Microsoft uncovers new patching plan

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

NEWS
Microsoft will focus on adding new security technologies to its products, educating its customers and improving its process of releasing patches, chief executive Steve Ballmer pledged on Thursday.

In the most significant security announcement since chairman Bill Gates unveiled the software giant's Trustworthy Computing Initiative, Ballmer told attendees during a keynote address at the software giant's first Worldwide Partner Conference in New Orleans that Microsoft will redouble its efforts to secure its users.

"Our goal is simple: get our customers secure and keep them secure," Ballmer said in a statement. "Our commitment is to protect our customers from the growing wave of criminal attacks."

The pledge comes as Microsoft is trying to recover from the attacks of online vandals and critics. In August and September, the MSBlast worm probably infected more than a million computers that run Microsoft Windows.

The SoBig.F email virus also spread widely during those months, compromising many more systems. Such incidents were used to support a position paper seven well-respected security researchers wrote, which the Computer and Communications Industry Association, a noted Microsoft critic, released on 24 September.

And a lawsuit that charges Microsoft with making computer users' personal data vulnerable was filed against the company a week ago, on behalf of a victim of identity fraud.

Microsoft said it will focus on initiatives in three areas: improving its system of patching its software products; adding and improving security technologies to Windows XP and 2003; and educating customers.

A major change for system administrators bogged down by a to-do list of patches to apply to Windows computers is the software giant's move to a monthly patch release schedule. Microsoft will immediately start to release software updates once a month, unless the security flaw needs to be fixed immediately in order to help customers avoid an attack, said Amy Carroll, director of product management in Microsoft's security business unit.

"One of the things that we have heard from our customers is that deploying patches on a weekly basis is too difficult," she said. "There is some anecdotal evidence that deploying a patch is what prompts the release of exploit code."

The software giant also plans to shrink the size of patches up to 30 percent by next May and reduce the number of updates that require the user to reboot the system. Microsoft will also reduce the number of patching systems for its products lines to two. The company has also pledged to continue support for users of Windows NT4 service pack 6a and Windows 2000 service pack 2, both of which are products for which the company had previously halted support.

Building on set base
Microsoft will focus on modifying and adding to the security measures it has already taken for its current products, Carroll said.

PC and network protection measures such as the Internet Connection Firewall will be turned on by default and will be designed to work better with other applications. Executable file filtering, which is a measure that protects Outlook users from attachments that could carry viruses and Trojan horse programs, will be expanded to other Microsoft products. Internet Explorer's system of security zones will be revamped to better protect users. And better defences against memory flaws will be erected in the software development process and, potentially, in hardware.

"The areas that we are focusing on represent the four main vectors of attacks that we have seen," Carroll said.

The company also plans to further educate its customers in hopes that it can help them become more secure, she said. Monthly Webcasts will be published on the company's site to train customers in good security practices, and the company will use itself -- in a series called "How Microsoft secures Microsoft" -- as an example to teach system administrators ways to secure their systems.

"We have the goal of, by the end of 2004, that we have trained to some extent 500,000 customers," Carroll said.

Security company Symantec fully supports the Microsoft initiatives, the company stated in a release, despite indications that Microsoft might move into the antivirus software market. In June, the software giant bought Romania-based antivirus firm GeCad.

However, Symantec pointed to a recent report its researchers released as reason enough to support Microsoft's initiatives. The report indicated that attackers were quickly taking advantage of new software security holes.

"Now, more than ever, computer users need to take proper steps to protect themselves from online threats," Janice Chaffin, chief marketing officer at Symantec, said in a statement.

Microsoft plans to provide more details in the future and will continue to modify its security practices until it finds the right recipe, said Neil Charney, director of product management for Microsoft's Windows client group.

"What we learned from customers is that it is not an easy process to secure their systems," he said. "The impetus (behind these changes) is the recognition that there is still work to be done."

Talkback

There is always a new security plan or scheme for Microsoft -"all mouth". It is now the kind of publicity that has become a great deal more than irritating.

Though they give grandeouse names to these new schemes, they seem intent on breaking fundamental security principles at every turn while blaming the crackers for all their woes. A bit like going on holliday to a well documented and advertised mosquito infested swamp only to come back blaming mosquitoes for your malaria.

Everything now shall be thrown in to the kernel, browser & all, and in that manner the kernel shall become everything. Much like giving every cracker a master key to all the doors of a city. This is not the type of design that anyone in their right minds should dream of using for systems outside of the realms of real time operations, embedded operations (caution!), or of single task servers (caution!).

I, like many, grow tired of Microsoft and their sterile hype....

via Facebook 10 October, 2003 10:07
Reply

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

kevinmchapman

"the very significant number of users" and "many (most) of us" - you have no evidence for these statements. It is a fact that most users are saying...

33 minutes ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Marg Menzies Harrison

Another grammar faux pas is the improper use of "you". When sitting down down in a restaurant, for example, I get cringe when the waitress...

2 hours ago by Marg Menzies Harrison via Facebook on 10 flagrant grammar mistakes that make you look stupid
zdnetukuser

And NOW, folks, for Canonical's next trick... Kubuntu is late. Here's a pencil. Draw your own conclusions. cf.:...

3 hours ago by zdnetukuser on Linux Minterface
Moley

@kevinmchapman. The discussion here reflects the very significant number of users who really do like the traditional menu system and who wish to...

5 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

Er, no... It is an efficient means of finding the application/file/setting you need in one place. The icons are a simply a fallback for when you...

6 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

Isn't the provision of a text based search an admission by the developers that the mass of icons approach does not work? I don't need to use a...

7 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

"Unity and GNOME 3 both abandon the old text-based cascading menus in favour of a graphical icon-driven system." Point truly missed. Both use a...

8 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

whs001 - Thank you, I'm glad you liked the article. I absolutely agree with you on your first point. I should perhaps have made it clearer that...

8 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Dennis Nilsson

If we allow corporate interest to dictate the way our government circumvents due process against foreign entities then we should accept the same...

9 hours ago by Dennis Nilsson via Facebook on ACTA stumbles in Germany
GHar123

I totally dislike pirating of works, I fear that artists will be deterred from creating works if they think that they are going to get ripped off....

11 hours ago by GHar123 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
JCB33

How dare film makers, artists or anybody that invests in creativity stop us pirating their works for free. I want to be able to walk into my local...

17 hours ago by JCB33 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
Moley

@GrueMaster. I prefer horses for courses rather than one size fits all. I, and I suspect most other computer users, do not really wish to have...

19 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
greycynic

The product that scares me every time I have to use it is the Office 2007 version of Excel. The first bug that I found was applying the median...

19 hours ago by greycynic on Ten flawed products that derail productivity
GrueMaster

Nice review and very informative. One thing I'd like to add (in reply to whs001's 1st question), the main reason to have the same interface from...

20 hours ago by GrueMaster on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Frederick Wrigley

I'be been using Mint 12 since the RC came out, and I am far more happy with the Cinnamon, the Mate, and, yes (with extensions), theGnome 3...

21 hours ago by Frederick Wrigley via Facebook on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
bdantas

Excellent article. One small correction, though--although a fresh installation of Linux Mint 12 will, indeed, provide the user with a version of...

22 hours ago by bdantas on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

22 hours ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

22 hours ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Moley

For Gnome 2 die-hards, it is possible to add icons to the bottom panel (or top top panel, if you prefer) which provide the exact Gnome 2...

23 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
ramwellian

Your comments would seem pretty naive and immature. Your 'solution' appears to be, "gee, let's all just give in to the hackers and give them...

23 hours ago by ramwellian on Cloud computing security: no more oxymoron?