Microsoft adopts old tricks to push IM

NEWS
Microsoft is set to begin its most aggressive effort yet to sell instant-messaging services to corporations -- and it's pulling out its old playbook to gain traction.

When the company on Tuesday launches Office System, its updated suite of business applications, customers will find hooks to instant messaging (IM) features that are built into email, word processing, spreadsheet and presentation programs.

"Microsoft is doing with the integration of instant messaging and presence in Office what it did with the integration of Internet Explorer with Window 95 and 98," said David Gurle, executive vice president of Reuters Messaging and a former Microsoft executive. "It basically harmonised the development of applications on a common platform."

Microsoft's plans highlight a familiar script for the software giant, which has repeatedly used its market dominance as a launch pad for new products. By building IM functions into Office, Microsoft hopes to provide an incentive for customers to upgrade to the latest and greatest version of its business applications software. But it also hopes to put itself in the driver's seat when it comes to selling IM services to corporations.

IM software lets people exchange text messages in real time with other contacts who use the service. Once a chat tool only teenagers and early adopters used, IM has grown in popularity as services from America Online, Yahoo and Microsoft have multiplied onto millions of computer desktops. What is especially appealing to IM providers is that many of their users are chatting during work and using IM to communicate with contacts inside and outside their corporate firewalls.

Microsoft has earmarked IM as a crucial application since it launched MSN Messenger in 1999. While MSN has battled against rivals AOL and Yahoo ever since, its Windows division has taken an equal interest in IM.

In 2001, Microsoft launched Windows Messenger, an IM application that came bundled with its Windows XP operating system. While MSN Messenger continues to gain Web users outside the firewall, Windows Messenger became the foundation for Microsoft's loftier plans -- its new business IM product that will launch on Tuesday, known as Office Live Communications Server 2003 (LCS).

Now, Microsoft views IM as the spearhead of a broader strategy of running all real-time communications functions in a business. If this vision is realised, LCS will let users see a co-worker's presence status and then immediately send an IM or place a voice call to reach the contact.

"Instant messaging is really the tip of the iceberg here," said Michael Gartenberg, an analyst at Jupiter Research. "It's all about enabling presence in applications and the things you can do with that. It's a logical move on their part."

Office presence
Here's a glimpse at what LCS can currently do: imagine that an employee receives an Excel spreadsheet that a co-worker authored. With LCS, a SmartTag appears under the author's name that allows the employee to right-click on the link in order to check the author's online status. The author may be out to lunch or, perhaps, be online, whereupon the employee can then launch an IM window and send the author a message.

Eventually, corporations with LCS can use Office as a way to contact other employees -- and possibly vendors and customers -- be it through IM, phone or video.

"What Live Communications Server does in context is put presence and instant messaging as the glue that cuts across applications," said Ed Simnett, lead product manager for Microsoft's Live Communications Server division.

Microsoft will take a shot at selling LCS as an add-on to Office instead of shipping it as part of Office's software suite. The company will charge $733 (£437) for the server software and a $25 client licence per person for large-scale buyers. LCS will not work unless the company is running Windows Server 2003 software in their back-end systems. For single copies, the company will charge $929 for the server and $34.95 per head.

Microsoft's foray into business IM comes as demand is growing within corporations for new real-time communications. But it has not reached critical mass, making it a necessary addition for most companies.

For some corporate information technology managers, IM has been more of a curse than a blessing. Since free IM services do not include security or manageability features, many IT departments have blocked these services. In industries that are tightly regulated such as finance and health care, IM conversations have become a liability, because IT departments cannot manage IM conversations like email, where messages can be archived or restricted.

IM providers have taken advantage of this dilemma. AOL, Yahoo and Microsoft have begun selling corporate versions of their IM services that include compliance and security features that they hope will appease IT managers' demands. Rather than having their services disconnected, these companies have instead stumbled on an opportunity to sell IM.

Microsoft is not the only enterprise software company to spot the trend. Its entry into the market follows on the heels of other entrenched giants, such as IBM's Lotus division, considered the leader in corporate IM with its Sametime product. Sun Microsystems, an established player in powering corporate information systems, has integrated enterprise-class IM into its Java Enterprise Server software suite.

The burden of dominance
Competitors have been following LCS' development closely. Some rivals have flagged Microsoft's decision to leverage its Office dominance as a way to launch and distribute LCS. But competitors for now say they are not concerned that LCS will do much to disrupt their own business IM efforts.

Microsoft is "trying to use its particular strength in Office to jump into a new product segment," said Steve Boom, senior vice president of Yahoo Enterprise Solutions, which sells a version of Yahoo Messenger to corporations. "It's definitely something we're paying close attention to."

While integration into Office appears powerful on paper, LCS' multiple tie-ins may be a limiting factor for Microsoft. Installing LCS will not be cheap, because companies must upgrade their back-end and front-end systems to Microsoft's 2003-class software to run LCS in the first place. Enterprise IM is a difficult incentive for companies to uproot their back-end server infrastructure.

"It's a big bet," Reuters' Gurle said. "It's all a function of how quickly (LCS) will get adopted in the market. Now, (Microsoft) has got to push it into corporations. I think the biggest challenge they face is that many (companies) have not upgraded into Windows 2003 yet."

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

Freebies202

Duplicate comments are not made intentionally. Its very good to know that now you are keeping check on this problem because sometimes a commenter...

9 hours ago by Freebies202 on Microsoft fixes blog comments, speeds up blogs with open source
kevinmchapman

"the very significant number of users" and "many (most) of us" - you have no evidence for these statements. It is a fact that most users are saying...

17 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Marg Menzies Harrison

Another grammar faux pas is the improper use of "you". When sitting down down in a restaurant, for example, I get cringe when the waitress...

18 hours ago by Marg Menzies Harrison via Facebook on 10 flagrant grammar mistakes that make you look stupid
zdnetukuser

And NOW, folks, for Canonical's next trick... Kubuntu is late. Here's a pencil. Draw your own conclusions. cf.:...

19 hours ago by zdnetukuser on Linux Minterface
Moley

@kevinmchapman. The discussion here reflects the very significant number of users who really do like the traditional menu system and who wish to...

21 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

Er, no... It is an efficient means of finding the application/file/setting you need in one place. The icons are a simply a fallback for when you...

22 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

Isn't the provision of a text based search an admission by the developers that the mass of icons approach does not work? I don't need to use a...

23 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

"Unity and GNOME 3 both abandon the old text-based cascading menus in favour of a graphical icon-driven system." Point truly missed. Both use a...

1 day ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

whs001 - Thank you, I'm glad you liked the article. I absolutely agree with you on your first point. I should perhaps have made it clearer that...

1 day ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Dennis Nilsson

If we allow corporate interest to dictate the way our government circumvents due process against foreign entities then we should accept the same...

1 day ago by Dennis Nilsson via Facebook on ACTA stumbles in Germany
GHar123

I totally dislike pirating of works, I fear that artists will be deterred from creating works if they think that they are going to get ripped off....

1 day ago by GHar123 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
JCB33

How dare film makers, artists or anybody that invests in creativity stop us pirating their works for free. I want to be able to walk into my local...

1 day ago by JCB33 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
Moley

@GrueMaster. I prefer horses for courses rather than one size fits all. I, and I suspect most other computer users, do not really wish to have...

1 day ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
greycynic

The product that scares me every time I have to use it is the Office 2007 version of Excel. The first bug that I found was applying the median...

1 day ago by greycynic on Ten flawed products that derail productivity
GrueMaster

Nice review and very informative. One thing I'd like to add (in reply to whs001's 1st question), the main reason to have the same interface from...

2 days ago by GrueMaster on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Frederick Wrigley

I'be been using Mint 12 since the RC came out, and I am far more happy with the Cinnamon, the Mate, and, yes (with extensions), theGnome 3...

2 days ago by Frederick Wrigley via Facebook on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
bdantas

Excellent article. One small correction, though--although a fresh installation of Linux Mint 12 will, indeed, provide the user with a version of...

2 days ago by bdantas on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

2 days ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

2 days ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Moley

For Gnome 2 die-hards, it is possible to add icons to the bottom panel (or top top panel, if you prefer) which provide the exact Gnome 2...

2 days ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint