With Windows 7, Microsoft has done the technical work to make the operating system work on netbooks, but the low-cost laptops still pose a challenge to the way the software maker does business.
As the only fast-growing part of an otherwise sluggish PC market, netbooks are clearly a product category that Microsoft cannot afford to ignore. At the same time, computers selling for only a couple of hundred dollars do not give Microsoft the opportunity to get the kinds of revenue for each copy of Windows that it is used to receiving.
Microsoft is hoping Windows 7 provides an opportunity to move netbooks up the food chain, with the distinction between such devices and traditional laptops eventually going away entirely.
"Our position is that netbooks are small notebook PCs," said Don Paterson, a director in Microsoft's Windows unit. "The distinction that has existed around netbooks is, to some extent, a creation of the industry's mind."
Although it will offer a low-cost version of Windows 7 — Windows 7 Starter — to compete with Linux to power the cheapest of netbooks, Microsoft is ultimately hoping consumers and PC makers will pay more to get the 'home premium' version of Windows Vista, which supports things such as a touchscreen or the Media Center interface.
"We're pretty squarely focused on thinking the sweet spot moving forward on netbooks is going to be home premium," Paterson said. "We are going to try [to] rally the industry around that vision."
Key question
But analysts say that could be a tough proposition. The key question is whether consumers really want more bang from their netbooks, or if they just want to spend as little as possible on a machine that can do the basics of web browsing and email.
Michael Cherry, an analyst with Directions on Microsoft, thinks netbooks are fundamentally about the latter.
"I think its a computer that is about price," Cherry said. "I don't think it is a computer that is about features."
That Microsoft is even in the game technically represents something of a reversal of fortunes. Microsoft has been playing catch-up since the market took off with the introduction of Asus's Eee PC in 2007. Many of those first machines ran Linux, representing the open-source operating system's first big shot at powering the mainstream desktop.
At the time, Microsoft was moving from Windows XP to the far more demanding Windows Vista, whose memory and storage needs were ill-suited to the low-end netbook. As a result, Microsoft kept around the ageing XP to compete against Linux on netbooks.
When it came time to build Windows 7, Microsoft focused on creating a product that can run on the kinds of hardware being used in today's netbooks. Ultimately, Microsoft says that all of its versions of Windows 7 should be able to run comfortably on a standard netbook configuration with 1GB of memory and a 1GHz processor.
Now, Microsoft would like to see what it can do in terms of making some money off the machines. At the low-end, Microsoft is bringing over Starter Edition, a severely limited version of Windows that has historically been sold only in emerging markets. Machines running Starter, for example, can run only three applications at any one time.
Netbooks of the future
Microsoft is aiming to make the netbook market more like the traditional PC market, with Home Premium being the standard option. Paterson said Microsoft thinks netbooks can evolve to handle more media-playing capabilities, the kinds of things that require Windows Home Premium.
Cherry, though, thinks what consumers really want is the cheapest-possible PC. And just the fact Microsoft can get its highest-end versions of Windows 7 running on a netbook does not guarantee a market.
"Although Microsoft can get it to run on netbooks," Cherry said, "the economics on the bill of materials probably limits what Microsoft can make on each one".
But Sandeep Aggarwal, an analyst with brokerage firm Collins Stewart, thinks many people are underestimating Windows 7's netbook opportunity. In a research note this month, Aggarwal said Microsoft stands to make as much as $680m (£480m) more next year on notebooks by having a range of products that can run on the machines.
Before Windows 7, Aggarwal estimates that Microsoft was getting $23 for each copy of Windows XP that sold onto a netbook. With Windows 7, Aggarwal said he is estimating revenue as high as $58 per unit for home premium, with Windows 7 Starter fetching around $25. Aggarwal figures that four-fifths of netbooks in mature markets will ship with the pricier version, compared to just 20 percent running Starter Edition.
In emerging markets, Microsoft will also have a Home Basic option that Aggarwal thinks will account for the bulk of sales. However, Aggarwal is assuming Microsoft will get $17 more for each copy of Windows 7 Home Basic than it did for netbook sales of Windows XP.
Paterson said that adding more features ultimately means consumers get a better experience and helps computer makers avoid competing solely on who can offer the lowest price.
"What's the industry's advantage in saying lets drive this thing to rock bottom?" Paterson said. "What we are enabling with Windows 7 [is the ability] to try to maintain higher average selling prices...This doesn't have to be about who can get to $199 first."







Talkback
Does this sound suspiciously like the "Vista Ready" / "Vista Capable" fiasco to anyone else? Microsoft will (grudgingly) sell a lobotomized version of Windows 7 (Starter Edition) on netbooks, but what they really want to do is figure out how to force the customer to buy Windows 7 Home Premium? If you remove (Starter Edition) above, and substitute (Home Basic), does that look more familiar?
Windows 7 "Starter Edition" has been lobotomized in a different way than Vista Home Basic was. But the result is going to be the same. Consumers are going to get their nice new laptops home, start working with them... and then suddenly find out that it can't do the things they want it to. Microsoft insists that they fork over more money to get "real" Windows.
I hope and pray that they once again land in court with a mountain of lawsuits over this latest piece of idiocy.
jw 13/3/2009
So MS really think that net books can't handle any kind of media? Where the hell have they been looking? early issue acer one has no problem with video, music, i player or displaying the 3D visualiser twisted pixel.
That's running on XP 512MB ram and a small 8gb SD HD. Newer one's will surely have no trouble either!
unfortunately MS is not going to give away a free edition. Windows 7 is Windows 7. "it should be possible to run comfortably..." this says all. MS wants to make money and it's their right. but again, it's a failure. Vista made the "clever" people upgrade their machines to run it, Win 7 needs similar hardware but now they want to run it on even lower spec machines (netbooks)? and i'm still or better will be not surprised how many people will jump on the boat and still continue complain.
Indeed, why not start from scratch with a "good" net book OS, or just keep XP on them. It won't be that long untill net books start to have the spec that makes them run quickly.
there are so many different GNU/Linux flavors out there and for everybody there is something interesting. fast, small, fully featured, different desktop environments, window managers etc etc. you can get so many different sleak, fully loaded and totally individual OS built on GNU/Linux that it would arise the questions: why botherting why the same boring windows thing?
Before you damn Windows 7 too much, I would point out that the beta (7000) runs very well on my netbook, a Lenovo s10e. Of course, it is not quite feature complete but, on the basis of published information, it does not appear that these features should have a significant impact on performance; if they do, that'll be a bit of an own goal.
Currently I'm running a triple boot of XP, Ubuntu and Win7. They all run well, surprising well!
Nevertheless, I don't like the sound of a crippled version of Win7 for netbooks, shades of Vista Basic and all the bad PR that went with that. Lets face it, M$ do have to make a play for netbooks but I do not have to like their monopoly......
Moley, I have little doubt that Microsoft CAN make Windows work reasonably well on netbooks, and I think often about your positive report about it on your S10. The question is, how deeply will they insist on reaching into the consumer's pocket, and how much will they put commercial considerations ahead of technical considerations in order to reach a little deeper?
jw
The big question is how fast will it be. I usually try out Betas on slow or older hardware first to see what will happen. The usual tech guys in the media seem to like to report about the new Betas running on the latest or fastest piece of equipment they have in-house. I would be very surprised if the OS DIDN'T run well. But trying to get it to run on older equipment gives you a much better idea how well it will run on what you already own and what OS you are already running.
I'm going to try running it on a 1GHz P3 to see what happens. That will semi-equate with an Atom or Celeron CPU at 1 GHz. It will certainly answer the netbook question. If it runs on a P3 it certainly without a doubt OUGHT to run on a current netbook.
This is a prediction I will make. Windows 7 will be out by the fall and it will make in-roads much faster to the business community than Vista ever did. I also predict that shrink-wrap sales will be much bigger simply because everybody that's had to deal with Vista on their CURRENT laptops will be looking for a solution going forward and not backward. They'll also be happy keeping what hardware they have and new laptop sales will droop big time.
I do not like it but reality checks are part of my work. Laptop Linux isn't going to make much of a dent unless Android gets a real BIG push by Google onto the same netbook models WIn 7 ends up on. The Gorilla can push Linux around all it wants and Win 7 Basic or Starter or Windows for Dummies, whatever they want to call it, will push Linux into the corner again.
I wouldn't be surprised to see coupons attached to Win7 equipped Netbooks. $30 refund for Win 7 Starter edition (Windows7 for FREE) OR $50 off Windows Home Basic. All done on the Internet. You type in a 25 character code you get on the certificate, your credit card number and the MS Mothership downloads a special token to your netbook that unlocks Windows Home Basic already on your computer, Viola! Microsoft will still be able to worm their way unto your system and reach around to your back wallet pocket.
I agree with almost all of your predictions. I think one thing you might have overlooked is that if Microsoft doesn't make some sort of rational upgrade from XP to Win7 possible, without requiring either a complete reinstallation or an intermediate step through Vista, there is once again going to be considerable resistance from users, both home and business, who are still happily running XP.
jw
Being able to jump over the Vista step though I think will be fairly important.
This post has been removed by a moderator.