Windows Forms to go open source?

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

NEWS

Microsoft is considering the release of source code for a popular tool used to build Windows programs.

In a blog posting last week, Shawn Burke, a development manager at Microsoft's Windows Forms team, floated the idea of releasing the source code to Windows Forms to its developer customers. Windows Forms is a programming model used with Microsoft's Visual Studio tools to build the user interface portion of Windows desktop applications.

Burke made clear that open sourcing Windows Forms is under consideration, but that no decisions have been made.

He said that the idea faces hurdles, including legal issues, security and cost, and that the move is not universally supported within Microsoft. But at the same time, Burke noted that other teams within the developer division are working on projects to make code available as well.

Jason Matusow, the director of Microsoft’s Shared Source programme, said there are many products being evaluated on a case-by-case basis for inclusion in the programme.

Before releasing source code, Microsoft weighs many considerations, including backward compatibility, interoperability and the need to balance open source code releases with Microsoft's proprietary closed source products. "We have to look at who the users are and what problem they are trying to solve," Matusow said.

The open source development model allows collaborators to view code and submit changes, such as bug fixes or enhancements. Many open source software projects, such as the freely available Linux operating system and the OpenOffice desktop application suite, pose a competitive threat to Microsoft's business, and the company, in general, closely guards access to its source code.

However, the software giant continues to add to the list of products that have a licence that allows big companies, government customers, partners or academics to view all or portions of the source code. Its shared source program addresses several products, including the Windows CE operating system for devices and other tools targeted at programmers.

In September, Microsoft made the code for FlexWiki -- collaborative Web authoring software -- freely available and available under an open source licence. Also in 2004, the company released Windows Installer XML, or WiX, to SourceForge, following up a month later with the posting of the Windows Template Library, or WTL, project. All three products were released under the Common Public License (CPL).

In 2002, Microsoft submitted its Rotor project, which included the source code to its Common Language Infrastructure -- the software underpinning Microsoft's Visual Studio development tools -- to the standards body ECMA International.

As with these other efforts, making the source code of Windows Forms available is meant to appeal to programmers, who covet access to the inner-workings of products.

"[Source code] helps them become better programmers," said James Governor, an analyst at RedMonk. "The best developers like to know how things work."

Microsoft's Burke said he would like to release the code of Windows Forms as well as a bug-tracking database. In theory, access to the code and known bugs will allow programmers to better understand the tool and separate a product bug from their own.

Releasing the source code of any product does carry the risk that virus writers will have more insight into how to cripple a product. Yet Burke took the opposite view, saying that the security risk would be minimal.

"If you have a security hole and you 'hope' someone doesn't find it because it's difficult to find, you're in trouble. They'll find it," he wrote.

Having gathered feedback from customers, Burke said he would pursue the plan to release the Windows Forms code in the most expedient manner possible. Most likely, he said, Microsoft would strip out human-readable comments within the code, which could have references to specific customers or inappropriate language.

"No promises but I'm feeling optimistic," Burke wrote.

Talkback

Likely the 'references to specific customers or inappropriate language' within the source code will be the most interesting parts to learn about.

Also, 'Microsoft's shared source programme' shouldn't be compared to Open Source. There are vital differences between the two which ZDNet should have mentioned.

via Facebook 8 February, 2005 16:43
Reply

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

Freebies202

Duplicate comments are not made intentionally. Its very good to know that now you are keeping check on this problem because sometimes a commenter...

6 hours ago by Freebies202 on Microsoft fixes blog comments, speeds up blogs with open source
kevinmchapman

"the very significant number of users" and "many (most) of us" - you have no evidence for these statements. It is a fact that most users are saying...

14 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Marg Menzies Harrison

Another grammar faux pas is the improper use of "you". When sitting down down in a restaurant, for example, I get cringe when the waitress...

16 hours ago by Marg Menzies Harrison via Facebook on 10 flagrant grammar mistakes that make you look stupid
zdnetukuser

And NOW, folks, for Canonical's next trick... Kubuntu is late. Here's a pencil. Draw your own conclusions. cf.:...

16 hours ago by zdnetukuser on Linux Minterface
Moley

@kevinmchapman. The discussion here reflects the very significant number of users who really do like the traditional menu system and who wish to...

18 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

Er, no... It is an efficient means of finding the application/file/setting you need in one place. The icons are a simply a fallback for when you...

20 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

Isn't the provision of a text based search an admission by the developers that the mass of icons approach does not work? I don't need to use a...

21 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

"Unity and GNOME 3 both abandon the old text-based cascading menus in favour of a graphical icon-driven system." Point truly missed. Both use a...

22 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

whs001 - Thank you, I'm glad you liked the article. I absolutely agree with you on your first point. I should perhaps have made it clearer that...

22 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Dennis Nilsson

If we allow corporate interest to dictate the way our government circumvents due process against foreign entities then we should accept the same...

23 hours ago by Dennis Nilsson via Facebook on ACTA stumbles in Germany
GHar123

I totally dislike pirating of works, I fear that artists will be deterred from creating works if they think that they are going to get ripped off....

1 day ago by GHar123 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
JCB33

How dare film makers, artists or anybody that invests in creativity stop us pirating their works for free. I want to be able to walk into my local...

1 day ago by JCB33 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
Moley

@GrueMaster. I prefer horses for courses rather than one size fits all. I, and I suspect most other computer users, do not really wish to have...

1 day ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
greycynic

The product that scares me every time I have to use it is the Office 2007 version of Excel. The first bug that I found was applying the median...

1 day ago by greycynic on Ten flawed products that derail productivity
GrueMaster

Nice review and very informative. One thing I'd like to add (in reply to whs001's 1st question), the main reason to have the same interface from...

1 day ago by GrueMaster on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Frederick Wrigley

I'be been using Mint 12 since the RC came out, and I am far more happy with the Cinnamon, the Mate, and, yes (with extensions), theGnome 3...

1 day ago by Frederick Wrigley via Facebook on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
bdantas

Excellent article. One small correction, though--although a fresh installation of Linux Mint 12 will, indeed, provide the user with a version of...

1 day ago by bdantas on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

1 day ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

1 day ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Moley

For Gnome 2 die-hards, it is possible to add icons to the bottom panel (or top top panel, if you prefer) which provide the exact Gnome 2...

2 days ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint