"Internally, we call it 1-2-6: one watt for the processor, two for the chipset and six for the rest of the system. If you want to get to eight hours, we recommend integrated graphics in chipsets," Trainor said. "We can demonstrate lab-built batteries that can do 72 watt hours and we believe one or more companies will be in production in reasonable volumes (toward 2008)."
Easy on the accelerator
Other elements of a notebook also make a difference. For the last several years, component makers steadily increased energy efficiency in many parts. LCD manufacturers, for instance, started to sell panels that consumed only 3 watts of power on average, a substantial improvement. LCD panels typically account for about 30 percent of overall notebook power consumption.
Another recent improvement for screens comes in the form of Intel's Display Power Saving Technology. With it, the pixels in a digital picture or graphic image are wider than normal, which lets more light out. In ordinary circumstances, the added light would wash out the picture, but the chipset also turns down the light source inside the panel. In the end, the image looks the same, but overall power consumption eases back from 4.8 watts to 3.2 watts. (The technology in part derives from Taiwan's Toppoly, in which Intel Capital has made an investment.)
On the other hand, screens that use OLED, or organic light-emitting diode, technology may take a while to reach notebooks. Mobile phone manufacturers already use them. However, mobile phone screens are mostly dark -- only the numbers light up -- while notebook screens are generally fully lit. OLEDs, therefore, may not provide power consumption advantages, Trainor theorised.
The hard drive, which on average consumes about 8 percent of a notebook's overall power, will also see improvements. At Microsoft's WinHEC gathering earlier this spring, Samsung showed off a hard drive in which most data gets stored to flash memory first. With the addition of flash, the hard drive can hibernate most of the time, and thereby extend battery life of a notebook by a half hour or more, according to Samsung.
Intel's upcoming Yonah notebook chip, due in the first quarter of 2006, will also consume less power than current Pentium M processors, Eden said. In addition, chipsets will begin to include more energy efficiency technology. Chipsets typically cost far less than processors and the same degree of energy conservation has not been applied to them.
Competitor Via Technologies also recently came out with a power-efficient notebook chip, the C7.
Despite the changes, consumers aren't likely to see radical shifts in notebook design. Enthusiasm for fuel cells, for instance, appears to be waning.
Fuel cells are bulky, Trainor said, and more time and money will be required to shrink them. Energy efficiency will also have to be improved. In addition, fuel cell refills cost money, in contrast with the seemingly no-cost charging of a lithium ion battery via a wall socket.
"It may be the next decade," Trainor said," before we see fuel cells inside the battery cavity."
Talkback
I've never had a laptop before and wasn't aware of the battery life -- is that it! not much in my opinion.
And what about Japanese workers, are they 9-5?
I think that there should be a standard sign/logo that all manufacturers of laptop components should use which shows how much power consumption the device uses.
This would be a new way for laptop owners to guage how power hungry a new device could be and tip the balance just like price and power might.
Japanese notebooks are going far beyond. For example, Panasonic "Let's Note T4"(CF-T4G) can run 12 hours without any extra battery pack, by using Intel Pentium M at 1.20 GHz and 12.1 inch XGA LCD.