Symantec outlined plans on Tuesday to defend its large consumer security business, as Microsoft detailed its push to enter the anti-spyware and antivirus market.
Company CEO John Thompson, speaking at a keynote speech and roundtable at RSA Conference 2005 in San Francisco, said that Symantec would rely on the capabilities of its products to fend off the challenge. He said he would not rely on antitrust regulators, who keep an eye on Microsoft and the products it bundles in with its operating system.
"I don't plan to go to the Justice Department and whine about Microsoft's monopoly," Thompson said. "I'd rather fight Microsoft in the marketplace, because I'm sure we'll whip them."
Symantec's ability to defend its consumer business is critical to the company, given that half its revenue and its rapid growth have come from selling antivirus and other security software to home PC owners and small businesses.
On Tuesday, also at the RSA security show, Microsoft said it will offer spyware protection for free to licensed users of Windows. The software giant also plans to beef up browser-based spyware protections with Internet Explorer 7.0, which will be available for public testing by the summer.
Microsoft's anti-spyware technology was picked up in its acquisition of Giant, part of a spending spree that has sent shudders through the security industry. The Redmond, Washington-based software company announced last week that it plans to buy enterprise security developer Sybari Software.
Symantec plans to charge consumers for its own anti-spyware application, which is expected to be released during the first quarter. It has yet to announce a price for its spyware protection product for home and small business PCs.
Symantec holds the view that customers will be willing to pay for anti-spyware that not only detects threats but also removes them.
Although Thompson said he is confident Symantec can weather a Microsoft challenge, he noted he does not yet know the details of what his company is up against.
"When Microsoft shows up with a real product, then we'll see what it can really do," Thompson said.
At the RSA conference, Thompson also discussed the current shift in the security industry, where vendors are expanding beyond just offering technology to ward off worms, viruses and other threats. Security companies are also looking to develop products that offer corporate customers ways to store information and recover it easily after an attack.
"We are at the cusp of an enormous opportunity," Thompson said. "Where we once patrolled the borders, spotted the risks and raised the red flag, it's now about disaster recovery, systems availability and proactive protection of the network."
When the Slammer worm hit the Internet with a vengeance, it became evident that security companies needed to provide customers with the ability to bring back their data, Thompson said.
"We learned we had too narrow a view on what role we should play in protecting customers' assets," Thompson said. "We need to make information always secure and available. It's not enough just to make it just secure. That would be like putting all your information into a safe and forgetting the combination."
That realisation, Thompson said, is what prompted his company to seek its merger with Veritas, a large systems and storage management company, part of a wave of consolidation in the security market that is prompted by customers' demand for the new approach to data protection, he said.






Talkback
given their record, I wouldn't trust Microsoft with anything securty related.
In the security world:
Symantec is thought of as a world leader.
Microsoft i sthought of as a complete joke, with accompanying hurls of laughter.
Everybody hates both these companies, for different reasons. There are many new ones out, I use:
'Ad-Aware SE Personal' and 'Spybot - Search & Destroy', recently my computer stopped me from using the internet, I ran Norton AV and it took 3/4 of an hour to search my HDD of 300,000+ files, it found 27 problems and fixed 1, the rest I had to do manually - and couldnt'! (my internet still didn't work).
So I ran the two FREE software versions above and not having their definitions updated for 45days Ad-Aware SE Personal found 208 problems and fixed almost all of them, any it couldn't it did on the next reboot, the same with Spybot - Search & Destroy, which found several probs relating to the name of the virus, and fixed them.
You tell me why in 29 days I should bother renewing my subscription to Symantec? (its that time of year)
I have put Norton Internet Security on to two computers - one after a complete rebuild and re-formatting the hard disk, and still find that it takes very high system resources and the Anti-spam I have had to switch off since it stops the system dead. I can't help feeling that the Symantec CEO is living in a world of his own!
Marc, You are a student you say! you still have a lot to learn my lad.
Once MS markets this product with the milllion$ it has, Symantec is going down. It's Microsoft branded. I am not even familiar with Symantec.
There could even be Microsoft funded studies that claim their product is far superior, even though its not.
If I were Symantec I would be shifing into new markets. Maybe national security. Their oxygen is soon to run out.
MS Antispyware cannot threat anyone, lavasoft, spybot s&d, Norton. Because the Ideology MS had put into its own software and that is for example if you are going to install FlashGet, Antispyware blocks the whole application from instalation while SpyBot_S&D and Lavasoft let the software install and they kill the mallicious/adware modules of the software.
Well, if Microsoft is flexing its muscles to get into a market then I wonder how they would respond if most anti-virus and anti-spam vendors would unite and say to Microsoft (nothing in writing or in public ofcourse): stop now or we will wait a few days longer before making updated anti-virus signature files available for Windows system.
Ofcourse that wouldn't be fair at all but nevertheless, I do wonder how Microsoft would react if it faced such a reaction from (potential) competitors that abuse their current market position.