Microsoft intends to submit file formats for its new Office 12
applications to the European standards body ECMA International. The company hopes this will allay concern about its level of control over document formats.The company, which dominates the market for desktop productivity software, plans to provide the technical specifications of Office 12 file formats to ECMA early next month. The technical committee is also being sponsored by Intel, Apple, NextPage and some European customers, including BP and the British Library.
The creation of a fully documented standard submission derived from the formats, called Microsoft Office Open XML, is likely to take about a year, Microsoft executives said. Once Microsoft Office Open XML is recognised as an ECMA standard, the group of companies then intends to pursue standardisation at ISO, the International Organisation for Standardisation, which is particularly influential among government customers.
"Moving to standard as an open standard will place a level of trust on the technology that will give people the confidence to get behind it," said Alan Yates, general manager of Microsoft's information worker strategy. "We look forward to the day when people look at this as a milestone, as the beginning of the end for closed documents."
ECMA is a Geneva-based standards organisation which issues standards and recommendations. Microsoft has submitted other software to ECMA for standardisation, including programming languages ECMAScript and C#.
As part of its standardisation effort, Microsoft will change the licence in order to remove "virtually all the barriers" for developers working with the file formats.
Microsoft has already made the specifications for the XML document formats in Office 2003 available on a royalty-free basis. Office 12, which is expected to be completed by the end of 2006, will save documents by default in the Open XML format.
Many customers, notably government agencies with long-term record archiving needs, have pressured Microsoft to make its document formats available on favourable terms. With access to these technical specifications, customers are assured that documents can be read by many different products, according to Microsoft.
The British Library on Monday lauded Microsoft's move.
"It's an important step forward for digital preservation and will help us fulfil the British Library's core responsibility of making our digital collections accessible for generations to come," Adam Farquhar, head of e-architecture at the British Library, said in a statement.
Duelling office format standards
Despite Microsoft's
active embrace of XML-based file formats and work with government
customers, the commonwealth of Massachusetts — in a high-profile and
contested case — decided to adopt an XML-based format called
OpenDocument. The decision was driven in large part because
OpenDocument is developed by a multiparty standards organisation,
rather than a single company, according to state officials.
Some of Microsoft's foes have rallied behind OpenDocument, including IBM, Sun, Novell, Adobe and Google. Microsoft plans to accommodate OpenDocument formats in Office 12 through third-party products rather than native file format support.
Microsoft's Yates said that OpenDocument and Microsoft's Open XML formats both address productivity applications but have some differences. He said his company's formats are designed to be thoroughly compatible with all existing Office formats and to integrate XML-formatted data from other applications.
Redmonk analyst Stephen O'Grady said, based on Microsoft's previous ECMA standardisation efforts, it's not clear that Microsoft will relinquish control of the Office formats to other companies.
He noted that Microsoft submitted its C# and Common Language Runtime software to ECMA, and both are used by the open source project Mono. But Mono "is eyed warily by Microsoft", he said.
"It's interesting that Microsoft would feel compelled to make this move but at the end of the day, it's still a format controlled by a single commercial entity," O'Grady said.
Talkback
"Virtually all the barriers"
Microsoft's business strategies are better than it's software, as everyone knows, even if not particular ethical or edifying. We have seen Microsoft come from behind so many times to dominate and there can be no doubt that this is another such move.
It is quite correct that we should be suspicious and turn over every stone to see what's under it.
However, Microsoft has achieved a position of dominance which is almost unchallengeable, regardless of all the rumbles. Most people consider, impotently, that this is extremely unacceptable, even dangerous.
A point of interest is that there is almost no equivalent in any other industry for the sustained attack on competitors that is practiced by Microsoft, rather than healthy competition on the merit of it's products, whereby choice is both being stifled and denied.
Another fear is the concentration of power in a single, and potentially unaccountable, private organisation whose tentacles will reach into every aspect of our lives, in particular not only policing all our activities, but also dictating the policies which should flow from elected governments and judicial systems.
I fear that the boat has already sailed.
As always, I am reminded of the driven Jonas Cord in the Harold Robins' novel 'The Carpet Baggers'. However, he did see the light and change his ways at the end of the novel when he realised he had no friends left.
Microsoft did not have to alienate us all, that has been their choice which, ultimately, demonstrates their low (sorry, I can't find the right word) opinion of us, their customers.
Microsoft open document is a format standard
controlled by a single commercial entity. 24hrs
Is Microsoft doome?
Early next month, there is goimg to be a tidal wave, the Editor from Redmond is going to
submit his format Microsoft office open XML
This means that any company who wants
to use the standard will have to reformat
his pages in the computer which a double-click can do. But Linux which we have heard
alot noeadays will be obliged to de velop unless it is already done its format.
Further to the good summary by John (first poster) I can only add that it is depressing how many times everyone falls (and continues ot fall) for this 'thimble and pea' trick that MS manage to use with greta success.
We have seen the subjugation of standards by MS over and over again. Sometimes (as in Sendmail) it doesn't work, but in most areas, their success in hoodwinking otherwise sensible and knowledgable people is simply breathtaking. The incredible part is how predictable their strategems are: you just have to know they will do it over and again, always with selective arguments, good PR etc etc.
Never underestimate the weight of money in our world.
according to Wikipedia :
Netscape submitted JavaScript specification to Ecma International for standardization; the work on the specification, ECMA-262, began in November 1996.
So the statment in the article
Microsoft has submitted other software to ECMA for standardisation, including programming languages ECMAScript
appears to be incorrect - Microsoft worked with and likely submitted their JScript extensions to the standrd.