ANALYSIS
And who said it wouldn't last?
After a contentious, protracted courtship, the Oracle-PeopleSoft
merger has hit its one-year anniversary mark, with the post-merger
marriage going relatively smoothly. PeopleSoft customers have not
defected en masse in search of better software applications, and Oracle
executives have touted a relatively quick integration of the two former
rivals since the deal closed last year on 7 January.
But while the operations of the newly combined company have largely
moved ahead as planned, the overall success of the merger in its first
year has been a mixed bag. The company's stock remains lacklustre, and
uncertainty still persists as to whether PeopleSoft customers will
ultimately adopt Oracle's software once the technologies are integrated
into its line of Fusion applications that are slated to hit the market
in 2008.
"It's like saying the operation was a success, but we still have to
figure out what to do with the patient's third leg," said Bruce
Richardson, an analyst at AMR Research. "With the merger, Oracle got
operating efficiency, but you have to ask yourself, what else did they
get, once the dust settles."
Oracle has been able to retain more than 95 percent of PeopleSoft
support customers following the merger, said Jeb Dasteel,
vice-president of Oracle global customer programs. While the company
ideally hoped to hang on to all customers, it set a goal of 94 percent
to 96 percent retention, he added.
"We listened to the voice of the customer and helped them with the
transition. We've done a good job at keeping a finger on the pulse of
PeopleSoft customers as they have migrated to the Oracle environment,"
Dasteel said.
Before the merger's close, PeopleSoft customers had several looming concerns.
"They were mostly worried about Oracle [bilking] them on maintenance
costs," Richardson said. Oracle and other enterprise software makers
typically charge customers an annual fee, based on a percentage of the
software licensing cost, for upgrades and bug fixes.
Customers were also leery of Oracle discontinuing support and
development for the PeopleSoft applications they were running, he
added. These software suites can sometimes cost millions of dollars and
often require additional assistance from consultants to install,
Richardson noted.
That concern was particularly valid, given comments that Oracle's
chief executive, Larry Ellison, made shortly after announcing plans to
launch a hostile takeover attempt of PeopleSoft. Ellison touted plans
to discontinue PeopleSoft products and push customers to Oracle's
software.
One PeopleSoft customer noted that there have been few surprises from Oracle since the merger closed.
"It's gone fairly well, even though I'm no fan of Oracle," said Peg
Nicholson, former president of PeopleSoft's International Customer
Advisory Board. "They took a short amount of time to figure out what
they wanted to do, and they communicated that information to us
quickly."
As the 2003 ICAB president, she had voiced concerns that the merger
would reduce competition and leave consumers with few alternatives if
Oracle dropped support for PeopleSoft products.
And while Nicholson, chief information officer at golf ball maker
Acushnet, agreed the level of customer support hasn't declined, she
noted that wasn't exactly a hard thing to accomplish.
"It's no worse, but it's hard to believe...
For more, click here...