Single PC to adopt multiple OS

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

NEWS
Software giant Microsoft and start-up VMware are bringing closer to reality a technology for running multiple instances of an operating system on a single computer.

The technology, called virtualisation, is a layer of software that isolates programs from the hardware they run on. In the near term, Microsoft hopes to use the idea to support customers with newer computers that must run older programs. But VMware is further along in a strategy to make its software a key part of the utility computing concept popular in the industry.

Microsoft plans to announce on Monday that it has finished development of a new version of Virtual PC for Windows. The software, dubbed Virtual PC 2004, will be available to Microsoft's volume-licence customers and on retail shelves later this year, the company said.

The same day, VMware plans to release new management software that it revealed details about in July under the name Control Center. The software now is called VirtualCentre, said Michael Mullany, vice president of marketing.

VMware also has released a software development kit, so companies such as IBM or HP can more easily integrate the VMware software into their utility computing technology. BMC Software, Computer Associates International, Veritas Software, Hewlett-Packard and IBM are using the kit for that integration task, VMware said.

VMware's main software line now is designed for servers -- networked machines for data storage and processing. Microsoft's Virtual Server product, though, isn't expected until early 2004, and, for now, the software giant is focused on PCs.

Virtualisation born again
Virtualisation, an old concept, is experiencing a new surge of attention from companies such as IBM, HP, Microsoft and Sun Microsystems that are working on ways to link multiple servers and storage systems into pools of computing power under the utility computing method.

By allowing administrators, or even automated management software, to move computing jobs easily from one hardware system to another, virtualisation makes it easier to upgrade hardware, allocate more computing horsepower to a given job, adjust to equipment failure or make other changes.

The packages from VMware and Microsoft dovetail with the utility computing vision, Illuminata analyst Gordon Haff said. "The less connection to physical reality, the more virtualised you can be. VMware and Virtual Server are part of that."

And VMware is doing well, he added. "They've got to be about the most successful small company in IT right now," Haff said.

VMware's management software lets administrators control how virtual machine software runs on numerous computers. With the addition of software called VMotion, it lets one virtual machine be wrapped up and moved to another computer.

The management software costs $5,000 (£2,995), plus $300 per processor on the servers it controls. The VMotion package costs an extra $700 per processor.

Microsoft acquired Virtual PC and other virtual machine technology in February from Connectix for an undisclosed price.

With its new Virtual PC product, Microsoft is lowering the suggested price from $229 to $129, while adding a few new features such as support for up to four network adapters per virtual machine and support for up to 4GB of memory, which helps more operating systems run at the same time and can boost performance. The price does not include the cost of whatever operating system is being run under Virtual PC.

For Microsoft, Virtual PC represents a way to try to convince companies that have not upgraded their PCs to Windows XP to do so. The software can help companies that have avoided upgrading because they run older software that doesn't work in Microsoft's latest operating system.

"This does provide them a way to migrate to Win XP professional," said Carla Huffman, a Microsoft product manager for Virtual PC.

Virtual PC doesn't preclude Linux
Although Microsoft is pitching Virtual PC primarily as a way to run several versions of Windows on one machine, or even the old OS/2, the software also will run various versions of Linux. Microsoft said it will refer Linux-related problems to the Linux vendor but that if the problem appears to be a bug in Virtual PC, it will work with the Linux company to resolve the issue.

Virtual PC is seen by Microsoft as a good tool for developers and information technology managers who want to test new software in a way that is safer. In fact, the company distributed a test copy of Virtual PC for Windows 2004 to developers at its recent Professional Developers Conference in hopes they might use the software to try out the preview version of Longhorn, which is the next version of Windows and still in the early stages of development.

"It's a great way to try out Longhorn," Huffman said, noting that one of the key features of Virtual PC is its ability to isolate problems on the virtual machine from the host, meaning that if Longhorn crashes while running under Virtual PC, it doesn't bring down an entire PC.

Talkback

No one cares if you can run Linux on a Virtual Pc running on Windows. They want to run Windows on a virtual PC running on Linux.

Windows on Linux makes sense, but Linux on Windows allows Linux have a BSOD!!

via Facebook 10 November, 2003 20:04
Reply

I know there is always this huge memory loss when it comes to the Macintosh, but this ability to run multiple OS's on one machine is years old. Virtual PC has been on the Mac for a long time and has allowed a user to run all flavors of Windows, Linux and any other operating system that runs on the x86 architecture right next to the Mac operating system in a window. Sharing resources and periperals couldn't be easier. There is/was also SoftPC, which accomplished the same thing. Plus, there is an open-source product for the X11 environment that has been running Win98 and below for a long time. And let us not forget MOL (Mac on Linux) that lets Linux users run Mac OS's as well. Once again, because Microsoft brings out a product or embraces a technology, it is treated as "new" and "innovative" even though they are years behind in many areas.

via Facebook 10 November, 2003 21:34
Reply

I'm a bit confused... Is Microsoft again claiming credit for something that has been around for years? VirtualPC has been running... Oh, hells never mind. Microsoft is the innovation GOD!

via Facebook 11 November, 2003 01:27
Reply

Old news.
For the last two years, I have run X11, Windows (first 98SE now XP Pro) the Mac OS 9 and OS X on one machine- unsually two or three systems concurrently. Its a Mac - a Titatnium Powerbook to be exact.
Virtual PC has been around forever, and with OSX providing the *nix boost, I have it all, already, in one machine.

via Facebook 11 November, 2003 15:22
Reply

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

kevinmchapman

"the very significant number of users" and "many (most) of us" - you have no evidence for these statements. It is a fact that most users are saying...

8 minutes ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Marg Menzies Harrison

Another grammar faux pas is the improper use of "you". When sitting down down in a restaurant, for example, I get cringe when the waitress...

2 hours ago by Marg Menzies Harrison via Facebook on 10 flagrant grammar mistakes that make you look stupid
zdnetukuser

And NOW, folks, for Canonical's next trick... Kubuntu is late. Here's a pencil. Draw your own conclusions. cf.:...

2 hours ago by zdnetukuser on Linux Minterface
Moley

@kevinmchapman. The discussion here reflects the very significant number of users who really do like the traditional menu system and who wish to...

4 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

Er, no... It is an efficient means of finding the application/file/setting you need in one place. The icons are a simply a fallback for when you...

6 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

Isn't the provision of a text based search an admission by the developers that the mass of icons approach does not work? I don't need to use a...

7 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

"Unity and GNOME 3 both abandon the old text-based cascading menus in favour of a graphical icon-driven system." Point truly missed. Both use a...

8 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

whs001 - Thank you, I'm glad you liked the article. I absolutely agree with you on your first point. I should perhaps have made it clearer that...

8 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Dennis Nilsson

If we allow corporate interest to dictate the way our government circumvents due process against foreign entities then we should accept the same...

9 hours ago by Dennis Nilsson via Facebook on ACTA stumbles in Germany
GHar123

I totally dislike pirating of works, I fear that artists will be deterred from creating works if they think that they are going to get ripped off....

10 hours ago by GHar123 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
JCB33

How dare film makers, artists or anybody that invests in creativity stop us pirating their works for free. I want to be able to walk into my local...

16 hours ago by JCB33 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
Moley

@GrueMaster. I prefer horses for courses rather than one size fits all. I, and I suspect most other computer users, do not really wish to have...

18 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
greycynic

The product that scares me every time I have to use it is the Office 2007 version of Excel. The first bug that I found was applying the median...

18 hours ago by greycynic on Ten flawed products that derail productivity
GrueMaster

Nice review and very informative. One thing I'd like to add (in reply to whs001's 1st question), the main reason to have the same interface from...

20 hours ago by GrueMaster on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Frederick Wrigley

I'be been using Mint 12 since the RC came out, and I am far more happy with the Cinnamon, the Mate, and, yes (with extensions), theGnome 3...

21 hours ago by Frederick Wrigley via Facebook on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
bdantas

Excellent article. One small correction, though--although a fresh installation of Linux Mint 12 will, indeed, provide the user with a version of...

21 hours ago by bdantas on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

22 hours ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

22 hours ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Moley

For Gnome 2 die-hards, it is possible to add icons to the bottom panel (or top top panel, if you prefer) which provide the exact Gnome 2...

23 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
ramwellian

Your comments would seem pretty naive and immature. Your 'solution' appears to be, "gee, let's all just give in to the hackers and give them...

23 hours ago by ramwellian on Cloud computing security: no more oxymoron?