Symantec not threatened by Microsoft

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

NEWS

Symantec outlined plans on Tuesday to defend its large consumer security business, as Microsoft detailed its push to enter the anti-spyware and antivirus market.

Company CEO John Thompson, speaking at a keynote speech and roundtable at RSA Conference 2005 in San Francisco, said that Symantec would rely on the capabilities of its products to fend off the challenge. He said he would not rely on antitrust regulators, who keep an eye on Microsoft and the products it bundles in with its operating system.

"I don't plan to go to the Justice Department and whine about Microsoft's monopoly," Thompson said. "I'd rather fight Microsoft in the marketplace, because I'm sure we'll whip them."

Symantec's ability to defend its consumer business is critical to the company, given that half its revenue and its rapid growth have come from selling antivirus and other security software to home PC owners and small businesses.

On Tuesday, also at the RSA security show, Microsoft said it will offer spyware protection for free to licensed users of Windows. The software giant also plans to beef up browser-based spyware protections with Internet Explorer 7.0, which will be available for public testing by the summer.

Microsoft's anti-spyware technology was picked up in its acquisition of Giant, part of a spending spree that has sent shudders through the security industry. The Redmond, Washington-based software company announced last week that it plans to buy enterprise security developer Sybari Software.

Symantec plans to charge consumers for its own anti-spyware application, which is expected to be released during the first quarter. It has yet to announce a price for its spyware protection product for home and small business PCs.

Symantec holds the view that customers will be willing to pay for anti-spyware that not only detects threats but also removes them.

Although Thompson said he is confident Symantec can weather a Microsoft challenge, he noted he does not yet know the details of what his company is up against.

"When Microsoft shows up with a real product, then we'll see what it can really do," Thompson said.

At the RSA conference, Thompson also discussed the current shift in the security industry, where vendors are expanding beyond just offering technology to ward off worms, viruses and other threats. Security companies are also looking to develop products that offer corporate customers ways to store information and recover it easily after an attack.

"We are at the cusp of an enormous opportunity," Thompson said. "Where we once patrolled the borders, spotted the risks and raised the red flag, it's now about disaster recovery, systems availability and proactive protection of the network."

When the Slammer worm hit the Internet with a vengeance, it became evident that security companies needed to provide customers with the ability to bring back their data, Thompson said.

"We learned we had too narrow a view on what role we should play in protecting customers' assets," Thompson said. "We need to make information always secure and available. It's not enough just to make it just secure. That would be like putting all your information into a safe and forgetting the combination."

That realisation, Thompson said, is what prompted his company to seek its merger with Veritas, a large systems and storage management company, part of a wave of consolidation in the security market that is prompted by customers' demand for the new approach to data protection, he said.

Talkback

given their record, I wouldn't trust Microsoft with anything securty related.

In the security world:
Symantec is thought of as a world leader.
Microsoft i sthought of as a complete joke, with accompanying hurls of laughter.

via Facebook 16 February, 2005 17:21
Reply

Everybody hates both these companies, for different reasons. There are many new ones out, I use:

'Ad-Aware SE Personal' and 'Spybot - Search & Destroy', recently my computer stopped me from using the internet, I ran Norton AV and it took 3/4 of an hour to search my HDD of 300,000+ files, it found 27 problems and fixed 1, the rest I had to do manually - and couldnt'! (my internet still didn't work).

So I ran the two FREE software versions above and not having their definitions updated for 45days Ad-Aware SE Personal found 208 problems and fixed almost all of them, any it couldn't it did on the next reboot, the same with Spybot - Search & Destroy, which found several probs relating to the name of the virus, and fixed them.

You tell me why in 29 days I should bother renewing my subscription to Symantec? (its that time of year)

via Facebook 16 February, 2005 22:33
Reply

I have put Norton Internet Security on to two computers - one after a complete rebuild and re-formatting the hard disk, and still find that it takes very high system resources and the Anti-spam I have had to switch off since it stops the system dead. I can't help feeling that the Symantec CEO is living in a world of his own!

via Facebook 17 February, 2005 12:01
Reply

Marc, You are a student you say! you still have a lot to learn my lad.

via Facebook 17 February, 2005 16:52
Reply

Once MS markets this product with the milllion$ it has, Symantec is going down. It's Microsoft branded. I am not even familiar with Symantec.

There could even be Microsoft funded studies that claim their product is far superior, even though its not.

If I were Symantec I would be shifing into new markets. Maybe national security. Their oxygen is soon to run out.

via Facebook 18 February, 2005 12:04
Reply

MS Antispyware cannot threat anyone, lavasoft, spybot s&d, Norton. Because the Ideology MS had put into its own software and that is for example if you are going to install FlashGet, Antispyware blocks the whole application from instalation while SpyBot_S&D and Lavasoft let the software install and they kill the mallicious/adware modules of the software.

via Facebook 20 February, 2005 17:57
Reply

Well, if Microsoft is flexing its muscles to get into a market then I wonder how they would respond if most anti-virus and anti-spam vendors would unite and say to Microsoft (nothing in writing or in public ofcourse): stop now or we will wait a few days longer before making updated anti-virus signature files available for Windows system.

Ofcourse that wouldn't be fair at all but nevertheless, I do wonder how Microsoft would react if it faced such a reaction from (potential) competitors that abuse their current market position.

via Facebook 21 February, 2005 21:24
Reply

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

kevinmchapman

"the very significant number of users" and "many (most) of us" - you have no evidence for these statements. It is a fact that most users are saying...

4 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Marg Menzies Harrison

Another grammar faux pas is the improper use of "you". When sitting down down in a restaurant, for example, I get cringe when the waitress...

6 hours ago by Marg Menzies Harrison via Facebook on 10 flagrant grammar mistakes that make you look stupid
zdnetukuser

And NOW, folks, for Canonical's next trick... Kubuntu is late. Here's a pencil. Draw your own conclusions. cf.:...

6 hours ago by zdnetukuser on Linux Minterface
Moley

@kevinmchapman. The discussion here reflects the very significant number of users who really do like the traditional menu system and who wish to...

8 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

Er, no... It is an efficient means of finding the application/file/setting you need in one place. The icons are a simply a fallback for when you...

10 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

Isn't the provision of a text based search an admission by the developers that the mass of icons approach does not work? I don't need to use a...

11 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

"Unity and GNOME 3 both abandon the old text-based cascading menus in favour of a graphical icon-driven system." Point truly missed. Both use a...

11 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

whs001 - Thank you, I'm glad you liked the article. I absolutely agree with you on your first point. I should perhaps have made it clearer that...

11 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Dennis Nilsson

If we allow corporate interest to dictate the way our government circumvents due process against foreign entities then we should accept the same...

13 hours ago by Dennis Nilsson via Facebook on ACTA stumbles in Germany
GHar123

I totally dislike pirating of works, I fear that artists will be deterred from creating works if they think that they are going to get ripped off....

14 hours ago by GHar123 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
JCB33

How dare film makers, artists or anybody that invests in creativity stop us pirating their works for free. I want to be able to walk into my local...

20 hours ago by JCB33 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
Moley

@GrueMaster. I prefer horses for courses rather than one size fits all. I, and I suspect most other computer users, do not really wish to have...

22 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
greycynic

The product that scares me every time I have to use it is the Office 2007 version of Excel. The first bug that I found was applying the median...

22 hours ago by greycynic on Ten flawed products that derail productivity
GrueMaster

Nice review and very informative. One thing I'd like to add (in reply to whs001's 1st question), the main reason to have the same interface from...

24 hours ago by GrueMaster on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Frederick Wrigley

I'be been using Mint 12 since the RC came out, and I am far more happy with the Cinnamon, the Mate, and, yes (with extensions), theGnome 3...

1 day ago by Frederick Wrigley via Facebook on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
bdantas

Excellent article. One small correction, though--although a fresh installation of Linux Mint 12 will, indeed, provide the user with a version of...

1 day ago by bdantas on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

1 day ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

1 day ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Moley

For Gnome 2 die-hards, it is possible to add icons to the bottom panel (or top top panel, if you prefer) which provide the exact Gnome 2...

1 day ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
ramwellian

Your comments would seem pretty naive and immature. Your 'solution' appears to be, "gee, let's all just give in to the hackers and give them...

1 day ago by ramwellian on Cloud computing security: no more oxymoron?