In a recent interview, Red Hat's chief executive Matthew Szulik was questioned on whether his company owes a certain amount of its success to a wave of anti-American feeling exacerbated by the US invasion of Iraq.
Although Szulik deftly side-stepped the question, citing "choice" and "flexibility" as more important motivators, the anti-Americanism card is certainly a factor when it comes to the rise and rise of Linux. While its aggressively capitalist behaviour inextricably marks Microsoft as an American business icon, Red Hat and other open-source firms are freed from similar national associations by their mantra of freedom and altruism. Having a Finnish poster-boy inventor doesn't hurt.
The alleged financial savings from open source have certainly played a significant part in the adoption of Linux by European and Asian governments but Microsoft's Americanism can't be ignored. Monopolistic practices aside, Gates et al haven't done much to impress foreign governments of their international credentials. Speaking at the International Geographical Union congress in Glasgow yesterday, Tom Edwards, Microsoft's top man in its Geopolitical Product Strategy team, confessed to a litany of cultural gaffs that have cost the software giant literally millions of dollars over the years.
One gem occurred when Microsoft designers were colouring in 800,000 pixels on a map of India, and filled eight of them a different shade of green to represent the disputed Kashmiri territory. The difference in greens meant Kashmir was shown as non-Indian and the product was promptly banned in India. Redmond was left to recall all 200,000 copies of the offending Windows 95 software to try and heal the diplomatic wounds. Another gaff saw the Spanish language version of Windows XP, destined for Latin American markets, give users an option to select their gender from not specified, male or "bitch", due to an unfortunate error in translation.
While these foul-ups might appear amusing and inconsequential, they smack of the US isolationism typified by George Bush's down-home folksiness that sits well with home-voters but has left a sour taste in the mouths of the international community. With local software markets saturated, foreign opportunities are vital to Microsoft's continued growth. China's IT sector remains one of the world's bright spots, growing by 20 percent a year. Software sales should hit $30.5bn by 2005, according to IDC. If Microsoft wants a decent slice of this pie, they are going to have to work harder at uncoupling from their US roots or pray hard for a change of administration in November.





Talkback
Man, I hate europeans. And I don't even LIKE microcrap products.
See ya...
I must say this is pretty unbelievabe. Someone is afraid that a foreign preference for non-Microsoft software has to with anti-Americanism. Next thing they: asking an American (though a Microsoft competitor) whether this is true.
The most common reasons for anyone (not just non-US buyers) deciding not to use Microsoft products (either OS or application software) are the folowing:
- prohibitive pricing by Microsoft (an 85% profit margin on a product that already payed itself a 100 times over, if not even more)
- technical inferiority (including opennes to viruses, spyware, spamming and such) of Microsoft products
- predatory and by times even criminal behavior by Microsoft in trying to maintain and enhance their current monopolies, an trying to establish new monoplies.
What the h*ll has Iraq got to do with that. I LIKE America (though not it's current president) and my economic decisions are self-explanatory. Hey, I buy Apple, don't I?
The example in the article (India-Kashmir) is in the same category as the protests when Microsoft gave an image in their Office stock image library portraying a young black kid playing "monkey" (the kid was playing on a monkey bar). India bought 200.000 copies of the next version of the application where the Kashmir image was changed.
Summarizing: the decision not to buy Microsoft stuff has nothing to do with anti-Americanism
Is this a story about Linux or just a political editorial? I belive it is the latter and I don't appreciate it on ZDNet. Save the political hot air for Newsweek or some other publication and just report the tech news. This isn't so much a comparison of MS vs. Linux as a cheap political swipe at the Republican party. Go Fish!
Good riddance to Microsoft. My hatred and disgust with Windows has pushed me to go to Linux. I'm so sick of crappy vendors and crappy un-tested software, apathetic tech support. I just had to buy a new modem and nothing worked under XP. US Robotics hasn't bothered to update their modem bios in three years. Truly a nightmare. So, up with Linux! And I don't hate Europeans.
Are you running an anti-bush ad or a technical artcle?
What’s all this innocence, it’s obvious that politics affects everything - even software and its company. I am from the UK and support MS. I am a follower of their technology as they are penetrating new markets; one is voice recognition in cars. The promotional adverts they used on the windows mobile section of the MS website show that indeed MS is still apple pie, and this type of ad does not appeal to other countries - it’s clearly shit.
Yea their sales are effected by political issues, especially where governments are involved, where’s the coincidence that London council accepted.
Samuel
Nothing to add to the answer from kees beerpot.
I am effraid when I read article like that.
If i want since 5 or 6 years to live M$ product it is because i want to HAVE CHOICE and keep FREE to use tecnical products with high performances, inovations and COMPATIBILITY
LIBERTE is a french word since 1789
Samuel: Don't even mention the idea of putting Microsoft in cars. That's something I would be really really scared of.
Can we pass a law that cars containing MS software have to use different roads to the rest of us?
Try http://www.xciv.org/~meta/Technology/Microsoft/, about halfway down if you wish to learn more about attempts to put MS in cars.