The catch in 'free' Solaris 8

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

NEWS
Although Sun Microsystems downplayed "Free Solaris" programs during the Solaris 8 launch Wednesday in New York City, it was Sun's licensing terms that most interested the financial analysts and journalists in attendance. Executives at Sun were careful to avoid linking the new Solaris 8 licencing terms to Sun's maligned Sun Community Source License (SCSL). Sun had been working for more than a year to offer Solaris under SCSL but was stymied by the fact that it didn't own all the intellectual property inside Solaris. It also was stung by criticism from open-source advocates that Sun was attempting to pass off SCSL as the equivalent of GPL, the Gnu Public Licence. SCSL required developers to return bug fixes to Sun, maintain compatibility and pay fees to Sun when they ship binaries based on Sun source code. Instead, on Wednesday Sun created a new, separate category to cover Solaris source and binary (aka runtime) licences. These new licences are just two of a growing number of different types of software licences that Sun will offer in the coming months. On the source side, Sun is making Solaris free to education, research, appliance and telco OEMs and interested software vendors. Source licensors can evaluate, examine and use the code for free, paying $75 (£46) for the media kit and shipping only. But any modifications made to the Solaris 8 source may be shared with others only if they are relayed through Sun. On the binary side, Sun is offering two "Free Solaris" options. Source-code licensors may generate binary copies of standard Solaris 8 from the source code but must meet daunting criteria in order to redistribute modified binaries outside the licensor's organisation: A licensor must enter a formal agreement with Sun, which may stipulate royalty payments; obtain "backline" and source-code support contracts from Sun; provide Sun with documentation (and training, if needed) about the changes made to the Solaris 8 source code; and maintain interoperability and compatibility -- measured by Sun's compatibility test -- with the standard version of Solaris throughout the product's lifetime. Or, via the Free Solaris Binary Licence, Sun is offering interested parties free use of Solaris 8 on systems with eight or fewer processors. Again, a $75 media charge is levied. Binary licensors also get a free development licence of Oracle's 8I, iPlanet software and a free copy of Sun's StarOffice desktop suite. Sound a lot more complicated than plain, old open-source? It is. But complications didn't stop Sun's competitors from poking holes in Sun's "free" pitch. "We've been offering AIX for free for a number of years," said Miles Barel, program director of Unix brand marketing for IBM's enterprise systems group. "Sun's just trying to create confusion about what's going on in the Linux community. You still need to pay Sun to resell the code. And it's not clear you get the whole (Solaris) code anyway. "They made the source code visible but not available," added Barel, who acknowledged that IBM considered a similar scheme. Instead, IBM is now negotiating with the open-source community -- the keeper of the Linux source-code flame, Linus Torvalds, himself, IBM claims -- regarding AIX components that IBM might provide to the Linux community. Sun archrival Microsoft -- which was the butt of many of Sun's jabs at the Solaris 8 launch -- likewise picked apart Sun's strategy. "Sun's operating-system prices have always been part of the system price, anyways," said Chris Ray, product manager of Windows 2000 for Microsoft. "They're still talking about charging lots of money for add-ons like clustering, which can cost more than $50,000 per node in some cases." Sun acknowledged during the Solaris 8 launch that it will, indeed, charge for "add-ons" like its New Moon Version 3 clustering software, which it plans to ship within the next few months. But Sun won't charge for client-access licences like Microsoft and Novell do, Sun officials emphasised. Solaris will continue to offer unlimited client, multi-user support as part of the Solaris server base fee. "You make money on services," explains Sun President and Chief Operating Officer Ed Zander. "Things like support and consulting contracts. We're moving Solaris from an up-front-fee to back-end-services" play, he said. Other Sun officials acknowledged that the free licences introduced Wednesday are aimed primarily for internal commercial use and development, not for enterprises attempting to run their businesses. Sun will begin shipping Solaris 8 commercially on March 5. Media kits for Free Solaris versions will be available later in the spring. What do you think? Tell the Mailroom. And read what others have said.

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

JCB33

How dare film makers, artists or anybody that invests in creativity stop us pirating their works for free. I want to be able to walk into my local...

4 hours ago by JCB33 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
Moley

@GrueMaster. I prefer horses for courses rather than one size fits all. I, and I suspect most other computer users, do not really wish to have...

6 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
greycynic

The product that scares me every time I have to use it is the Office 2007 version of Excel. The first bug that I found was applying the median...

6 hours ago by greycynic on Ten flawed products that derail productivity
GrueMaster

Nice review and very informative. One thing I'd like to add (in reply to whs001's 1st question), the main reason to have the same interface from...

7 hours ago by GrueMaster on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Frederick Wrigley

I'be been using Mint 12 since the RC came out, and I am far more happy with the Cinnamon, the Mate, and, yes (with extensions), theGnome 3...

8 hours ago by Frederick Wrigley via Facebook on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
bdantas

Excellent article. One small correction, though--although a fresh installation of Linux Mint 12 will, indeed, provide the user with a version of...

9 hours ago by bdantas on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

9 hours ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

9 hours ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Moley

For Gnome 2 die-hards, it is possible to add icons to the bottom panel (or top top panel, if you prefer) which provide the exact Gnome 2...

10 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
ramwellian

Your comments would seem pretty naive and immature. Your 'solution' appears to be, "gee, let's all just give in to the hackers and give them...

10 hours ago by ramwellian on Cloud computing security: no more oxymoron?
BugStalker

"Interesting thought ... If you installed Win7 as a dual boot on a machine that previously only had Linux, and it wrecked your Linux installation,...

11 hours ago by BugStalker on Windows 7 Declares War on GRUB
whs001

This is an excellent summary of Ubuntu and Mint and the interface differences between them. Most such articles take a very partisan position for...

11 hours ago by whs001 on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Moley

@ewallace. Not so clear. Anyone can obtain the text, for example from here http://www.ustr.gov/webfm_send/2379. I support ACTA so long as it and...

11 hours ago by Moley on ACTA: Facts, misconceptions and questions
45283

I think WinRT is fantastic. I just wish it was an option for people that didn't want to go through Microsoft's App Store with its attendant...

14 hours ago by 45283 on Why Windows 8 needs architectural hygiene for WOA
Burn-IT

Nine people? £30m? Who's back pocket is that lot going in? And IF they say it is for new buildings, what about all the ones the government has...

15 hours ago by Burn-IT on Police set to launch three £30m e-crime hubs
ewallace

Just to be clear, nobody knows what is in the text of ACTA, here is a photograph of the text of ACTA http://twitpic.com/8h9iju as submitted to the...

15 hours ago by ewallace on ACTA: Facts, misconceptions and questions
fgvrg56

Unfortunately main issue is that ASUS is refusing to accept that they make some mistake on this version of asus Transformer prime. 1 - GPS sensor...

16 hours ago by fgvrg56 on Asus Eee Pad Transformer Prime Wi-Fi & GPS problems?
Ben Woods

@Marcus A fair question. Just talked with Archos which said it was working on an announcement for next week....

18 hours ago by Ben Woods on Archos confirms G9 Ice Cream Sandwich update schedule
Marcus Karlsson

Any update on this, considering the claimed "first week of February"?

19 hours ago by Marcus Karlsson via Facebook on Archos confirms G9 Ice Cream Sandwich update schedule
apexwm

Bill Goodrich : Just as al_langevin pointed out, with Windows Server 2008 there is no Services for Macintosh anymore. It's gone, not available....

1 day ago by apexwm on Windows Server 2008 drops the ball for Mac compatibility