Microsoft stakes application future on integration

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

Topics

Microsoft

NEWS

As Microsoft prepares to launch highly-anticipated new versions of many of its applications, the company is banking on the pervasiveness of its software and its ability to integrate the products together.

The launches of its next ERP system, Great Plains 9.0, and Microsoft CRM 3.0 are now "just days away". In preparation, the company has stepped up its public relations activity with an interactive exhibition in London and is offering discounts and special deals on products such as CRM 3.0, prior to launch.

According to Paul White, director of the Microsoft Business Solutions Group in the UK, the emphasis will not so much on products as on showing how Microsoft and other products can work together.

"Five years ago, when people talked about complete integration, it just meant you could highlight some fields in an ERP application and drop them into Excel," White told ZDNet UK.

"What we are talking about now are forms, that might be developed in Word, being driven by the workflow system and appearing within the ERP application and SharePoint, [which is] the means by which parts of the application may be deployed to individuals who may be working from home."

White believes the latest products will "put us some way ahead of the field".

The lead will come "through better integration, through the ERP and CRM applications and everything else that Microsoft does", said White. "It's not because our ERP application is 5 percent better than Oracle Financials, it's because people want to use our ERP system as it is easier and more familiar."

In the CRM space, Microsoft will be taking on the likes of Siebel and Salesforce.com and, according to James Utzschneider, general manager of product marketing for Microsoft Business Solutions, it has key advantages over both. 

With Microsoft CRM "the entire application works on-line and off-line [so] you can sit on the Tube and go through the entire functionality of the application," he said. "With Salesforce.com you are chained to the Internet."

Utzschneider also stressed "the complete integration" of CRM 3.0 with  Microsoft Outlook. "That means that sales people walk up to it and say, 'I know how to use these because I know how to use Outlook'. So having all of my mail managed by the CRM system without having to go into a separate environment -- we just think it makes them more productive."

But Chris Boorman, Salesforce.com's vice-president for Europe, questioned the advantage of being able to use your laptop to access CRM. "Wants to use their laptop while being bounced around on the Tube?," he asks. "You want to be able to use your Blackberry, not your PC, and we have that," Boorman said.

Microsoft's Utzschneider claims a third key advantage in the applications market -- Microsoft's vast army of developers. "We offer an unsurpassed level of customisation that you can do within the applications," he said. "There are 250 independent software vendors whose products run on top of the system right now."

Next week, Microsoft is hosting Life2, a invite-only showcase for Microsoft products that White said will be "not a show of products but will show how the technology works". There will be a heavy focus on the small and, especially, medium-sized business in the UK. The show takes place at Chelsea Harbour.

Talkback

They try to be on every market. All the costumers get is a bad product (vista = DRM/Palladium for example.).
So why don't Microsoft try to be on a few market areas and try a little bit harder to make good software.
Monopoly companys sucks...

via Facebook 29 October, 2005 00:03
Reply

Bullocks. Various existing Microsoft Windows products don't even have the same user interface (different commands to get the same results and all that). So Microsoft's argument that 'more of the same' is better is simply bogus.

Last time I checked plenty of people can very quickly learn what commands to use to get things done within whatever program. Ask anyone who installed whatever game on whatever platform (PlayStation, Xbox, PC, whatever).

As for the integration. Yeah right. Microsoft definition of integration is simply: use whatever we offer last. In other words: pay for whatever we RTM'd lately. Don't like? Well, use it it the meantime anyway and wait for whatever we offer next. Just don't go looking for alternatives. We're very afraid you might like it that much more. Especially the price.

via Facebook 30 October, 2005 20:37
Reply

Integration leads to open doors, which is why MS is a major security risk.

via Facebook 31 October, 2005 14:11
Reply

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

kevinmchapman

"the very significant number of users" and "many (most) of us" - you have no evidence for these statements. It is a fact that most users are saying...

7 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Marg Menzies Harrison

Another grammar faux pas is the improper use of "you". When sitting down down in a restaurant, for example, I get cringe when the waitress...

9 hours ago by Marg Menzies Harrison via Facebook on 10 flagrant grammar mistakes that make you look stupid
zdnetukuser

And NOW, folks, for Canonical's next trick... Kubuntu is late. Here's a pencil. Draw your own conclusions. cf.:...

9 hours ago by zdnetukuser on Linux Minterface
Moley

@kevinmchapman. The discussion here reflects the very significant number of users who really do like the traditional menu system and who wish to...

11 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

Er, no... It is an efficient means of finding the application/file/setting you need in one place. The icons are a simply a fallback for when you...

13 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

Isn't the provision of a text based search an admission by the developers that the mass of icons approach does not work? I don't need to use a...

14 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

"Unity and GNOME 3 both abandon the old text-based cascading menus in favour of a graphical icon-driven system." Point truly missed. Both use a...

15 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

whs001 - Thank you, I'm glad you liked the article. I absolutely agree with you on your first point. I should perhaps have made it clearer that...

15 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Dennis Nilsson

If we allow corporate interest to dictate the way our government circumvents due process against foreign entities then we should accept the same...

16 hours ago by Dennis Nilsson via Facebook on ACTA stumbles in Germany
GHar123

I totally dislike pirating of works, I fear that artists will be deterred from creating works if they think that they are going to get ripped off....

17 hours ago by GHar123 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
JCB33

How dare film makers, artists or anybody that invests in creativity stop us pirating their works for free. I want to be able to walk into my local...

23 hours ago by JCB33 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
Moley

@GrueMaster. I prefer horses for courses rather than one size fits all. I, and I suspect most other computer users, do not really wish to have...

1 day ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
greycynic

The product that scares me every time I have to use it is the Office 2007 version of Excel. The first bug that I found was applying the median...

1 day ago by greycynic on Ten flawed products that derail productivity
GrueMaster

Nice review and very informative. One thing I'd like to add (in reply to whs001's 1st question), the main reason to have the same interface from...

1 day ago by GrueMaster on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Frederick Wrigley

I'be been using Mint 12 since the RC came out, and I am far more happy with the Cinnamon, the Mate, and, yes (with extensions), theGnome 3...

1 day ago by Frederick Wrigley via Facebook on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
bdantas

Excellent article. One small correction, though--although a fresh installation of Linux Mint 12 will, indeed, provide the user with a version of...

1 day ago by bdantas on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

1 day ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

1 day ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Moley

For Gnome 2 die-hards, it is possible to add icons to the bottom panel (or top top panel, if you prefer) which provide the exact Gnome 2...

1 day ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
ramwellian

Your comments would seem pretty naive and immature. Your 'solution' appears to be, "gee, let's all just give in to the hackers and give them...

1 day ago by ramwellian on Cloud computing security: no more oxymoron?