Even the world's richest man craves better home-entertainment gear.
Bill Gates says his house is already wired to the hilt, with touch screens and high-definition displays. But, in the second installment of a two-part interview, the Microsoft chairman admits he's ready to revamp his system to add "some vision and speech-type things".
What catches his eye at this year's Consumer Electronics Show (CES)? Gates says he's impressed by the number of high-quality, low-cost digital displays and the continuing spread of wireless technology.
As Windows Vista's debut looms, Gates takes measure of Windows XP's legacy to computing. And as he enters his final year full-time at Microsoft, he talks about his foundation and the work he'll be doing there.
Q: Every year at CES we see an array of futuristic PCs, and yet the types of computers that most people buy tend to be the same old desktops and notebooks. Do you think that's really going to start to change, and why?
A: Vista enables new capabilities. We didn't have the touch; we didn't have Media Center ready for the mainstream; we didn't have the SideShow, these smaller form factors. The hardware is improving a lot now, so you can get all the way down to a six-inch display to let you read and get your full capabilities there. I do think we're seeing an expansion, and Vista is a big enabler.
What will be the biggest change that Vista will bring to everyday computing?
For me, the search function has made a big difference. It's built in; applications call those APIs. The visual experience [is] just a lot better for me than what I had before, so my machine that didn't have Vista... I felt bad when I used it.
When you look back at Windows XP, what do you think is the biggest change in computing that XP brought?
XP was part of this explosion of the Windows PC to the centre of a lot of experiences. Before XP came along, portables were a very small percentage of what people did, so as we put the wireless capability in there, the standard stack in there, we did some things that let Wi-Fi really take off in a big way, which let portable computers take off.
We did much better power management in XP than we'd ever done before. So could we have had this portable explosion? No, we couldn't have.
Vista takes that to the next degree because portables are growing, and that's even before you get to some of the more breakthrough things like Tablet or the small ultramobile type form factor. So we can look back on every Windows release and say it ushered in something new. Here, you could say it ushers in 64-bit.
But certainly at the server level... people are starting to push the limits, so if you don't relieve that memory pressure, people start to do very complex things like they did when we pushed the original 8086 limits, and now we've completely avoided that.
So there's quite a list you could pick. A lot of them have to do with new scenarios that were never being done before. RSS in the platform &mdsh; at the time of XP, nobody knew what that was, why that was a big deal. Now I sit in IE and I mark things, and they just show up in Outlook. I take that for granted.
What types of things do you bring in via RSS?
I sign up to the kind of blogs that you might expect. I sign up to a lot of SharePoint sites that now can generate RSS notifications, so I'll be able to look and see, do I want to go and visit that? A lot of internal Microsoft sites where they're changing plans or schedules that I — I'm not going to pull them all, but I want a sense that I can do that.
I use my inbox rules to put these different things in folders and then, depending on what context I'm in, I'll go in one of those folders, just hit the urgent things, or go and hit some of the additional things. It saves me a lot of time. I see way more than I would otherwise.
The digital home is one of the big topics here this year. Since you have access to, I would imagine, any technology you want, I'm curious: what kinds of things do you have in your digital house that you think the average person will have in the coming years?
I can call up any movie, anywhere in the house. I can call up any of the music, and it's all just one totally integrated system. I have touch screens around. I have great high-definition screens. That system was actually done some time ago, so within the next couple of years, I'm going to take Media Center and rebuild it and take on another level of ambition.
I think I'll start to use some vision and speech-type things that would have been too advanced when I did the version that I have right now, so I want to get out there on the bleeding edge again.
Revamping the living room is one of the projects coming up for you?
Well, actually, I'll get other people to do the work, but what I did in my home helped drive some of those Media Center scenarios. Now I want to try and experiment with what the next frontier should be for those, and as screens become pervasive, as natural input becomes more practical, there's a lot more you can do. I'll show in my keynote tonight this idea of pervasive screens in the kitchen, in the bedroom, where the wall itself, in terms of the theme of the room or even picking what you're going to wear, seeing what's going on — as those screens are everywhere as you can talk and use cameras, it's really a lot different from a classic PC experience.
Outside of what Microsoft's doing, what types of things that we're going to see at CES or in consumer electronics, what's the biggest thing that's not involved with Microsoft that you think is making the biggest impact?
I think everything here does fit under these themes of connected and high fidelity.
You know, every year we see big, amazing LCD screens. Obviously, [there are] big price drops this year, big volume increases, so we'll see that. Taking care of the lack of certain colour capabilities, these new backlights…






Talkback
I saw some of the CE show demos and was gobsmacked by the idea anyone would allow MS Windows to run a house?
Don't they have health and Saftey Executive in the US?
MS have not the first idea of resilient integrated systems, their OS can barely hang together for a decent session on a simple PC and is not even closely integrated with the many available PC peripheral device drivers - think fire extinguishers or intruder protection systems for a house - and it takes a technology geek to fix anything beyond a reboot, pick crashed apps from the teeth of its DOS throwback registry, etc. Been there , done that.
Run away! Run away!
There was once a good gag about what people would expect if they bought a car from Microsoft and it regularly stopped functioning without warning and required various unnatural acts to get working and keep running. Its coming true in the mind of his Billness! Do not be hypnotised and swallowed up by the evil empire. Resistance is possible. WAKE UP!
Anyone really want to trust the operation of their house to a Microsoft OS? Maybe a Mac or Linux, Mac if you want to minimise user expert knowledge and actual service interuptions.
But really this should not even be a PC architecture market. Its far too life threatening. You need to step right out of loosely integrated modular PC architectures - to MIL standard embedded processors with tight, non proprietary designs so they are required by law to work with all connected peripheral devices and run bomb proof "House Management" code the user doesn't have to maintain - and will run indefinitely without a upgrade on what is a closed and industry standard consumer unit for 20 or 30 years with the only upgrades to BIOS/firmware. Not an MS way of working.
Imagine:
"Microsoft VIstahome version 8.3.2 Release 4 has encountered a critical software error and must be rebooted. The sprinkler system has been activated. Please evacuate the property, close all active programs, cooking , heating, lighting and life support systems then reboot".
"We're sorry, you need to upgrade to House 7.3 before you can enter the property again, please authorise payment of $1,000 to Microsoft to gain entry".
etc.
.... I don't think so. This needs closed integrated industry standard devices from people who understand what real consumer utility products are, as in Honeywell Controls et al. Or motor vehicle electronics makers - who are not quite there yet either but a lot closer than MS.
Not flaky Gates' MS who demonstrably wouldn't know how to build an integrated resilient and fault tolerant system to save their lives, and have always swamped emerging CPU power with crap overweight code and pointless cunningly concealed and unuseable-by-the-rest-of-us "features" for techno "don't you know that" geeks with no lives - instead of making PCs work faster and the core features more accessible to ordinary people who live in houses instead of sleeping in their clothes under their coding stations. Would you want their idea of a user interface running your property?
With a REAL integrated approach to PCs Woz and Steve had an integrated intuitive GUI OS running on 1985 Motorola 68000 CPU technology, it took MS another 10 years - and then MS started with the licensed Mac OS for Windows 2.0 and 3.0.
Since then Jobs did Pixar, iMac and iPod. Microsoft did some more cumbersome and slower OS and Office Apps, the ignored tablet PC and played "catch up and kill the innovators" on the Internet. With smart handelds they are still forcing cool and unwanted technology on real users instead of targetting needs, as Sony , a real market led company, has.
I rest my case.
My motion is this house will never run under a Microsoft OS.
Don't let yours if you value your investment.
Brian Catt
Think i will agree with you on this as the idea of a gates controlled house is a tad scary.