Pentium 4: Worth the price?

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

NEWS
Intel, which revealed a host of new details about its Pentium 4 processor this week at the Intel Developer Forum, is betting the chip will become the most desirable engine for high-horsepower PCs. But for analysts attending the conference, the big question was: why pay more for a Pentium 4 when a Pentium III may be faster? At the Developer Forum, the chip maker used two near-production systems to show off the Pentium 4's multimedia capabilities, including real-time video capture and 3D graphics rendering. "Everything is much faster, but it's not going to run as fast as a 1.5GHz Pentium III chip would, if you had that," said Steven Leibson, editor-in-chief of the Microprocessor Report. The current Pentium III tops out at 1.13GHz. Slated to ship in the fourth quarter, the Pentium 4 promises higher clock speeds -- including 1.3GHz, 1.4GHz and 1.5GHz early next year -- but analysts said it would not blow Pentium III out of the water. In fact, compared with a Pentium III chip at the same clock speed, the Pentium 4 could run up to 20 percent slower, some analysts said. Although its clock speed doesn't necessarily translate into a doubling or tripling of performance, it will give Pentium 4 a decent boost. How will the Pentium 4 perform alongside Advanced Micro Devices's Athlon chips, with its Mustang processor core? Since analysts have yet to receive chips to test, Leibson said. "It's too soon to tell." The Pentium 4 does have other advantages over the Pentium III, analysts said. It packs an improved floating point unit and a new set of multimedia instructions, called SSE2, that allow the chip to process multimedia in parallel, thereby speeding performance. So far, no software optimised for the Pentium 4's architecture has been announced, and that makes for another performance hit. That will change as developers begin to write applications for the architecture and the SSE2 instruction set. Instead of optimising the design for the current generation 0.18-micron technology, Intel "made the [Pentium 4] design to take much better advantage of the next process step [0.13]," said Leibson. Mike Feibus, principal analyst at Mercury Research, said the end result will be a chip that runs anywhere between 20 percent and 200 percent faster, depending on the application. Consumers who buy a Pentium 4 system to use as a word processor will see only a relatively small bump in performance. On the other hand, consumers using it for high-end graphics will see a significant improvement, according to Feibus, who said, "I think [Intel] is going to focus on audio/video enthusiasts." Pricing is also likely to preclude buyers of most PCs -- usually priced in the $900 to $1,000 range -- from using the new chip to write email. Analysts such as Feibus predict Pentium 4 systems with Rambus direct RAM (RDRAM) will run at least $2,000 to $2,500. That makes sense in the early stages, he said, "When you look at the makeup of the market today, even AMD isn't shipping hundreds of thousands of high-end chips." The chip measures 217mm square, sources said, roughly twice the size of the Pentium III. With its manufacturing capabilities already constrained, analysts said Intel is unlikely to produce the Pentium 4 in any significant volume until the company implements the 0.13-micron manufacturing process. Intel's Albert Yu acknowledged the Pentium 4 would come with a higher price tag, "But as the volume builds [prices will fall]. There's nothing new here." Even with the additional cost of RDRAM, Yu believes that customers will still chose Pentium 4. "The pricing is very much in the hands of the RDRAM suppliers," Yu said. "We're working with them on that issue. A little premium over SDRAM is okay, but not what we've got now. The premium is way too high," he said. Intel chose Rambus, he said, because, "When we introduce a new platform, we should deliver the best possible performance. We believe that the Pentium 4 with RDRAM will be the best possible performance." "As a consumer, if I could get something more interesting for a couple hundred more, I would do it," Yu said. But the Pentium III chip will live on for "some time", he said. As Yu sees it, the Pentium 4 will be at the high end of Intel's product line, the Pentium III will remain in the mainstream, and Intel's Celeron chip, made for value PCs, will cover the low end of the market. Consumers may adopt Pentium 4 first, but companies will likely stick with the Pentium III until Pentium 4 prices come down. The Pentium 4 is larger than the Pentium III, which means the newer chip has room for more transistors: 42 million, compared with 28 million for the Pentium III. Intel also disclosed that the Pentium 4's Level 2 cache size will be 256KB, and it will get a 400MHz system bus. The system bus provides a pipeline between the chip and I/O subsystems of a PC, such as memory. At the forum, Intel demonstrated versions of the chip running at 1.4GHz and 1.5GHz. During his Tuesday keynote speech, Yu showed off a 2.0GHz Pentium 4. The demonstration, designed to show the new chip's potential, began with a Pentium 4 system with a chip running at 1.5GHz and rose to a clock speed of 2.0GHz without any special cooling. The Pentium 4 is not expected to reach 2.0GHz until the latter half of 2001. The demo was really meant to show the chip's potential, Yu explained. So, in order to pull it off, Intel picked a Pentium 4 chip that was running at a higher clock speed. When processors are manufactured, they yield a fairly wide distribution of clock speeds, much like a bell curve. Intel went to the high-end of the curve, choosing a Pentium 4 chip running at 1.8GHz, or possibly 1.9GHz, and tweaked it to run at 2.0GHz. Adjustments were also made to the system bus for the demonstration. See Chips Central for daily hardware news, including an interactive timeline of AMD and Intel's upcoming product launches. What do you think? Tell the Mailroom. And read what others have said.

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

GrueMaster

Nice review and very informative. One thing I'd like to add (in reply to whs001's 1st question), the main reason to have the same interface from...

27 minutes ago by GrueMaster on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Frederick Wrigley

I'be been using Mint 12 since the RC came out, and I am far more happy with the Cinnamon, the Mate, and, yes (with extensions), theGnome 3...

1 hour ago by Frederick Wrigley via Facebook on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
bdantas

Excellent article. One small correction, though--although a fresh installation of Linux Mint 12 will, indeed, provide the user with a version of...

2 hours ago by bdantas on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

2 hours ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

3 hours ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Moley

For Gnome 2 die-hards, it is possible to add icons to the bottom panel (or top top panel, if you prefer) which provide the exact Gnome 2...

3 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
ramwellian

Your comments would seem pretty naive and immature. Your 'solution' appears to be, "gee, let's all just give in to the hackers and give them...

3 hours ago by ramwellian on Cloud computing security: no more oxymoron?
BugStalker

"Interesting thought ... If you installed Win7 as a dual boot on a machine that previously only had Linux, and it wrecked your Linux installation,...

4 hours ago by BugStalker on Windows 7 Declares War on GRUB
whs001

This is an excellent summary of Ubuntu and Mint and the interface differences between them. Most such articles take a very partisan position for...

4 hours ago by whs001 on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Moley

@ewallace. Not so clear. Anyone can obtain the text, for example from here http://www.ustr.gov/webfm_send/2379. I support ACTA so long as it and...

4 hours ago by Moley on ACTA: Facts, misconceptions and questions
45283

I think WinRT is fantastic. I just wish it was an option for people that didn't want to go through Microsoft's App Store with its attendant...

7 hours ago by 45283 on Why Windows 8 needs architectural hygiene for WOA
Burn-IT

Nine people? £30m? Who's back pocket is that lot going in? And IF they say it is for new buildings, what about all the ones the government has...

8 hours ago by Burn-IT on Police set to launch three £30m e-crime hubs
ewallace

Just to be clear, nobody knows what is in the text of ACTA, here is a photograph of the text of ACTA http://twitpic.com/8h9iju as submitted to the...

8 hours ago by ewallace on ACTA: Facts, misconceptions and questions
fgvrg56

Unfortunately main issue is that ASUS is refusing to accept that they make some mistake on this version of asus Transformer prime. 1 - GPS sensor...

10 hours ago by fgvrg56 on Asus Eee Pad Transformer Prime Wi-Fi & GPS problems?
Ben Woods

@Marcus A fair question. Just talked with Archos which said it was working on an announcement for next week....

11 hours ago by Ben Woods on Archos confirms G9 Ice Cream Sandwich update schedule
Marcus Karlsson

Any update on this, considering the claimed "first week of February"?

12 hours ago by Marcus Karlsson via Facebook on Archos confirms G9 Ice Cream Sandwich update schedule
apexwm

Bill Goodrich : Just as al_langevin pointed out, with Windows Server 2008 there is no Services for Macintosh anymore. It's gone, not available....

20 hours ago by apexwm on Windows Server 2008 drops the ball for Mac compatibility
txtrainguy

Replying to an old topic that I'm currently facing with my CEO (who is on a Mac). Our servers are primarily Windows Servers, office is about...

1 day ago by txtrainguy on Windows Server 2008 drops the ball for Mac compatibility
k0tcs3

Sure, that makes perfect sense. Pay wrong-doers money and thank them for breaching your security and pointing out your flaws, that would surely...

1 day ago by k0tcs3 on US indicts Romanian over NASA climate change hack
Random_Error

I think he's referring specifically to Android apps, as Apple do regulate their App Store, but Google seem to let any old crap onto the Android store!

1 day ago by Random_Error on RIM: BlackBerry will keep 'garbage' apps out of store