Microsoft will be offering anyone who's "unsure" about whether they've got dodgy software the chance to have it checked out by Microsoft, with the promise that if it does turn out to be counterfeit, they'll replace it.
The deal only covers Windows XP and only five copies per person can be swapped. It's all free, bar the initial postage and packing. The offer only applies to pre-installed home or professional Windows XP bought before 1 November.
Alex Hilton, Microsoft's licence compliance manager, said the bulk of piracy seen by Microsoft was in the OEM (original equipment manufacturer) sector.
"Some examples we're seeing from the Far East and eastern Europe... are very high quality", Hilton said, and are aimed at the high-end user. "That's the sector we're trying to address."
Hilton also said that anyone found with the pirate programme won't suffer legal repercussions but their suppliers might. "Our goal is not to prosecute the individual, our goal is to get to the source," he said, adding that a decision on prosecution would be made on a case by case basis.
While Microsoft is hoping to get some idea of the extent of piracy in the UK with the programme, it seems consumers' might be even more interested.
When Redmond launched its Windows Genuine Advantage program to let its customers check if they'd bought genuine software, it thought only 20,000 people would take it up on its offer. After a month, more that 800,000 had.
To get a replacement copy of Windows XP, PC users will need to send off their receipt and complete a witness statement, revealing where they bought their knock-off software. More information can be found here.
Around 29 per cent of software applications in use in the UK are thought to be pirated, according to analyst group IDC.
Talkback
Consumer friendly?
I'm not so sure. With wordings found in Microsoft documents like "This statement is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. If it is used in evidence, I understand that I will be liable for prosecution if I have wilfully stated in it anything that I know to be false or do not believe to be true." it's sounding a bit risky for the consumer in question. For instance, what's the legal definition of 'know to be false'?
As such I would strongly recommend to at least wait for the legal opinion of various consumer organizations before doing anything.
For one, Microsoft would like you to send various original documents to them. Doesn't that mean sending out your own proof of purchase to then wait and see if it doesn't get lost, misplaced, wrongly filed, etc.?