Why mighty MS missed the boat

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

NEWS
While investors continue to buy technology stocks at a torrid pace, the most prolific technology stock of all time has become something of a leper. Veteran traders will tell you the recent weakness in Microsoft's stock exemplifies the pathetically fragile psyche of today's investor. In today's momentum-oriented market, one slip-up or even the rumour of a possible misstep can send a stock into slump that erodes hundreds of millions or even billions of dollars in market capitalisation in no time at all. In Microsoft's case, the November 5 finding of fact ruling by federal Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson hasn't sent the stock into an unfettered nosedive. Ahead of the harshly worded decision, Microsoft shares closed at 91 9/16. Two weeks later, it's trading at around $85 (£53) a whack. The dip isn't a big deal, especially considering some of the dour predictions made by leading financial analysts ahead of or immediately following the decree. But it's not too often Microsoft misses a tech rally. Microsoft's shares have stagnated below $90 a share during these past few weeks while the rest of the Nasdaq composite has exploded. Closing at record highs on record volume, the Nasdaq has gained more than 200 points in this same period. What makes the inert status of Microsoft's stock so confounding is the fact that its normally conservative chief financial officer, Greg Maffei, went out on a limb, telling analysts that their original second-quarter profit estimate of 39 cents a share was "a little low." If this DOJ thing weren't consuming the world's attention, this bullish forecast undoubtedly would have sent Microsoft shares skyward. In fact, its first-quarter earnings weren't too shabby either. In the quarter, it made $2.19 billion, or 38 cents a share, on sales of $5.78 billion, topping First Call estimates by 4 cents a share. Yet, Microsoft's shares were trading at 86 5/16 ahead of the October 19 earnings report.Coming off those fantastic earnings and the projection for even better earnings this quarter, Microsoft's stock has actually regressed. Analysts went back to the drawing board and revised their consensus estimate upward to 42 cents a share. But if you look at its stock chart, you'd swear it preannounced lower earnings. Since its initial public offering in March 1986, Microsoft's stock has redefined what investors call a "blue-chip" stock. While information technology continues to change at light speed, Microsoft manages to carry on as one of the few consistently spectacular stocks of its time. In its 13 years as a publicly traded company, Microsoft has delivered six 2-for-1 stock splits and two 3-for-2 splits. Its latest 2-for-1 split came in March. That performance is why analysts say it's time to stock up on Microsoft."It's a great buying opportunity ahead of a big product cycle," said Chris Galvin, an analyst at Hambrecht & Quist. "There's still a long way to go in this DOJ thing and it's quite possible that it could be resolved in way that makes Microsoft much more valuable than it already is." Regardless of whatever remedies or penalties or settlements come from the government's antitrust case, the one thing investors can count on is the arrival of Windows 2000 sometime in February. Customers don't care as much about the ramifications of an antitrust case as they do the productivity of their computers. "One of the toughest things for an investor to do is buy into a stock when it's out of favour," said Jeff Maxick, an analyst at Madison Securities. "But if you look back at its history, it's always been a good idea to buy Microsoft on its dips." Actually, it's been a good idea to buy Microsoft any time. "Long term, this is a great time to pick up the stock," Maxick said. "The DOJ case has caused this stock to underperform and it probably won't pick up momentum until after its second-quarter earnings report in January. It's like everyone's been taking their money out of Microsoft in the past couple weeks to buy everything else." It's hard to believe Microsoft shares were trading at a 52-week high of 100 3/4 in July after falling to a low of 53 3/4 last November. Time to 'load up'? While most investors are clearly preoccupied by the great unknown, some welcome Microsoft's latest stall. "It's time to load up," said James Portanova, a computer consultant from New York, following the finding of fact ruling. "Thank you, Judge Penfield. I have had some outstanding buy orders on Microsoft for more than a week now, anticipating they'd lose the first round. Everyone expected them to do so. I'll be glad when the stock price comes down off the mountain for a while." Thirty-three of the 36 analysts following the stock maintain either a "buy" or "strong buy" recommendation. First Call consensus predicts Microsoft will close out fiscal 2000 with a profit of $1.64 a share. See techTrader for more technology investment news, plus quotes and research. Take me to the DoJ/Microsoft special .

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

BrownieBoy

@Jack, > Works really well for thieves.... Nice attempt to deflect the argument by tossing in a point that's totally irrelevant, even it were...

13 hours ago by BrownieBoy on AMD Ultrathins to challenge Intel Ultrabooks
bootlegger

Make that 13 people now - I got refused today at Manchester airport. I thought I was up to date on this legislation - I knew of the EU ruling from...

16 hours ago by bootlegger on UK airport body scans will not be opt out
tinycg

Don't forget to check out apps like GoodReader or SlideShark either, they're indispensible for people on the go in presentation situations. Best...

19 hours ago by tinycg on Four top iPad apps for people on the move
TerryRK

Well it seems there is something a number of us agree on. Why is the Ubuntu Unity launcher so ugly? I thought perhaps it was something to do with...

23 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Freebies202

Duplicate comments are not made intentionally. Its very good to know that now you are keeping check on this problem because sometimes a commenter...

1 day ago by Freebies202 on Microsoft fixes blog comments, speeds up blogs with open source
kevinmchapman

"the very significant number of users" and "many (most) of us" - you have no evidence for these statements. It is a fact that most users are saying...

2 days ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Marg Menzies Harrison

Another grammar faux pas is the improper use of "you". When sitting down down in a restaurant, for example, I get cringe when the waitress...

2 days ago by Marg Menzies Harrison via Facebook on 10 flagrant grammar mistakes that make you look stupid
zdnetukuser

And NOW, folks, for Canonical's next trick... Kubuntu is late. Here's a pencil. Draw your own conclusions. cf.:...

2 days ago by zdnetukuser on Linux Minterface
Moley

@kevinmchapman. The discussion here reflects the very significant number of users who really do like the traditional menu system and who wish to...

2 days ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

Er, no... It is an efficient means of finding the application/file/setting you need in one place. The icons are a simply a fallback for when you...

2 days ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

Isn't the provision of a text based search an admission by the developers that the mass of icons approach does not work? I don't need to use a...

2 days ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

"Unity and GNOME 3 both abandon the old text-based cascading menus in favour of a graphical icon-driven system." Point truly missed. Both use a...

2 days ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

whs001 - Thank you, I'm glad you liked the article. I absolutely agree with you on your first point. I should perhaps have made it clearer that...

2 days ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Dennis Nilsson

If we allow corporate interest to dictate the way our government circumvents due process against foreign entities then we should accept the same...

2 days ago by Dennis Nilsson via Facebook on ACTA stumbles in Germany
GHar123

I totally dislike pirating of works, I fear that artists will be deterred from creating works if they think that they are going to get ripped off....

2 days ago by GHar123 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
JCB33

How dare film makers, artists or anybody that invests in creativity stop us pirating their works for free. I want to be able to walk into my local...

2 days ago by JCB33 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
Moley

@GrueMaster. I prefer horses for courses rather than one size fits all. I, and I suspect most other computer users, do not really wish to have...

2 days ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
greycynic

The product that scares me every time I have to use it is the Office 2007 version of Excel. The first bug that I found was applying the median...

2 days ago by greycynic on Ten flawed products that derail productivity
GrueMaster

Nice review and very informative. One thing I'd like to add (in reply to whs001's 1st question), the main reason to have the same interface from...

3 days ago by GrueMaster on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Frederick Wrigley

I'be been using Mint 12 since the RC came out, and I am far more happy with the Cinnamon, the Mate, and, yes (with extensions), theGnome 3...

3 days ago by Frederick Wrigley via Facebook on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint