Windows 2000 users miss out on IE7

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

NEWS

Microsoft has attracted a storm of criticism after confirming that it will not make the next version of Internet Explorer available to users of its Windows 2000 operating system.

Microsoft had previously kept quiet about whether IE7 would be available for Windows 2000, a version of Windows that will remain supported until 2010. "We have heard the requests for support of Windows 2000 but have nothing to announce at this time," Dave Massy, a programme manager on the IE team, said in a blog posting in February.

But in another blog posting at the end of last week, a Microsoft employee said that the company would not be releasing IE7 for Windows 2000, as this would involve a lot of work for an operating system that is in the later stages of its lifecycle.

"It should be no surprise that we do not plan on releasing IE7 for Windows 2000. One reason is where we are in the Windows 2000 lifecycle. Another is that some of the security work in IE7 relies on operating system functionality in XP SP2 that is non-trivial to port back to Windows 2000," Microsoft said in the blog posting.

Although Windows 2000 will remain supported until 2010, the operating system is due to move from mainstream to extended support at the end of June this year, which means that Microsoft will no longer accept requests for design changes or new features for the operating system.

A number of Microsoft blog readers were unhappy to learn that IE7 would be unavailable on Windows 2000.

One reader, known as Garry, said it was contradictory for Microsoft to offer support for Windows 2000 until 2010, but not to offer its users an up-to-date browser.

"An important point, as I see it, is that Microsoft is committed to provided extended support to Windows 2000 through 2010. I consider that [an] acknowledgement by Microsoft that businesses and consumers will be using Windows 2000 until at least that time, however, come 2010 they will still be using IE 6 SP1 which will surely be obsolete by that time," said Garry.

Microsoft was also criticised for building a Web browser that cannot run independently of the operating system.

"What kind of silliness is this — to build a insecure Web browser that is so tightly screwed into the nitty gritties of an operating system that it can neither benefit from the updates made to itself on another flavour of the same operating system, nor can it be taken out of the operating system," said one posting.

But, some readers celebrated this news, claiming that it was likely to improve the market share of alternative browsers such as the open source browser Firefox. " Cool, about 20 percent extra market share for Opera/Netscape/Mozilla/Firefox," was one comment.

IE7, which will be available in beta from this summer, will offer improved security features and basic tabbed browsing. It is also expected to offer improved standards support, including improved support for CSS 2 and PNG transparencies.

Talkback

.... and no doubt IE7 will require several security patches before the end of 2005 ::)

via Facebook 2 June, 2005 21:09
Reply

One can not help but wonder if Microsoft would even had bothered with IE7 if it wasn't for FireFox. Which raises the question of how consumer friendly (innovative enough for the right price at the right time) Microsoft really is.

So far I've only seen Microsoft copycat the work of its competitors and quite frankly, I'm not impressed by their "achievements". Mostly because of the strings attached and the half-baked results.

via Facebook 4 June, 2005 00:20
Reply

Why does anybody care? You can get Firefox for Windows 2000 right now. IE7, by most accounts, is just playing catch-up with Firefox anyway.

via Facebook 4 June, 2005 09:40
Reply

Because IE supports ActiveX which some people use, such as Microsoft Outlook Web Access or Windows Update. When these get updated to IE7, you won't be able to use IE6 or Windows 2000 anymore.

Plus, like it or not, most people still only test thier websites in Internet Explorer.

via Facebook 30 June, 2005 13:37
Reply

Oh.......... my........... god..........







CSS2?!





TRANSPARENT PNG's?!!

HOLY COW! That is awesome......







........wait.... Firefox has had this for........ how long now?

IE has been out for 3-4 years with NO major feature updates and SHIT for CSS support... M$... you suck... as soon as Linux supports Wifi out of box... I will never use/run/install/think about Windows again!!!!!!!

via Facebook 16 August, 2005 04:13
Reply

quote:

Plus, like it or not, most people still only test thier websites in Internet Explorer.


ME:

HAHAHA that is FUNNY! I have to use IE to test my stuff because I know it will work in Firefox... you know what... I spent 3 hours literally adding in "hacks" and workarounds to get a simple website to display properly in IE because of its AWFUL *nonexistant* support of CSS...

via Facebook 16 August, 2005 04:15
Reply

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

Moley

@kevinmchapman. The discussion here reflects the very significant number of users who really do like the traditional menu system and who wish to...

26 minutes ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

Er, no... It is an efficient means of finding the application/file/setting you need in one place. The icons are a simply a fallback for when you...

2 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

Isn't the provision of a text based search an admission by the developers that the mass of icons approach does not work? I don't need to use a...

3 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

"Unity and GNOME 3 both abandon the old text-based cascading menus in favour of a graphical icon-driven system." Point truly missed. Both use a...

4 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

whs001 - Thank you, I'm glad you liked the article. I absolutely agree with you on your first point. I should perhaps have made it clearer that...

4 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Dennis Nilsson

If we allow corporate interest to dictate the way our government circumvents due process against foreign entities then we should accept the same...

5 hours ago by Dennis Nilsson via Facebook on ACTA stumbles in Germany
GHar123

I totally dislike pirating of works, I fear that artists will be deterred from creating works if they think that they are going to get ripped off....

7 hours ago by GHar123 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
JCB33

How dare film makers, artists or anybody that invests in creativity stop us pirating their works for free. I want to be able to walk into my local...

12 hours ago by JCB33 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
Moley

@GrueMaster. I prefer horses for courses rather than one size fits all. I, and I suspect most other computer users, do not really wish to have...

15 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
greycynic

The product that scares me every time I have to use it is the Office 2007 version of Excel. The first bug that I found was applying the median...

15 hours ago by greycynic on Ten flawed products that derail productivity
GrueMaster

Nice review and very informative. One thing I'd like to add (in reply to whs001's 1st question), the main reason to have the same interface from...

16 hours ago by GrueMaster on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Frederick Wrigley

I'be been using Mint 12 since the RC came out, and I am far more happy with the Cinnamon, the Mate, and, yes (with extensions), theGnome 3...

17 hours ago by Frederick Wrigley via Facebook on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
bdantas

Excellent article. One small correction, though--although a fresh installation of Linux Mint 12 will, indeed, provide the user with a version of...

18 hours ago by bdantas on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

18 hours ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

18 hours ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Moley

For Gnome 2 die-hards, it is possible to add icons to the bottom panel (or top top panel, if you prefer) which provide the exact Gnome 2...

19 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
ramwellian

Your comments would seem pretty naive and immature. Your 'solution' appears to be, "gee, let's all just give in to the hackers and give them...

19 hours ago by ramwellian on Cloud computing security: no more oxymoron?
BugStalker

"Interesting thought ... If you installed Win7 as a dual boot on a machine that previously only had Linux, and it wrecked your Linux installation,...

19 hours ago by BugStalker on Windows 7 Declares War on GRUB
whs001

This is an excellent summary of Ubuntu and Mint and the interface differences between them. Most such articles take a very partisan position for...

19 hours ago by whs001 on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Moley

@ewallace. Not so clear. Anyone can obtain the text, for example from here http://www.ustr.gov/webfm_send/2379. I support ACTA so long as it and...

20 hours ago by Moley on ACTA: Facts, misconceptions and questions