Issuing an update to XP would represent a significant shift for the software maker, which for months has insisted that it had no plans to create a separate version of Windows before Longhorn. A company executive confirmed to CNET News.com on Thursday that Microsoft is now discussing a product internally referred to as "Windows XP Reloaded."
Any further release would follow Windows XP Service Pack 2, a security-oriented upgrade that is slated to arrive before midyear. The features that would be included in an update are still under discussion, Windows lead product manager Greg Sullivan said in an interview.
"Calling it an interim release is overstating the current plan," Sullivan said. "We are exploring ways to add value to Windows XP."
However, Directions on Microsoft analyst Rob Helm said that any new version of Windows is likely to slow Longhorn's arrival.
"There's one Windows team and there's one core group of people [developing it]," Helm said. "If they do plan an interim release, it will have an impact on the schedule. How much will depend on what's in it."
Helm said that Windows XP Reloaded sounds like what he would term an interim release. "To my mind, a service pack with features that has the potential to impact compatibility is an interim release."
Helm did say that one option available to Microsoft is to try to boost some of the surrounding programs that are bundled with Windows while making fewer changes to the core OS. Such a "feature pack" could mean less of a delay.
In addition to adding further question to the already uncertain timing of Longhorn, Helm said Microsoft's constantly changing release schedule makes it harder for customers to plan.
"In the consumer market it's less important, but in the enterprise market, it's really important for Microsoft to provide a roadmap -- and not just of major big-bang releases, but also of service packs. Right now that road map is still pretty hazy."
Executives have said for some time that there was no major release of Windows planned before Longhorn. At the Windows Hardware Engineering Conference in May, senior vice president Will Poole said: "Don't expect an interim release."
Poole said at that time that Longhorn would ship in 2005. Microsoft later backed away from that date, saying only that it would ship when it is ready. However, until now, Microsoft has reiterated that no new versions of Windows were planned before Longhorn.
Microsoft had been planning to update to its two specialised versions of Windows -- Media Centre and Tablet PC -- before Longhorn. Those updates, which are now in testing, will include service pack security enhancements and new features.
Delaying Longhorn could further benefit Linux, considered the chief threat to the dominance of Windows, said RedMonk analyst Stephen O'Grady.
"With any delay of Longhorn, Linux desktop advocates have potentially gained an extension to the window for getting their respective offerings established within enterprises," O'Grady said. Already, analysts had cautioned that the long time frame between Windows XP's debut and the arrival of Longhorn represented perhaps the best opportunity for Linux to make headway on the desktop.
"While Longhorn's promise of an overhauled user interface and database/file system blend will undoubtedly set the bar for desktops when it's ultimately released, the longer it's delayed the more time Linux has to get a foothold in the desktop market."
The release of Longhorn is seen as critical for Microsoft, with the company having tied new versions of Office and much of its server software to coincide with the new OS, which chairman Bill Gates has called the biggest advance since Windows 95.
Sullivan said that the possible release of XP Reloaded does not indicate a delay for Longhorn. Microsoft has not said when that OS will ship, but analysts have said they expect it in late 2005 or 2006.
It is too soon to say if any development resources will be needed for XP Reloaded beyond the current teams working on Windows XP maintenance, he added.
The move comes as Microsoft is looking for ways to ensure that existing Windows XP users upgrade to the more secure Service Pack 2 code base.
"We're very interested in having as many people as possible -- new PC buyers and installed base -- take advantage of the work we've done in SP 2."
News.com's Stephen Shankland contributed to this report.






Talkback
Why yet another release ? Many people are perfectly happy on 98, ME, 2000 and XP ? 2000 and XP are stable and more than enough for most people's requirements. What advantage will there be to another OS release; why not simply release a powerful SP3 at the end of the year or the middle of next year - kind of like what they did with NT.
If M$ did just release a SP3 for win XP, where would they get the money from. Don't forget, 90+% of all the world's desktops run Windows, so it just makes more business sense to release a new version that every new computer has preloaded, than release a service pack.
Anyway, why not just use Linux?
Its good the Microsoft recognises the fact that the IT industry is constantly moving forward.
When XP was first launched up and coming requirements such as PCI Express or the AMD 64Bit processor may not have even been on the drawing board.
Microsoft has commited that changes introduced Longhorn such as Indigo for communication services and Avalon for graphics will be backwardly compatible.
Knowing all this it's pretty clear why Microsoft are considering another update so future users of these feature will be able to continue to use Windows XP so the user will not need to move operating system or upgrade.
Foe pas of the past such as not being able to use USB on NT4 are hopefully dead and gone, so continuing to commiting to support the current operating system is a good thing, it show that the bad old days when Microsoft would tell you just to upgrade have gone.
Now with Linux, would this upgrade be free? I have just spent £300 on the new version of RHL and it has less in it than the previous version (where has clustering gone? Oh it's a separate product now. Surprise! Surprise! How much extra do I have to pay for that? who said Linux software's free ???) and to add insult ... it doesn't have the latest kernal release! Linux is going down hill.
I have a Tiny computer using windows X P, I TRIED TO RELOAD, half through it says I requirecd 0.50. Tiny Computer is under receivership. How can I obtain such a Cd?