In a report published by Clean Production Action and the Computer TakeBack Campaign, two groups studying environmental and health issues related to computers, researchers contend that potentially dangerous elements of brominated fire retardants are turning up in dust samples from computers. The research indicates that the most commonly found example of these substances, widely used fire prevention compounds known as polybrominated diphenyl ethers, or PBDEs, have been found to cause health problems in lab animals.
Perhaps of greater concern is the report's contention that PBDEs, which have been shown to present reproductive and neurological risks to animals used in lab tests, remain persistent in the environment and contaminate food supplies, animals and humans. The researchers claim that the PBDE threat is greatest in North America, where women were found to have the highest levels of the chemicals present in their breast milk, and that PBDE levels are doubling in the US population every two to five years.
It's important to note that PBDEs are not only found in computers; the flame retardants are also commonly used in other electronics, including televisions, radios, and other standard household devices. In addition, while the substances have been linked to health issues in animals, there has been no definitive research proving their danger to humans.
The PBDE report arrives at a time when PC companies have been increasing efforts aimed at recycling old computing gear. Though the potentially toxic elements have been found at comparable levels in similar tests of other consumer electronics, and though it is recognised that devices such as cathode-ray tube televisions may pose even greater risks to the environment, the researchers said they targeted computers because of the rapid build-up of PCs in US landfills.
Limited recycling thus far
Even though Dell, Hewlett-Packard and IBM -- the world's three largest PC manufacturers, collectively shipping about 60 million units in 2003, according to IDC -- all offer PC recycling programs, the number of PCs they recycle is still relatively low, analysts say. And there's a growing backlog to contend with: The Environmental Protection Agency, for one, has estimated that the number of computers thrown out over the five years between 2002 and 2007 will reach 250 million.
PC market leader Dell, which shipped nearly 26 million computers in 2003, said last year that out of all the machines it has delivered since establishing its first recycling program 12 years ago, only 2 million PCs have been recycled. Last month, Dell announced plans to increase the amount of materials it collects by 50 percent, by weight, during fiscal 2005. Dell said that during its fiscal 2004, which ended on 30 January, it collected 35 million pounds of computer gear for recycling.
Company officials were quick to point out that Dell has prohibited the use of PBDEs in any of its products since 2002, and they said that the PC maker has worked closely with groups such as the Silicon Valley Toxics Coalition, a backer of the report, to help promote increased computer recycling. Bryant Hilton, a spokesman for Dell, said the company's goal is to make recycling programs more affordable and accessible to consumers.
"We agree that disposal is part of the life cycle responsibility we share with customers," said Hilton. "Dell has been active in efforts to set higher goals and take these substances out of our products, after disposal and before they ever reach consumers."
The study of PBDEs was based on 16 samples of dust collected by the Computer TakeBack Campaign and Clean Production Action from computer monitors in public locations across eight states, including university computer labs, legislative offices and a children's museum. The groups believe that the United States lags behind Europe in making efforts to reduce human exposure to the toxic substances, as the European Union has already called for all PBDEs used in consumer electronics to be phased out by 2006.
Pushing for change
Representatives for the Computer TakeBack Campaign, a coalition of organisations advocating for computer and electronics manufacturers to assume a greater role in recycling their own products, said that targeting PC makers before going after other device producers was a "no-brainer."
"Computers are the fastest growing environmental threat in terms of volume and represent the greatest burden on municipal disposal budgets and landfills," said Kara Reeve, a campaign manager at the Clean Water Fund, another organisation pushing for computer recycling. "The manufacturers keep shipping out products, but local governments get stuck with the problem, and the cleanup bill."
Reeve pointed out that computer manufacturers have been required to meet more stringent recycling standards for years in some European countries, such as Germany, where PC makers have been held responsible for disposal of unwanted hardware and device packaging since the mid-90s. She said the long-term goal of groups like hers is to encourage computer makers to continually review and improve their new product designs to eliminate potentially hazardous materials.






Talkback
I am very concerned by your story - I handle at my non-profit recycling center 166 tons a year and am I exposing my volunteers and myself to the nasties.
As an environmentalist, here in the UK things are tough, especially when your talking about recycling. Although I would like to point out that these dangerous chemicals extend further than the pc to all manner of mainstream products from kitchen cleaners to the chemically treated food you eat.
Its a gradual process but I can only say that awareness of this is the best weapon against it, companies will not stop using the chemicals unless demands by customers are made so extra effort should be made to seek out the most environmentally friendly product, this will force companies to change their practices.
This report doesn't make it clear where the dust comes from.
Having opened-up many PCs I can't see that the quantities of dust found there are created by the PC itself. It is much more likely that it consists of fabric fibres from such things as carpets, curtains, clothing and furniture coverings, plus the usual human skin fragments and spider webs. If this is the case then we are all breathing-in this stuff everyday as we wander round our own homes and workplaces. I find this much more worrying than what might be inside my PC case.
This is very disturbing to me as I run a PC Repair business and often clean clients computers of dust.
After reading this article, I shall be sure to wear a mask while carrying out these procedures.