Microsoft Virtual Server R2 ships with Linux support

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

NEWS

Microsoft Virtual Server Release 2 has begun shipping to manufacturers and is due for general release in the first week of December with a new pricing model and a number of new features, most notably formal support for Linux.

Virtual Server R2 manages multiple virtual machines on a single physical computer running Windows Server.

"Technically, Linux already worked on Virtual Server, but with R2 we have formalised support, and we will continue to support Linux in the future," said Bob Muglia, who recently took over as senior vice-president of Microsoft's server and tools division.

"One thing that customers are using Virtual Sever for is to consolidate their heterogeneous environments, so this makes a lot of sense," Muglia told ZDNet UK following his keynote at Microsoft's IT Forum in Barcelona on Tuesday.

Asked whether this signalled a growing acceptance within Microsoft of the heterogeneous nature of its larger customers, Muglia said: "Any enterprise customer has a ton of heterogeneous environments, and we have always accepted that. We're just giving them what they want."

Other new features in Virtual Server 2003 include the failover of virtual operating system session from one host to another in case of hardware failure.

There is also support for clustering virtual machines on a single host, and also on different hosts over iSCSI, and the ability to run natively within 64-bit Windows. The previous version only ran on 32-bit Windows versions.

But for many, the most exciting development in virtualisation is the idea of the hypervisor, which runs at a level below any operating system, meaning that there is no need for a host operating system. This ability for software to run at a 'deeper' level than the OS is enabled at the processor level by Intel's Virtualisation Technology and Pacifica from AMD, both of which are due to feature in chips shipping next year. Gartner analyst Brian Gammage believes that, in the hardware layer at least, support for hypervisors will be mainstream by the end of the 2007.

"By end of next year, companies will find it hard to buy a PC without virtualisation support in hardware," said Gammage, speaking to ZDNet UK recently. "By the end of 2007 it will be near-impossible. That is what I call mainstream."

But hypervisor technology remains one of the features that was dropped from Microsoft's immediate operating system plans in the rush to ship Vista and Longhorn server, a gap which Gammage believes will open a window of opportunity for competitors.

Microsoft has previously said that a hypervisor for Longhorn server is planned for the second half of 2007, which means it will not be in the first release. Muglia said the desktop hypervisor is further away.

"The desktop version requires increased capabilities," Muglia said. "We need to virtualise video and similar technologies which are not necessary in the server version — the desktop hypervisor will require everything that is in the server version, and then some."

While Microsoft works on that, the likes of VMWare and the Cambridge-based open source project Xen are attempting to establish a foothold. But Muglia remains bullish. "Xen is relatively immature. We do see a lot of customers choosing VMWare, but I don't see us getting far behind."

During his keynote, Muglia demonstrated Virtual Server R2 migrating a workload from one node to another. "That is failover, and that is shipping today," he stressed,

Microsoft is also talking to hardware vendors about the possibility of delivering "virtual appliances" — virtual machines with a stripped-down operating system that do a single, very specific job. "In Longhorn we are 'componentising' the operating system, so the base is a much smaller subset that just contains the features you need, such as file sharing, DHCP and so on." Muglia said the base component will have everything necessary to run the management partition.

Virtual Server 2005 R2 Standard Edition will cost $99 (£57) with support for up to four physical processors, or $199 for the enterprise edition which support as many processors as the host operating system can handle.

Talkback

meaning essentially that Microsoft just said that yes, GNU/Linux could be run on virtual systems. Oh my, grand new news! People just needed that acknowledgement!

via Facebook 17 November, 2005 14:50
Reply

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

Freebies202

Duplicate comments are not made intentionally. Its very good to know that now you are keeping check on this problem because sometimes a commenter...

27 minutes ago by Freebies202 on Microsoft fixes blog comments, speeds up blogs with open source
kevinmchapman

"the very significant number of users" and "many (most) of us" - you have no evidence for these statements. It is a fact that most users are saying...

8 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Marg Menzies Harrison

Another grammar faux pas is the improper use of "you". When sitting down down in a restaurant, for example, I get cringe when the waitress...

10 hours ago by Marg Menzies Harrison via Facebook on 10 flagrant grammar mistakes that make you look stupid
zdnetukuser

And NOW, folks, for Canonical's next trick... Kubuntu is late. Here's a pencil. Draw your own conclusions. cf.:...

11 hours ago by zdnetukuser on Linux Minterface
Moley

@kevinmchapman. The discussion here reflects the very significant number of users who really do like the traditional menu system and who wish to...

12 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

Er, no... It is an efficient means of finding the application/file/setting you need in one place. The icons are a simply a fallback for when you...

14 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

Isn't the provision of a text based search an admission by the developers that the mass of icons approach does not work? I don't need to use a...

15 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

"Unity and GNOME 3 both abandon the old text-based cascading menus in favour of a graphical icon-driven system." Point truly missed. Both use a...

16 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

whs001 - Thank you, I'm glad you liked the article. I absolutely agree with you on your first point. I should perhaps have made it clearer that...

16 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Dennis Nilsson

If we allow corporate interest to dictate the way our government circumvents due process against foreign entities then we should accept the same...

17 hours ago by Dennis Nilsson via Facebook on ACTA stumbles in Germany
GHar123

I totally dislike pirating of works, I fear that artists will be deterred from creating works if they think that they are going to get ripped off....

19 hours ago by GHar123 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
JCB33

How dare film makers, artists or anybody that invests in creativity stop us pirating their works for free. I want to be able to walk into my local...

1 day ago by JCB33 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
Moley

@GrueMaster. I prefer horses for courses rather than one size fits all. I, and I suspect most other computer users, do not really wish to have...

1 day ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
greycynic

The product that scares me every time I have to use it is the Office 2007 version of Excel. The first bug that I found was applying the median...

1 day ago by greycynic on Ten flawed products that derail productivity
GrueMaster

Nice review and very informative. One thing I'd like to add (in reply to whs001's 1st question), the main reason to have the same interface from...

1 day ago by GrueMaster on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Frederick Wrigley

I'be been using Mint 12 since the RC came out, and I am far more happy with the Cinnamon, the Mate, and, yes (with extensions), theGnome 3...

1 day ago by Frederick Wrigley via Facebook on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
bdantas

Excellent article. One small correction, though--although a fresh installation of Linux Mint 12 will, indeed, provide the user with a version of...

1 day ago by bdantas on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

1 day ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

1 day ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Moley

For Gnome 2 die-hards, it is possible to add icons to the bottom panel (or top top panel, if you prefer) which provide the exact Gnome 2...

1 day ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint