On Tuesday, the company released the changes to the Windows operating system and the Explorer browser. It also launched a Web site offering advice to Web developers who use the browser to design their own sites and applications and who work with tools from companies including Apple Computer, Macromedia and RealNetworks.
In August, a federal court in Chicago ruled that Microsoft must pay $521m (£312m) to Eolas and the University of California after finding that Internet Explorer infringed on a patent related to plug-in technology. The university owns the patent, which it licensed to Eolas in 1994. Although Eolas suggested that Microsoft pay licensing fees related to the disputed patent, the giant software maker decided to alter the browser while it continues to appeal the court's decision.
"This ruling affects more than just Microsoft; it affects a broad array of partners and customers -- including companies that many would view as competitors," Michael Wallent, general manager of the Windows Client Platform at Microsoft, said in a statement. "Microsoft has been very proactive in reaching out to this group to develop steps that will reduce or eliminate the ruling's impact on consumers and other companies, even as we appeal it."
The alterations proposed by Microsoft include changes to the manner in which Explorer handles some Web pages that use ActiveX Controls, object-oriented programming technologies and tools found in plug-in software such as Macromedia's Flash, Apple's QuickTime, and RealNetworks' RealOne. Microsoft said it expects to make the changes to Explorer by early 2004.
If Web developers choose not to implement Microsoft's recommended changes, visitors to their sites may see a pop-up box informing them of such before Explorer will load any affected plug-in software. Microsoft also said it was working with partners to create guidelines for building Web pages making use of the pop-up box unnecessary.
Since plug-ins are also a key feature of other Web browsers, it is thought that the Eolas decision could affect other vendors such as Opera Software and contributors to open-source groups like Mozilla.org. Other potential targets include companies that redistribute open-source browser software or base products on such programs including Red Hat, SuSE Linux, Apple and Hewlett-Packard.
Talkback
What! Not more lawsuits and digs. I am not always a lover of Microsoft software, and sometimes the way they market their products borders on the insane, But come on!, this is now getting a bit out of hand. A lot of these companies would not be around today if it was not for Microsoft and IBM getting their act together in the 70's. Now it appears to be "Lets have a pop at Microsoft" century. I think that it is now time for everyone to sit back and think about their futures. If Bill Gates decides to wind up Microsoft tomorrow and throw all to the wolves. You will find that the market will collapse. Whilst Bill may decide to retire gracefully in a few years time, he would leave the company intact. Keep on chipping away at the foundations, and you will have a very major headache if the structure crumbles. It appears the American trend of sue and counter sue has got a foot hold in every corner of the world thinking it is Easy Money. What next, sueing your neighbour for breathing air in your house or garden??? Scary, but looking closer every day!!