites to work with an ever larger pool of nonstandard browsers. Last year, the group declared that it had accomplished its goals in promoting better standards compliance by Microsoft and other browser makers.

Microsoft last year said it planned to abandon development of a standalone IE, preferring instead to focus on integrating Web functionality into its new operating system, code-named Longhorn.

With Longhorn facing repeated delays, the company in recent months has been trying to resuscitate IE and its image. Amid speculation that IE's position might be eroding, Microsoft has made incremental improvements in the browser, mostly focused on security, through the recent Service Pack 2.

The company also hired an evangelist, Dave Massy, to promote IE. Massy did not respond to queries on this story.

WaSP blamed IE on a host of Internet ills, some only tangentially related to security.

"For those still using (IE), the Web is becoming an unpleasant place," the group wrote on its Web site. "Pop-up windows, insidious spyware, and viruses that transmit through its lax security make life difficult and costly for users. Innovative features available elsewhere that make the Web quicker, more accessible and more useful haven't found their way into IE. Microsoft has been slow to respond to these problems."

Talkback

Best wishes to all involved. Firefox is a pleasure to use, and a tribute to the powers of cooperation. Hope more people realise there are better alternatives to monopoly's products.

via Facebook 25 August, 2004 10:17
Reply

"We believe that most will continue to choose IE when they evaluate all of the factors: end-user functionality, site and application compatibility, developer extensibility, enterprise manageability, and security backed by the processes and engineering discipline employed by Microsoft."

Translation:

Most people will use IE because we forced it onto their computers a while ago. Hey, they can't even get rid of it!
Those who take all the factors I mentioned into account will use something else. In fact, they're probably already using Linux.

via Facebook 25 August, 2004 10:37
Reply

"Most people will use IE because we forced it onto their computers a while ago. Hey, they can't even get rid of it!
Those who take all the factors I mentioned into account will use something else. In fact, they're probably already using Linux."

LOL! That is so true. If everyone objectively evaluated what web-browser they should be using, IE would be dead.

And I'm using Linux now (but the lack of muiltimedia support is a bit admittedly)

via Facebook 25 August, 2004 13:41
Reply

This is the stuff that gets on my nerves now. I work in IT and I have used everything from Windows to Unix, IE to Firefox. Everyone keeps making a stink about Microsoft this Microsoft that. What these whining people don;t see that if you take the Microsoft option out of the picture then 80% of the users in this world won;t be able to open thier AOL or look at their son od daughters pictures. Microsoft tried their best to make the PC a more friendly place. I would love to see some of these people try and install in app in a different operating system or use another browser. Of course its going to have security flaws It has been the most dominate browser in the world why would i want to try and exploit an alternative browser when nobody uses it? I'm sure in 5 years or so we are all going to be complaining about the exploits in browser A or Browser B. Its funny how when one company makes a product that everyone uses everyone points out its flaws. EVERYTHING has it's exploit and instead of advanced users complaining and spreading propaganda trying to get un knoledgeable users to switch software, maybe we should all try and show these users how they can protect themselves from these exploits which primarily come from user ignorance. Now don't get me wrong I love anything that challenges the big MS but I have to give credit when credit is due. Without Microsoft my job would suck :)

via Facebook 25 August, 2004 22:29
Reply

May I say that I actually like IE? I would not like it if I had not installed IE's Web Accessories and Web Developer Accessories which allow me, among other things, to toggle images (which is why I stopped using Mozilla, because they removed this feature). And I don't think I would use IE if I had a broadband connection. However, with anti-virus and anti-spyware software, it is actually good ... if you are careful where you go and what you do.

via Facebook 26 August, 2004 00:39
Reply

This line is priceless:

The company also hired an evangelist, Dave Massy, to promote IE. Massy did not respond to queries on this story.

So basically, a company dominated by its marketing (and legal) departments, who goes out and hires someone specifically for the purpose of spreading information and praise about a product...has managed to find someone for that job who won't talk to the press.

Outstanding!

via Facebook 26 August, 2004 05:15
Reply

Anonymous-Retired: "I would not like it if I had not installed IE's Web Accessories and Web Developer Accessories which allow me, among other things, to toggle images"

Download Firefox
Download the NukeAnything Extension - lets you remove anything from a page

Optionally Download AdBlocker extension - lets you make filters that automaticlly prevent ad images form loading

Firefox has 141 ways of customizing your browser experience lsited at Mozilla.org. You can find more extensions at other sites. There is only 1 add-on listed in Microsofts site for IE6, the Rights Management Add-on. All of the other Add-ons for IE are for IE5 and are not supported for IE6.
From Microsoft's site: "Note: These Web Accessories are for use with Internet Explorer 5 and Internet Explorer 5.5 only; they do not work with Internet Explorer 6. "

IE6 has not had any non-patch work done on it since 2001. The next version of IE will only come out with the new Windows operating system. The current marketing scheme for IE7 is you want it you got to buy Windows Longhorn.

Yuck.

via Facebook 26 August, 2004 18:27
Reply

I DONT CARE FOR SECURITY.
and i love microsoft but.....
but there r still tons of other reasons to use alternate browsers:
1.faster :specially on slow connections.
2.tabbed brwosing(thats such a must)i hav around 20 tabs opened all the time . imagine having 20 IE windows.
3. integrated searching for upto 100 sites(customizable)
4.mouse gestures
5.plenty of keyboard shortcuts(customizable).
6. your own buttons for anything
Also there r still plenty of must hav features that ie just ignores. forget the blasted security thing look for a superior browsing experience, thats what rally matters(for me).

via Facebook 23 October, 2004 09:33
Reply

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

kevinmchapman

"the very significant number of users" and "many (most) of us" - you have no evidence for these statements. It is a fact that most users are saying...

5 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Marg Menzies Harrison

Another grammar faux pas is the improper use of "you". When sitting down down in a restaurant, for example, I get cringe when the waitress...

7 hours ago by Marg Menzies Harrison via Facebook on 10 flagrant grammar mistakes that make you look stupid
zdnetukuser

And NOW, folks, for Canonical's next trick... Kubuntu is late. Here's a pencil. Draw your own conclusions. cf.:...

7 hours ago by zdnetukuser on Linux Minterface
Moley

@kevinmchapman. The discussion here reflects the very significant number of users who really do like the traditional menu system and who wish to...

9 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

Er, no... It is an efficient means of finding the application/file/setting you need in one place. The icons are a simply a fallback for when you...

11 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

Isn't the provision of a text based search an admission by the developers that the mass of icons approach does not work? I don't need to use a...

12 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

"Unity and GNOME 3 both abandon the old text-based cascading menus in favour of a graphical icon-driven system." Point truly missed. Both use a...

13 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

whs001 - Thank you, I'm glad you liked the article. I absolutely agree with you on your first point. I should perhaps have made it clearer that...

13 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Dennis Nilsson

If we allow corporate interest to dictate the way our government circumvents due process against foreign entities then we should accept the same...

14 hours ago by Dennis Nilsson via Facebook on ACTA stumbles in Germany
GHar123

I totally dislike pirating of works, I fear that artists will be deterred from creating works if they think that they are going to get ripped off....

16 hours ago by GHar123 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
JCB33

How dare film makers, artists or anybody that invests in creativity stop us pirating their works for free. I want to be able to walk into my local...

21 hours ago by JCB33 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
Moley

@GrueMaster. I prefer horses for courses rather than one size fits all. I, and I suspect most other computer users, do not really wish to have...

23 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
greycynic

The product that scares me every time I have to use it is the Office 2007 version of Excel. The first bug that I found was applying the median...

23 hours ago by greycynic on Ten flawed products that derail productivity
GrueMaster

Nice review and very informative. One thing I'd like to add (in reply to whs001's 1st question), the main reason to have the same interface from...

1 day ago by GrueMaster on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Frederick Wrigley

I'be been using Mint 12 since the RC came out, and I am far more happy with the Cinnamon, the Mate, and, yes (with extensions), theGnome 3...

1 day ago by Frederick Wrigley via Facebook on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
bdantas

Excellent article. One small correction, though--although a fresh installation of Linux Mint 12 will, indeed, provide the user with a version of...

1 day ago by bdantas on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

1 day ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

1 day ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Moley

For Gnome 2 die-hards, it is possible to add icons to the bottom panel (or top top panel, if you prefer) which provide the exact Gnome 2...

1 day ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
ramwellian

Your comments would seem pretty naive and immature. Your 'solution' appears to be, "gee, let's all just give in to the hackers and give them...

1 day ago by ramwellian on Cloud computing security: no more oxymoron?