The Massachusetts Senate has introduced a provision to an economic stimulus bill that endangers a state decision to standardise on the OpenDocument format.
An amendment to Senate bill 2256, published on Wednesday, proposes the creation of a four-person information technology task force to approve technical standards in the state. The Senate is scheduled on Thursday to discuss the bill, known as the Commonwealth Investment Act.
The introduction of the amendment follows a hearing on Monday where the chair of a state Senate watchdog committee, Marc Pacheco, criticised a decision by the IT Division of Massachusetts to standardise on OpenDocument, an open document format for desktop productivity applications.
In a closely watched move, the IT Division of Massachusetts finalised a policy last month that mandates that products used by agencies in the executive branch comply with the OpenDocument standard, which is also called the Open Document Format for Office Applications, or ODF.
By using the OpenDocument standard, the IT Division said that state documents will be readable hundreds of years from now. The chief information officer, Peter Quinn, also said that a move to OpenDocument-based products will save the state money.
Sun's StarOffice suite complies with the OpenDocument format and many other companies, including IBM, Novell, Adobe and smaller firms, have voiced their interest in the format. Microsoft, by contrast, said it does not intend to support OpenDocument natively in its dominant Office suite.
At the hearing on Monday, Pacheco criticised the process behind IT Division's decision. He questioned the division's authority to set state policy on technical standards.
Also at the hearing, the state supervisor of public records, Alan Cote, condemned the move, claiming it could result in lost electronic records.
The General Counsel of the IT Division, Linda Hamel, argued at the hearing on Monday the division has authority to set standards and that the CIO's office has sought to work with other state agencies to set its overall policies.
Some observers said that the IT Division's decision has caused a stir in part because of Massachusetts politics. One government official on Monday said there is a turf war over electronic records between the IT Division, which reports to the Secretary of Administration and Finance, and the public records office, which reports to the Secretary of the Commonwealth.
The bill, if adopted, would impose an added approval step to state policy decisions.
"An executive agency or department shall not adopt or implement a policy, practice or standard concerning information technology standards or systems or the procurement or use of hardware, software, and cellular phones and other electronic devices, without the affirmative approval of the task force by majority vote," the bill states.
The four task force members would be appointed by the governor and at least two of them will be representatives from the business community.
Talkback
Who's giving head to who here?
Basicly this sums up who's owning who. Not who's protecting who's interests at what level.
Since when can politicians get something done within a few days without calling all sorts of (illegal) favours?
The bill introduced basilcly states that only the commercially motivated have a majority vote as to what is allowed or not. How stupid can one get?
In short, the bill, if adopted, would put the self interested (US) commerciallly motivated in charge and and such should be rejected in whole by the EU. Which shouldn't be a problem . By standard anything that only has a self interest guided policy towards the USA standards should be rejected by the EU by default giving that normally the US has their own self interest in mind so why shouldn't the EU?
Lemme guess... Bill gates gets to appoint the task force members?
Sounds like Brother Bill is dropping some cash. If there
is a standard, then it should be a standard for everyone. MS has never accepted the standards of the world, instead creating its own "standard" hoping the world will follow them.