You spend a big percentage of your revenue on research and development. What kind of challenges do you see there?
We tackle some of the hardest problems in the world, like the credit card fraud thing which is incredibly complex. Look at Home Depot. They want us to help them price every single item in a store. If a competitor is across the street they have got to make sure for all those items that they carry, they have similar prices. That is a huge, enormous operations research and computing problem. Now we are talking about 72 hours of computing on some of the fastest computers. It can take them 72 hours to compute the price on 200,000 SKUs (items) across 1,000 different stores and have a different price in every store to optimise profit.We love those challenges.
What do you see as the biggest differences between Europe and America when it comes to software?
In the software market I don't see any difference at all. There are a few different products, such as Basel II, that we have sold a lot more of here than in the US but we have seen a lot more money laundering products sold in the US because of the US Patriot Act.
But now the Norwegian government has imposed money laundering restrictions there and all of a sudden we now process 80 percent of all cheques in Norway. And we turn it over to their police when we find exceptions. But then they don't know what to do with it, unfortunately. Because the police are so far behind there.
Do you think you will move the company more into consulting?
I never wanted SAS to be a consulting company, I just wanted to be a software company. About 10 percent of our revenues are consulting.
If you look at Siebel in their last year, we sold about four times more software than they did. They were a services company. Two thirds of Siebel's revenue was consulting. It's so damn hard to install that people had to spend twice that to make it work.
The sales force automation tools were really hard to install and once they were up and running the sales people don't want to use them. Why? They want to keep it all in that little notebook. It's the mentality of the sales people that defeated Siebel. Cognos is the same way. Last year two thirds of their revenue was consulting. A lot of software companies bring a lot of their revenue in from consulting. We don't. I have never really had a very profitable consulting business because the sales people talk 'em into doing stuff for nothing.
Who are your competitors?
Oh, we have about 200. Number one competitor is Oracle. We run into Oracle in about 10 percent of our sales situations. SAP is about 8 percent. Cognos about the same. Business Objects is about 5 percent. We have so many different products and every market we are in has different competitors. We like different competition.
Some times we get so bored with competing with the same companies that we go out and write some new software so we can compete against somebody new.
You have just been celebrating 30 years of SAS. Do you ever think about what's next?
Death. (Laughs.) Well, I have a golf course and I can say that as many times as I have played it I have never parred it and I don't think I ever will.
I enjoy golf about 25 times a year. I skied 10 days this winter.
I have a condominium out in Steamboat Springs, Colorado, with fantastic skiing. I am just so active and so enjoying life right now. I'm a member of the International Business Council, which is a group of 100 global CEOs who are sort of advisers to the World Economic Forum and I am on the Business Round Table in the US which is 200 CEOs from all over the country. We get into very stimulating and interesting discussions.






Talkback
Having several years experience in SAS, been involved in beta-testing of several SAS products and in migration to SAS 9 revolution, I was really amazed by some of the Jim's declarations.
First of all I want to point out that I will give my reactions about the BI solution provided by SAS, not the SAS Base product.
I never ever saw such a buggy and such a badly packaged application.
To illustrate my opinion, I am taking 3 simple examples:
1) Classes subject to change in released products
2) Entreprise Guide (EG) 4.1 installation.
3) Service Pack (SP) 4 Upgrade to Entreprise BI Server
1) Classes subject to change in released products
simply go to: http://support.sas.com/rnd/gendoc/bi/api/Portal/com/sas/webapp/contextsharing/RequestActionMenuData.html
2) I recently bought a new portable, running XP SP2. When trying to install EG3, it fails saying my version of MFC Shared Library was not up to date. Indeed, EG3 requires version 7.0 or higher ... and the version on my laptop is 7.1 ... moreover, the 7.0 version is also available on my laptop. To avoid the problem, I had to install EG4.1 that I had to order. Unfortunately, EG4.1 requires the recently SP4 to be installed on server components.
3) So we decided to apply the SP4 on our server products. We downloaded the SP4 from the SAS support site and read the installations instructions from http://support.sas.com/documentation/onlinedoc/biupgrade/bi_31_upgrade.pdf
Reading the document, you will rapidly understand you have first to remove any previous client installation and to install newer version of them ... strange step for a simple Service Pack upgrade ... to install newer version of client products ... but you don't have them and you can't find them on the SAS web site ... so you have to order them...
Well I am not going further here, just wanted to give some hints on how I found Jim to be knowledgeless of the quality level of products his company is delivering ... not that different from Oracle, Microsoft and others.
Finally, what about a SAS/Access to Firebird ??? :-)
I fully share your opinion Pascal, we are exactly facing similar problems.
We developed a Java Web Based application on top of SAS Entreprise BI Server and we used some SAS classes marked as stable in the documentation we get with the installation medias... if you now look at the same classes on the SAS web site, they are flagged "Subject to Change" ...
We are also busy with the Service Pack 4 installation for SAS 9.1.3 ... well, it looks we better have to speak about a migration to SP4. We are busy with this since several days ...we called SAS yesterday to get all the needed Medias regarding our installation, in addition to the SP4 download available on the SAS web site ... we received 9 CDs ... none of them contains the components we need most ... so we have to ask for additional medias ... We will have by the way more than 10 CDs to apply on an installation that initially requires about the same amount of medias. Do we better have to speak about a new release ???
Compared to the "effort" we have to put in the SP1 installation for Microsoft SQL Server 2005 and its BI clients, it becomes really ridiculous. Including download time and installation procedures, it took us not more than 30 minutes to have it done ...
Forget to add this in my post:
It becomes unacceptable for us to apply so heavy procedures on our production environment ... and what will we be facing with the so called next release (SAS 9.2) ?