Top five PC manufacturers fail naked PC test

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

NEWS

IT professionals are being forced to adopt Microsoft's operating systems — even if they tell their PC supplier they want a system free of Microsoft software, ZDNet UK's research has revealed.

ZDNet's reporters posed as undercover buyers to identify the policy of the top-five PC vendors in terms of supplying systems without an operating system, known as naked PCs. A naked PC gives IT professionals freedom to install the operating system of their choice.

But the ZDNet investigation showed that none of the five manufacturers would sell any PCs without Windows, our reporters found.

The reasons — or excuses — were varied.

Acer said it would give our reporter a refund of £30 for not using Windows, but would only make a refund if we drove to its Plymouth "repair" centre. In contrast to other reports, Dell refused to refund the Windows software if it went unused. Instead it offered to cancel the shipping charge of £50 as a compromise.

We backed up our undercover enquiries with official calls to every one of the five vendors. Two of the five — Acer and Toshiba — would not discuss the matter with us. Dell, HP and Lenovo claimed it was possible to buy naked PCs from their company — but our attempts to follow their guidance to buy one proved impossible.

Dell and HP both claimed it was possible to buy a naked PC from them, but we were unable to buy one from either vendor. Lenovo told us it sells PCs with pre-installed Linux, but it could not tell us how we could buy such a system.

Microsoft has placed considerable pressure on a number of PC vendors not to sell systems without Windows. Critics have suggested that vendors have yielded to such pressure because they are afraid of losing their bulk purchasing discount with Microsoft. Others have suggested that it would cost PC vendors considerably more in unit costs to produce naked PCs.

Ranjit Atwal, Gartner principal analyst, is pessimistic about the future for naked PCs. "The market for Linux is probably not big enough for them [suppliers] to go down that route," said Atwal, adding that he thought the number of users wanting to use Linux at the desktop was "in the small single digits".

"To do that [provide systems without Windows] costs them money," he argued.

Yet many customers have demanded naked PCs. A user forum set up in February by Dell has been inundated with such requests.

Read this

Swiss user wins Vista refund

Dell Germany seems to be cottoning on to naked PCs, Richard Thurston writes.

Read blog +

While customers find it difficult to get naked PCs, some of the vendors are beginning to apply more thought to loading Linux on PCs for both high-street buyers and corporates. HP is one such company. It recently began a feasibility study that tested the public's appetite for the operating system.

"We carried out a test marketing exercise and made Linux PCs available to users," explained Peter Murray, director of enterprise server and storage at HP. "It was disappointing and we had very little interest. We looked at the exercise and we think we may have got the marketing wrong so we are trying it again."

Murray believes there is a market for Linux in the UK but is also aware of the issues facing any large supplier who wants to make Linux boxes available. "It means diverting production lines and that is a lot of money and so we have to prove the business case," he said. However, he made it clear that he is enthusiastic about the idea and wants to make it work. "We just have to show it is worthwhile," he said.

Dell's position is less clear. The company has said it is keen to promote Linux and systems ready to run with Red Hat Linux are available on its site, but only in the US. While Linux is not available to UK users, Dell is currently assessing user interest on its own site and is asking for input from potential Dell/Linux users.

We have used the latest figures on PC sales from Gartner to identify the top five vendors. We detail our findings one vendor at a time over the following five pages.

Additional reporting by Colin Barker of ZDNet UK.

Talkback

Nice to see this subject being aired. But even if you want an MS OS they invariably bundle it with all sorts of rubbish that runs on startup, just look at he systray! You are better off installing it yourself!

adyj 16 March, 2007 15:12
Reply

In the past I have ordered pc's with no OS from Dell. It took a little persistence but eventually by threatening to take my order else where they buckled. This was an order for about 30 Optiplex desktops. The reason why I wanted they PC without Windows was the company I worked for had an enterprise agreement with Microsoft so we did not want Windows XP Pro OEM on there.

If there's a reasonable amount of money on the table you might be surprised what a sales person is willing to do.

bigfootman 16 March, 2007 15:36
Reply

The Linux Emporium in the UK (www.linuxemporium.co.uk) sell a wide range of IBM/Lenovo laptops, preinstalled with Ubuntu.

bLanark 16 March, 2007 22:12
Reply

You can also buy one with Linux pre-installed.

http://lxer.com/module/forums/t/23168/

http://lxer.com/module/db/index.php?dbn=14

cyber_rigger 16 March, 2007 23:00
Reply

Here is the link for a naked pc.
http://www.dell.com/content/products/features.aspx/nseries?c=us&cs=04&l=en&s=bsd&redirect=1

cdtech 16 March, 2007 23:12
Reply

http://lxer.com/module/forums/t/23168/
http://lxer.com/module/db/index.php?dbn=14

cyber_rigger 16 March, 2007 23:49
Reply

This post has been removed by a moderator.

Hi anyone interested in naked PC's or with Linux from Fujitsu Siemens can contact us @ emaack.com

emaack 17 March, 2007 00:06
Reply

This article sites 'production line diversions' as being a main reason manufacturers wouldn't want to sell a 'naked pc'. This sounds like a fancy way of saying they are giving in to pressure from Microsoft. Honestly though, how could it possibly cost them extra money to *remove* a step in their system-building pipeline (installing the OS)? I built my last 2 PCs myself and I'll tell you that if I didn't bother to install the OS, I would have been done a lot quicker and if I was getting paid per hour to do this for someone, I would certainly charge them less too. I'm rather confused.

bleedseason 17 March, 2007 04:49
Reply

Dell does ship systems with linux as well as systems with nothing installed.
Nothing installed
http://www.dell.com/content/products/features.aspx/nseries?c=us&cs=04&l=en&s=bsd&redirect=1
Linux Preinstalled
http://www.dell.com/content/products/features.aspx/precn_n?c=us&cs=04&l=en&s=bsd

blchoat 17 March, 2007 05:59
Reply

Some choose to pass on the spiff as a rebate. The OS is a piece part to them and they have it factored into their cost, so when they say it costs them more, it could, but it would just be the cost of the rebate process and the amount they make on the OS as a piece part.

gdoan 17 March, 2007 08:52
Reply

I've been buying low power usage VIA motherboards from Mini-Itx and they are easy about not shipping Windows with their parts. On the other hand, I actually have to build these things. However, its worth it to get 1,500 Bogus Mips in a 20 watt box 1/10th the volume of a normal pizza box.

45758 17 March, 2007 21:27
Reply

This post has been removed by a moderator.

The story clearly says that Dell do sell Linux desktops but only in the US. Your link is to Dell US. So what's your point?

1000025291 18 March, 2007 15:02
Reply

Richard's story clearly says that Dell sells Linux boxes in the US, your links are to Dell.com ie. Dell US. So what's your point?

1000025291 18 March, 2007 15:06
Reply

The emaack.com website has no links anywhere leading to Linux-pre-installed PC offerings. If I enter the simple search term 'Linux PC' in its search box it again leads to nowhere.

If somebody wants to offer Linux PCs they should clearly say so on their website and not hide it!

JNeuhoff 18 March, 2007 19:25
Reply

http://lxer.com/module/forums/t/23168/
http://lxer.com/module/db/index.php?dbn=14

cyber_rigger 19 March, 2007 05:38
Reply

Thank you for your link. Amon others, the http://lxer.com/module/forums/t/23168/ lists Systemax.com which uses misco.co.uk as a PC distributor. Now, if I search on Misco for e.g. 'Linspire', it then at first delivers some results. However, as soon as I click on the results, it leads to Windows Vista PCs!

Hence, it doesn't seem to be true when lxer.com makes the following claim:

"The company doesn't count if they advertise Linux, then spam you with MS Windows."

because I am being spammed with MS Windows offerings.

JNeuhoff 19 March, 2007 21:59
Reply

If manufacturers state that they hardly ever sell systems without pre-installed Windows then doesn't that mean that large organizations (including those that are fueled by tax money) have made paying double part of their company policy?

Meaning, that, given the volume purchased, it is possible to purchase customized configurations. That includes almost anything you want, or not want. So why hasn't anyone come up with the idea to purchase systems without pre-installed Windows? Why waste a default price cut? Because chances are high that the moment the systems are delivered they'll get re-installed with some company image backed up by an Enterprise license. Who needs an OEM license then? Heck, you can even get them pre-installed with your own company image.

Normally that should mean that the statistics of the manufacturers should show that a large enough percentage of systems in purchased without a pre-installed Windows (the OEM version). Given that most large suppliers have a short list of preferred suppliers that usually includes the Top 5 directly or indirectly. But because manufacturers say that the purchase of naked PC's doesn;t even register that can only mean that plenty of budget has been burned on unused OEM licenses. Or the statistics don't add up. Or prices are artificial.

Think about this for a while. Estimate the number of systems purchased in large volumes over the years and imagine what kind of impact that might have had on tax money saved and/or jobs saved.
It does add up.

Either manufacturer statistics only show their best interest and clearly no longer can be trusted or a lot of large organizations should have a serious talk with whomever negotiates their purchases. Perhaps ask their money back or change preferred supplier.

In short, it most likely boils down to a self fulfilling prophecy most simply take for granted. And thus pay the price for it.

Arthur B. 20 March, 2007 23:34
Reply

This post has been removed by a moderator.

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

SPM

The 2 million number quoted is shipments not sales, an exact repeat of last year's dire sales of WP7. Sales to customers are likely to number only...

4 hours ago by SPM on Nokia earnings fail to shine despite Lumia
apexwm

It sounds like this is just another variable in the complex equation of Microsoft licensing, which often results in customers overpaying as it is....

5 hours ago by apexwm on UK customers to lose out in Microsoft licensing change
chonzchor

I am really thankful to you for this nice and beautiful information.I really like this. cable ties

6 hours ago by chonzchor on Currys £16.99 USB cable rip-off.
Brian Jones

What would be nice would be if Microsoft practiced consistent pricing between the US and Europe.

11 hours ago by Brian Jones via Facebook on UK customers to lose out in Microsoft licensing change
Karen Friar

@Scott Deagan: Ofcom dedicated a section to upload speeds - see page 19 onward of its full report:...

11 hours ago by Karen Friar on UK broadband speed climbs 22 percent
EUDataProtection

The EU proposals can all be read in full on the reform website: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/data-protection/minisite/index.html

13 hours ago by EUDataProtection on Firms face tough new EU fines for data breaches
Jake Rayson

Found out that Taskwarrior stores all data in plain text files: "Task writes all pending tasks to the file ~/.task/pending.data and all completed...

15 hours ago by Jake Rayson on Taskwarrior: command line task manager
ians1

"...based 6,000 miles away..." Indeed, so who do you complain to when things go wrong? I would not buy shares in Faecebook even if I could...

15 hours ago by ians1 on Facebook plans to raise $5bn via share launch
servermanagement

These are really very useful tips of backing up the system. Each tips are important and essential to prevent loosing all the data that we have....

17 hours ago by servermanagement on Ten ways to take the sting out of IT disasters
Scott Deagan

Why is the upstream never discussed? I'd like to see Ofcom explain to Internet users why people in the UK can only get a maximum of 10Mb/s upstream...

1 day ago by Scott Deagan via Facebook on UK broadband speed climbs 22 percent
Moley

Seemingly a very strange decision, even perverse. Mind you, the basis of the decision is hardly explained here or in Cnet. Perhaps we will hear...

1 day ago by Moley on Free Maps costs Google £400K in damages in France
Jake Rayson

@OccupyACAT: I had heard mention of the Emacs extension but not the Ubiquity project. Interesting to see an idea spread almost simultaneously! Re....

1 day ago by Jake Rayson on Ubuntu HUD Intenterface? Sublime already there!
markhumphryes

With no Flash support on LoveFilm, mobile devices running Android will not be able to use it - I presume - I tried a trial via my Galaxy Tab 10.1...

2 days ago by markhumphryes on Lovefilm drops Flash, kills Linux support
manek

And people wonder why there is caution about doing business with large, consumer-focused technology companies, most of which are based 6,000 miles...

2 days ago by manek on Facebook plans to raise $5bn via share launch
manek

Yes, frameworks and smarter compilers - but I suspect a lot of the code will have to be written with parallel processing as one of its fundamental...

2 days ago by manek on Parallel computing takes a step forward
Simon Bisson and Mary Branscombe

Well, this is why I'm both fascinated and slightly worried; parallel computing and concurrency and complex architectures don't seem to be something...

2 days ago by Simon Bisson and Mary Branscombe on Parallel computing takes a step forward
ians1

Let's hope that they take more notice of their shareholders than they do of their poor customers! I have never experienced customer service as bad...

2 days ago by ians1 on Facebook plans to raise $5bn via share launch
servermanagement

Thanks for the heads up. Will definitely check this HUD Intenterface.

2 days ago by servermanagement on Linux Minterface
Will A

Some more observations by an extremely frustrated user in Canada (apparently every country has a different set of "issues"): The web interfaces...

2 days ago by Will A on Cambridge researchers knock Verified by Visa
Jake Rayson

@zdnetukuser: I hope there's more conciliation and less bitterness in the graphical shell camps, I'd like to Ubuntu to succeed, I *want* to have a...

2 days ago by Jake Rayson on Linux Minterface